Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325 |
Resumo: | Soybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority. |
id |
UNSP_5f3c4dfeec3eb5264f83735656a7580b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246325 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soilsDegraded pastureGrain productionSoil conservationSoil fertility recoverySoybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Department of Agronomy São Paulo Western University, Raposo Tavares HWY, Km 572, São PauloDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University, São PauloDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences São Paulo State University, São PauloSão Paulo Western UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Rebonatti, Melina DanielCordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP]Volf, Marcelo RaphaelGomes da Silva, Paulo ClaudeirTiritan, Carlos Sérgio2023-07-29T12:37:55Z2023-07-29T12:37:55Z2023-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143.1161-0301http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24632510.1016/j.eja.2022.1266852-s2.0-85142155826Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEuropean Journal of Agronomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:37:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246325Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:02:09.740602Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
title |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
spellingShingle |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils Rebonatti, Melina Daniel Degraded pasture Grain production Soil conservation Soil fertility recovery |
title_short |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
title_full |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
title_fullStr |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
title_sort |
Effects of silage crops between crop seasons on soybean grain yield and soil fertility in tropical sandy soils |
author |
Rebonatti, Melina Daniel |
author_facet |
Rebonatti, Melina Daniel Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP] Volf, Marcelo Raphael Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP] Volf, Marcelo Raphael Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
São Paulo Western University Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rebonatti, Melina Daniel Cordeiro, Carlos Felipe dos Santos [UNESP] Volf, Marcelo Raphael Gomes da Silva, Paulo Claudeir Tiritan, Carlos Sérgio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Degraded pasture Grain production Soil conservation Soil fertility recovery |
topic |
Degraded pasture Grain production Soil conservation Soil fertility recovery |
description |
Soybean production in sandy soils under the recovery process presents risks that can be mitigated by growing crops between crop seasons, focused on silage production, which can assist in environmental improvement, accelerating soil recovery, in addition to improvement in soybean grain yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate soybean grain yield, silage yield and soil fertility in an area converted from degraded pasture to soybean production. The study was conducted a sandy soil, in Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2018. The treatments consisted of six silage crops (maize, sorghum, sunflower, palisade grass, millet, and pigeon pea) and a control with fallow (March-July) between soybean crop seasons (October-March). The mean soybean grain yield in the soybean-millet system (4400 kg ha−1) was, on average, 42% higher than that in the soybean-fallow (3100 Mg ha−1). The mean soybean grain yield (three crop seasons) in the systems with maize, sorghum, and sunflower was similar to that in the soybean-fallow system. The mean palisade grass silage yield was higher in two of the three crop seasons (16.8 Mg ha−1); maize also presented a good performance in the second crop seasons (10200 kg ha−1). The higher palisade grass silage production resulted in higher mean (three crop seasons) extraction of macronutrients (136, 129, 65, 54, 13.2 9.6 kg ha−1, for K, N, Ca, Mg, P, and S, respectively). The growth of millet and palisade grass crops between soybean crop seasons improved the soil fertility, but the effect of millet was faster (first harvest). The main soil fertility attributes affected were: phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, and base saturation. The best crop option to be grown between soybean crop seasons are millet and palisade grass for silage when focused on improvements in soil fertility and grain yield of the following soybean crop, and the choice between these two species depends on the farmer's priority. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-29T12:37:55Z 2023-07-29T12:37:55Z 2023-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685 European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143. 1161-0301 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685 2-s2.0-85142155826 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246325 |
identifier_str_mv |
European Journal of Agronomy, v. 143. 1161-0301 10.1016/j.eja.2022.126685 2-s2.0-85142155826 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal of Agronomy |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128234681794560 |