Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process. |
id |
SBZ-1_67876490e8e61beccba41f50301c2df3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-35982022000100802 |
network_acronym_str |
SBZ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systemsanimal welfaresilvopastoral systemthermal comfortABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.51 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.37496/rbz5120210047info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Juliana Mara de FreitasAndrighetto,CristianaMateus,Gustavo PavanLupatini,Gelci CarlosDaldon,Murilo ScaletLima,Larissa Pereira deLuz,Patrícia Aparecida daBello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silvaeng2022-03-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982022000100802Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2022-03-09T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
title |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
spellingShingle |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas animal welfare silvopastoral system thermal comfort |
title_short |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
title_full |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
title_fullStr |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
title_sort |
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems |
author |
Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas |
author_facet |
Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas Andrighetto,Cristiana Mateus,Gustavo Pavan Lupatini,Gelci Carlos Daldon,Murilo Scalet Lima,Larissa Pereira de Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Andrighetto,Cristiana Mateus,Gustavo Pavan Lupatini,Gelci Carlos Daldon,Murilo Scalet Lima,Larissa Pereira de Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Juliana Mara de Freitas Andrighetto,Cristiana Mateus,Gustavo Pavan Lupatini,Gelci Carlos Daldon,Murilo Scalet Lima,Larissa Pereira de Luz,Patrícia Aparecida da Bello,Hornblenda Joaquina Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
animal welfare silvopastoral system thermal comfort |
topic |
animal welfare silvopastoral system thermal comfort |
description |
ABSTRACT The present study aimed to assess the productive performance, ingestive behavior, and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments—conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus, integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L), and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)—, in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM), chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass, average daily gain (ADG), stocking rate (SR), weight gain per area (WGA), behavior, microclimatic variables, and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L, with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature, temperature-humidity index, black globe-humidity index, and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing, resting, rumination, and other activities in the shade. In the summer, heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion, the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA, despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore, ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort, and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982022000100802 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.37496/rbz5120210047 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.51 2022 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) instacron:SBZ |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
instacron_str |
SBZ |
institution |
SBZ |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750318154390700032 |