Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rebonatti, Melina Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP], Volf, Marcelo Raphael, Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir, Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325
Resumo: Soybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority.
id UNSP_5f3c4dfeec3eb5264f83735656a7580b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246325
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soilsDegraded pastureGrain productionSoil conservationSoil fertility recoverySoybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Department of Agronomy São Paulo Western University, Raposo Tavares HWY, Km 572, São PauloDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University, São PauloDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University, São PauloSão Paulo Western UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Rebonatti, Melina DanielCordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP]Volf, Marcelo RaphaelGomes da Silva, Paulo ClaudeirTiritan, Carlos Sérgio2023-07-29T12:37:55Z2023-07-29T12:37:55Z2023-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143.1161-0301http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24632510.1016/j.eja.2022.1266852-s2.0-85142155826Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal of Agronomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:37:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246325Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:02:09.740602Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
title Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
spellingShingle Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
Rebonatti, Melina Daniel
Degraded pasture
Grain production
Soil conservation
Soil fertility recovery
title_short Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
title_full Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
title_fullStr Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
title_full_unstemmed Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
title_sort Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
author Rebonatti, Melina Daniel
author_facet Rebonatti, Melina Daniel
Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP]
Volf, Marcelo Raphael
Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir
Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP]
Volf, Marcelo Raphael
Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir
Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv São Paulo Western University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rebonatti, Melina Daniel
Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP]
Volf, Marcelo Raphael
Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir
Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Degraded pasture
Grain production
Soil conservation
Soil fertility recovery
topic Degraded pasture
Grain production
Soil conservation
Soil fertility recovery
description Soybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-29T12:37:55Z
2023-07-29T12:37:55Z
2023-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143.
1161-0301
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325
10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685
2-s2.0-85142155826
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325
identifier_str_mv European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143.
1161-0301
10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685
2-s2.0-85142155826
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv European Journal of Agronomy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128234681794560