Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida,Paulo J. A. L.
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Vieira,Marcus V., Kajin,Maja, Forero-Medina,German, Cerqueira,Rui
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-46702010000500002
Resumo: A fundamental step in the emerging Movement Theory is the description of movement paths, and the identification of its proximate and ultimate drivers. The most common characteristic used to describe and analyze movement paths is its tortuosity, and a variety of tortuosity indices have been proposed in different theoretical or empirical contexts. Here we review conceptual differences between five movement indices and their bias due to locations errors, sample sizes and scale-dependency: Intensity of Habitat use (IU), Fractal D, MSD (Mean Squared Distance), Straightness (ST), and Sinuosity (SI). Intensity of Habitat use and ST are straightforward to compute, but ST is actually an unbiased estimator of oriented search and ballistic movements. Fractal D is less straightforward to compute and represents an index of propensity to cover the plane, whereas IU is the only completely empirical of the three. These three indices could be used to identify different phases of path, and their path tortuosity is a dimensionless feature of the path, depending mostly on path shape, not on the unit of measurement. This concept of tortuosity differs from a concept implied in the sinuosity of BENHAMOU (2004), where a specific random walk movement model is assumed, and diffusion distance is a function of path length and turning angles, requiring their inclusion in a measure of sinuosity. MSD should be used as a diagnostic tool of random walk paths rather than an index of tortuosity. Bias due to location errors, sample size and scale, differs between the indices, as well as the concept of tortuosity implied. These differences must be considered when choosing the most appropriate index.
id SBZ-2_f13b9164103d868fc762f9281e05beca
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1984-46702010000500002
network_acronym_str SBZ-2
network_name_str Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errorsDiffusionfractal dimensionoriented searchrandom walksearch behaviourA fundamental step in the emerging Movement Theory is the description of movement paths, and the identification of its proximate and ultimate drivers. The most common characteristic used to describe and analyze movement paths is its tortuosity, and a variety of tortuosity indices have been proposed in different theoretical or empirical contexts. Here we review conceptual differences between five movement indices and their bias due to locations errors, sample sizes and scale-dependency: Intensity of Habitat use (IU), Fractal D, MSD (Mean Squared Distance), Straightness (ST), and Sinuosity (SI). Intensity of Habitat use and ST are straightforward to compute, but ST is actually an unbiased estimator of oriented search and ballistic movements. Fractal D is less straightforward to compute and represents an index of propensity to cover the plane, whereas IU is the only completely empirical of the three. These three indices could be used to identify different phases of path, and their path tortuosity is a dimensionless feature of the path, depending mostly on path shape, not on the unit of measurement. This concept of tortuosity differs from a concept implied in the sinuosity of BENHAMOU (2004), where a specific random walk movement model is assumed, and diffusion distance is a function of path length and turning angles, requiring their inclusion in a measure of sinuosity. MSD should be used as a diagnostic tool of random walk paths rather than an index of tortuosity. Bias due to location errors, sample size and scale, differs between the indices, as well as the concept of tortuosity implied. These differences must be considered when choosing the most appropriate index.Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia2010-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-46702010000500002Zoologia (Curitiba) v.27 n.5 2010reponame:Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologiainstacron:SBZ10.1590/S1984-46702010000500002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida,Paulo J. A. L.Vieira,Marcus V.Kajin,MajaForero-Medina,GermanCerqueira,Ruieng2010-11-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1984-46702010000500002Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/zoolONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbz@sbzoologia.org.br1984-46891984-4670opendoar:2010-11-23T00:00Zoologia (Curitiba. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
title Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
spellingShingle Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
Almeida,Paulo J. A. L.
Diffusion
fractal dimension
oriented search
random walk
search behaviour
title_short Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
title_full Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
title_fullStr Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
title_full_unstemmed Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
title_sort Indices of movement behaviour: conceptual background, effects of scale and location errors
author Almeida,Paulo J. A. L.
author_facet Almeida,Paulo J. A. L.
Vieira,Marcus V.
Kajin,Maja
Forero-Medina,German
Cerqueira,Rui
author_role author
author2 Vieira,Marcus V.
Kajin,Maja
Forero-Medina,German
Cerqueira,Rui
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida,Paulo J. A. L.
Vieira,Marcus V.
Kajin,Maja
Forero-Medina,German
Cerqueira,Rui
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Diffusion
fractal dimension
oriented search
random walk
search behaviour
topic Diffusion
fractal dimension
oriented search
random walk
search behaviour
description A fundamental step in the emerging Movement Theory is the description of movement paths, and the identification of its proximate and ultimate drivers. The most common characteristic used to describe and analyze movement paths is its tortuosity, and a variety of tortuosity indices have been proposed in different theoretical or empirical contexts. Here we review conceptual differences between five movement indices and their bias due to locations errors, sample sizes and scale-dependency: Intensity of Habitat use (IU), Fractal D, MSD (Mean Squared Distance), Straightness (ST), and Sinuosity (SI). Intensity of Habitat use and ST are straightforward to compute, but ST is actually an unbiased estimator of oriented search and ballistic movements. Fractal D is less straightforward to compute and represents an index of propensity to cover the plane, whereas IU is the only completely empirical of the three. These three indices could be used to identify different phases of path, and their path tortuosity is a dimensionless feature of the path, depending mostly on path shape, not on the unit of measurement. This concept of tortuosity differs from a concept implied in the sinuosity of BENHAMOU (2004), where a specific random walk movement model is assumed, and diffusion distance is a function of path length and turning angles, requiring their inclusion in a measure of sinuosity. MSD should be used as a diagnostic tool of random walk paths rather than an index of tortuosity. Bias due to location errors, sample size and scale, differs between the indices, as well as the concept of tortuosity implied. These differences must be considered when choosing the most appropriate index.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-46702010000500002
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-46702010000500002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1984-46702010000500002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Zoologia (Curitiba) v.27 n.5 2010
reponame:Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
instacron:SBZ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
instacron_str SBZ
institution SBZ
reponame_str Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)
collection Zoologia (Curitiba. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Zoologia (Curitiba. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbz@sbzoologia.org.br
_version_ 1750318090083631104