Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Andrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP], Mateus, Gustavo Pavan, Lupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP], Daldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP], de Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP], da Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP], Bello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234294
Resumo: The present study aimed to assess the productive performance,ingestive behavior,and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments–conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus,integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L),and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)–,in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM),chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass,average daily gain (ADG),stocking rate (SR),weight gain per area (WGA),behavior,microclimatic variables,and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L,with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature,temperature-humidity index,black globe-humidity index,and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing,resting,rumination,and other activities in the shade. In the summer,heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion,the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA,despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore,ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort,and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.
id UNSP_8697506fd34caa5e63270fdc056b49b3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234294
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systemsAnimal welfareSilvopastoral systemThermal comfortThe present study aimed to assess the productive performance,ingestive behavior,and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments–conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus,integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L),and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)–,in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM),chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass,average daily gain (ADG),stocking rate (SR),weight gain per area (WGA),behavior,microclimatic variables,and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L,with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature,temperature-humidity index,black globe-humidity index,and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing,resting,rumination,and other activities in the shade. In the summer,heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion,the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA,despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore,ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort,and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, SPAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, SPCAPES: 2017/05944-8,2019/20039-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegóciosde Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]Andrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP]Mateus, Gustavo PavanLupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP]Daldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP]de Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]da Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP]Bello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]2022-05-01T15:46:15Z2022-05-01T15:46:15Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.1806-92901516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23429410.37496/rbz51202100472-s2.0-85126715262Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira de Zootecniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-07T13:48:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234294Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:21:46.756532Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
spellingShingle Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
de Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
Animal welfare
Silvopastoral system
Thermal comfort
title_short Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_full Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_fullStr Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_full_unstemmed Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
title_sort Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems
author de Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
author_facet de Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
Andrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP]
Mateus, Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP]
Daldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP]
de Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]
da Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP]
Bello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Andrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP]
Mateus, Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP]
Daldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP]
de Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]
da Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP]
Bello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
Andrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP]
Mateus, Gustavo Pavan
Lupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP]
Daldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP]
de Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]
da Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP]
Bello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal welfare
Silvopastoral system
Thermal comfort
topic Animal welfare
Silvopastoral system
Thermal comfort
description The present study aimed to assess the productive performance,ingestive behavior,and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments–conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus,integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L),and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)–,in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM),chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass,average daily gain (ADG),stocking rate (SR),weight gain per area (WGA),behavior,microclimatic variables,and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L,with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature,temperature-humidity index,black globe-humidity index,and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing,resting,rumination,and other activities in the shade. In the summer,heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion,the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA,despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore,ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort,and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T15:46:15Z
2022-05-01T15:46:15Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.
1806-9290
1516-3598
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234294
10.37496/rbz5120210047
2-s2.0-85126715262
url http://dx.doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234294
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.
1806-9290
1516-3598
10.37496/rbz5120210047
2-s2.0-85126715262
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129510311198720