Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rossi,Mariana Fonseca
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Martinele,Isabel, D'Agosto,Marta
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013001100010
Resumo: The objective of this study was to assess whether the straining of rumen content samples influences the estimation of protozoal density. Ninety rumen samples were obtained from 30 cattle (three samples per animal). The samples were subjected to one of three treatments at the moment of collection: 1) fixation informalin without straining(control treatment), 2) straining before fixation informalin, or 3)straining after fixation informalin.To test the hypothesis of the variation in the protozoa composition in the samples, multivariate analyses with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were carried out. The diversity and density of rumen protozoa were negatively affected by straining before fixation.In the pre-filtered sample, the number of ciliates from the genus Entodinium was reduced, and no individuals from the Diploplastron, Elytroplastron and Eudiplodinium genera were detected; these effects were not observed in the other two treatments. Straining after fixation did not interfere with the diversity of the ruminal community, but the abundance of protozoa was greater thanin the control treatment and significantly greater than in the samples filtered before fixation. These factors suggest that post-fixation straining is the recommended technique to analyze rumen protozoa.
id SBZ-1_cd760235324faee5bab23f2100982f0d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-35982013001100010
network_acronym_str SBZ-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixationCiliophoraEntodiniumruminal protozoaruminantThe objective of this study was to assess whether the straining of rumen content samples influences the estimation of protozoal density. Ninety rumen samples were obtained from 30 cattle (three samples per animal). The samples were subjected to one of three treatments at the moment of collection: 1) fixation informalin without straining(control treatment), 2) straining before fixation informalin, or 3)straining after fixation informalin.To test the hypothesis of the variation in the protozoa composition in the samples, multivariate analyses with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were carried out. The diversity and density of rumen protozoa were negatively affected by straining before fixation.In the pre-filtered sample, the number of ciliates from the genus Entodinium was reduced, and no individuals from the Diploplastron, Elytroplastron and Eudiplodinium genera were detected; these effects were not observed in the other two treatments. Straining after fixation did not interfere with the diversity of the ruminal community, but the abundance of protozoa was greater thanin the control treatment and significantly greater than in the samples filtered before fixation. These factors suggest that post-fixation straining is the recommended technique to analyze rumen protozoa.Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia2013-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013001100010Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.42 n.11 2013reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)instacron:SBZ10.1590/S1516-35982013001100010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossi,Mariana FonsecaMartinele,IsabelD'Agosto,Martaeng2013-10-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-35982013001100010Revistahttps://www.rbz.org.br/pt-br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br1806-92901516-3598opendoar:2013-10-31T00:00Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
title Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
spellingShingle Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
Rossi,Mariana Fonseca
Ciliophora
Entodinium
ruminal protozoa
ruminant
title_short Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
title_full Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
title_fullStr Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
title_sort Quantitative and differential analysis of ciliate protozoa in rumen content samples filtered before and after fixation
author Rossi,Mariana Fonseca
author_facet Rossi,Mariana Fonseca
Martinele,Isabel
D'Agosto,Marta
author_role author
author2 Martinele,Isabel
D'Agosto,Marta
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rossi,Mariana Fonseca
Martinele,Isabel
D'Agosto,Marta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ciliophora
Entodinium
ruminal protozoa
ruminant
topic Ciliophora
Entodinium
ruminal protozoa
ruminant
description The objective of this study was to assess whether the straining of rumen content samples influences the estimation of protozoal density. Ninety rumen samples were obtained from 30 cattle (three samples per animal). The samples were subjected to one of three treatments at the moment of collection: 1) fixation informalin without straining(control treatment), 2) straining before fixation informalin, or 3)straining after fixation informalin.To test the hypothesis of the variation in the protozoa composition in the samples, multivariate analyses with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) were carried out. The diversity and density of rumen protozoa were negatively affected by straining before fixation.In the pre-filtered sample, the number of ciliates from the genus Entodinium was reduced, and no individuals from the Diploplastron, Elytroplastron and Eudiplodinium genera were detected; these effects were not observed in the other two treatments. Straining after fixation did not interfere with the diversity of the ruminal community, but the abundance of protozoa was greater thanin the control treatment and significantly greater than in the samples filtered before fixation. These factors suggest that post-fixation straining is the recommended technique to analyze rumen protozoa.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013001100010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982013001100010
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-35982013001100010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia v.42 n.11 2013
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||bz@sbz.org.br|| secretariarbz@sbz.org.br
_version_ 1750318150929350656