Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Andrighetto,Cristiana, Mateus,Gustavo Pavan, Lupatini,Gelci Carlos, Daldon,Murilo Scalet, Lima,Larissa Pereira de, Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da, Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802
Resumo: ABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.
id SBZ-1_67876490e8e61beccba41f50301c2df3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982022000100802
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systemsanimal welfaresilvopastoral systemthermal comfortABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.51 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.37496/rbz5120210047info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Juliana Mara de FreitasAndrighetto,CristianaMateus,Gustavo PavanLupatini,Gelci CarlosDaldon,Murilo ScaletLima,Larissa Pereira deLuz,Patrícia Aparecida daBello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silvaeng2022-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982022000100802Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2022-03-09T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
spellingShingle Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas
animal welfare
silvopastoral system
thermal comfort
title_short Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_full Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_fullStr Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_full_unstemmed Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_sort Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
author Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas
author_facet Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas
Andrighetto,Cristiana
Mateus,Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini,Gelci Carlos
Daldon,Murilo Scalet
Lima,Larissa Pereira de
Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da
Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva
author_role author
author2 Andrighetto,Cristiana
Mateus,Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini,Gelci Carlos
Daldon,Murilo Scalet
Lima,Larissa Pereira de
Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da
Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas
Andrighetto,Cristiana
Mateus,Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini,Gelci Carlos
Daldon,Murilo Scalet
Lima,Larissa Pereira de
Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da
Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv animal welfare
silvopastoral system
thermal comfort
topic animal welfare
silvopastoral system
thermal comfort
description ABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.37496/rbz5120210047
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.51 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318154390700032