Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Wesley Luiz Fialho
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481
Resumo: Citriculture is one of the most important crops influencing the agricultural trade balance. It is estimated that half of the orange juice consumed in the world is produced in Brazilian orchards. In the last years the citriculture has been suffering from many risk factors, such as high incidence of pests and diseases. The introduction of Huanglongbing in Brazil raised the costs of spraying in the last years, besides leading to the eradication of several citrus trees. Thus, the replacement of these threes has made seedlings the main input in citriculture. In nursery seedlings, Phytophthora spp. Pathogens that causes citrus gummy are of great importance, but difficult to control because there are few effective active ingredients. The biological control has been showing good results in controlling these diseases using antagonistic bacteria, although stills incipient. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the two bacterial isolates Lactobacillus paracasei and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in inducing the production of phenolic compounds and activating defense enzymes of two citrus rootstocks Phytophthora nicotianae. Seeds of Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata, susceptible and resistant to P. nicotianae, respectively, were microbiolized with the bacteria in three assays. The substrate was inoculated with the phytopathogen at 75 days after sowing (assay 2), and the lap region was inoculated at 90 days after sowing (assay 3). The plant shoot was used to quantify the enzymes polyphenoxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and phenolic compounds. P. sunki plants non-inoculated with P. nicotianae (assay 1) showed higher levels of enzymatic activity of all enzymes, except POD, and plants inoculated with B. v amyloliquefaciens presented high activity of PAL and PPO. Plants inoculated with L. paracasei showed higher concentration of phenolic compounds. All C. sunki grown in substrate inoculated with P. nicotianae presented an increased in the enzymatic activity. PPO and PAL showed higher level of activity in the treatments with the bacteria, and there was accumulation of phenolic compounds. In P. trifoliata there was high activity of POD in plants treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. High activity if PAL was observed after inoculation by P. nicotianae in all treatments. C. sunki plants inoculated in lap region (assay 3) showed higher severity, and presented higher activity of POD and concentration of phenolic compounds when treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. amyloliquefaciens activated the defense system of citrus plants, however the enzymatic activity depends on the variety of the rootstock and if the plants were inoculated with the phytopathogen.
id SCAR_26f74681e11f7afa3345bcfb98c73182
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/9481
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Costa, Wesley Luiz FialhoKupper, Katia Cristinahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7900622063392740http://lattes.cnpq.br/8451987154093347119bf433-ec17-4d62-8306-60000f2ef1a52018-02-22T18:54:18Z2018-02-22T18:54:18Z2017-09-28COSTA, Wesley Luiz Fialho. Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros. 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481Citriculture is one of the most important crops influencing the agricultural trade balance. It is estimated that half of the orange juice consumed in the world is produced in Brazilian orchards. In the last years the citriculture has been suffering from many risk factors, such as high incidence of pests and diseases. The introduction of Huanglongbing in Brazil raised the costs of spraying in the last years, besides leading to the eradication of several citrus trees. Thus, the replacement of these threes has made seedlings the main input in citriculture. In nursery seedlings, Phytophthora spp. Pathogens that causes citrus gummy are of great importance, but difficult to control because there are few effective active ingredients. The biological control has been showing good results in controlling these diseases using antagonistic bacteria, although stills incipient. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the two bacterial isolates Lactobacillus paracasei and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in inducing the production of phenolic compounds and activating defense enzymes of two citrus rootstocks Phytophthora nicotianae. Seeds of Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata, susceptible and resistant to P. nicotianae, respectively, were microbiolized with the bacteria in three assays. The substrate was inoculated with the phytopathogen at 75 days after sowing (assay 2), and the lap region was inoculated at 90 days after sowing (assay 3). The plant shoot was used to quantify the enzymes polyphenoxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and phenolic compounds. P. sunki plants non-inoculated with P. nicotianae (assay 1) showed higher levels of enzymatic activity of all enzymes, except POD, and plants inoculated with B. v amyloliquefaciens presented high activity of PAL and PPO. Plants inoculated with L. paracasei showed higher concentration of phenolic compounds. All C. sunki grown in substrate inoculated with P. nicotianae presented an increased in the enzymatic activity. PPO and PAL showed higher level of activity in the treatments with the bacteria, and there was accumulation of phenolic compounds. In P. trifoliata there was high activity of POD in plants treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. High activity if PAL was observed after inoculation by P. nicotianae in all treatments. C. sunki plants inoculated in lap region (assay 3) showed higher severity, and presented higher activity of POD and concentration of phenolic compounds when treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. amyloliquefaciens activated the defense system of citrus plants, however the enzymatic activity depends on the variety of the rootstock and if the plants were inoculated with the phytopathogen.A citricultura se configura como uma das mais importantes culturas da balança agrícola brasileira. Estima-se que mais da metade do suco de laranja consumido no mundo origina-se dos pomares brasileiros. Nos últimos anos a citricultura vem sofrendo com diversos fatores de risco dentre esses, a alta incidência de pragas e de doenças. A introdução do “Huanglongbing” no Brasil fez o custo de pulverização aumentar exponencialmente nos últimos anos e, além disso, milhares de arvores cítricas foram erradicadas. Portanto, a reposição dessas plantas, tornou a muda o principal insumo da citricultura. Em viveiros de produção de mudas, patógenos do gênero Phytophthora causadores da “gomose dos citros” são de extrema importância. Tais patógenos são de difícil controle, principalmente, pelo fato de existirem poucos ingredientes ativos eficazes. O controle biológico, embora ainda incipiente, vem mostrando bons resultados para o controle dessas doenças através de bactérias antagonistas. Logo o objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a capacidade de dois isolados bacterianos, Lactobacillus paracasei e Bacillus amyloliquefaciens em induzir a produção de compostos fenólicos e, em ativar as enzimas de defesa, em dois porta-enxertos (PE) cítricos contra Phytophthora nicotianae. Sementes de Citrus sunki e Poncirus trifoliata suscetível e resistente, respectivamente, a P. nicotianae foram microbiolizadas com as bactérias, realizando ao todo três ensaios. A inoculação com o fitopatógeno ocorreu no substrato (75 dias após a semeadura) e na região do colo (aos 90 dias após a semeadura) nos ensaios 2 e 3, respectivamente. A iii parte aérea das plantas foi retirada para quantificação das enzimas polifenoloxidase (PPO), peroxidasse (POD), fenilalanina amônia-liase (PAL) e dos compostos fenólicos. Nas plantas não inoculadas com P. nicotianae (Ensaio 1), com exceção da POD, a maior atividade das enzimas foi em C. sunki e as plantas tratadas com B. amyloliquefaciens apresentaram alta atividade da PAL, PPO. As plantas submetidas ao tratamento com L. paracasei apresentaram maior concentração de compostos fenólicos. Após a inoculação com P. nicotianae no substrato em C. sunki houve aumento da atividade enzimática em todas as plantas. Nos tratamentos com as bactérias as maiores atividades foram da PPO, PAL e houve acúmulo de fenóis. Em P. trifoliata houve alta atividade da POD em plantas tratadas com B. amyloliquefaciens. Observou-se, alta atividade da PAL logo após inoculação de P. nicotianae em todos tratamentos. Quando as plantas foram inoculadas na região do colo (Ensaio 3), a severidade foi maior em C. sunki e, essas plantas, quando tratadas com B. amyloliquefaciens, apresentaram maior atividade da POD e maior concentração de compostos fenólicos. Conclui-se que, L. paracasei e B. amyloliquefaciens ativaram o sistema de defesa das plantas cítricas. Porém, a atividade enzimática dependeu da variedade do porta-enxerto e, se as plantas foram, ou não, inoculadas com o fitopatógeno.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus ArarasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural - PPGADR-ArUFSCarControle biológicoCitrusLactobacillus paracaseiBacillus amyloliquefaciensIndução de resistênciaBiological controlInduction of resistanceCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOSSANIDADEIndução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citrosInduction of resistance by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Lactobacillus paracasei to Phytophthora nicotianae in citrus rootstocksinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisOnline600600da535c7b-e2b0-4f10-8ed8-c9d26ea222f8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdfCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdfapplication/pdf1266218https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/7/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdfe0ee2d6f15481c3dd0da8d695c8be2a4MD57LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/6/license.txtae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD56TEXTCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.txtCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain107833https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/8/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.txt8bd10f3cc3d19124e648387bcf9edb1bMD58THUMBNAILCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.jpgCOSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7251https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/9/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.jpg94122d6cc0a7f7a5734165567dbb9fe6MD59ufscar/94812023-09-18 18:31:12.669oai:repositorio.ufscar.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:12Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Induction of resistance by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Lactobacillus paracasei to Phytophthora nicotianae in citrus rootstocks
title Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
spellingShingle Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
Costa, Wesley Luiz Fialho
Controle biológico
Citrus
Lactobacillus paracasei
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Indução de resistência
Biological control
Induction of resistance
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOSSANIDADE
title_short Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
title_full Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
title_fullStr Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
title_full_unstemmed Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
title_sort Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros
author Costa, Wesley Luiz Fialho
author_facet Costa, Wesley Luiz Fialho
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8451987154093347
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Wesley Luiz Fialho
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Kupper, Katia Cristina
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7900622063392740
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 119bf433-ec17-4d62-8306-60000f2ef1a5
contributor_str_mv Kupper, Katia Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Controle biológico
Citrus
Lactobacillus paracasei
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Indução de resistência
topic Controle biológico
Citrus
Lactobacillus paracasei
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Indução de resistência
Biological control
Induction of resistance
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOSSANIDADE
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Biological control
Induction of resistance
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOSSANIDADE
description Citriculture is one of the most important crops influencing the agricultural trade balance. It is estimated that half of the orange juice consumed in the world is produced in Brazilian orchards. In the last years the citriculture has been suffering from many risk factors, such as high incidence of pests and diseases. The introduction of Huanglongbing in Brazil raised the costs of spraying in the last years, besides leading to the eradication of several citrus trees. Thus, the replacement of these threes has made seedlings the main input in citriculture. In nursery seedlings, Phytophthora spp. Pathogens that causes citrus gummy are of great importance, but difficult to control because there are few effective active ingredients. The biological control has been showing good results in controlling these diseases using antagonistic bacteria, although stills incipient. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the two bacterial isolates Lactobacillus paracasei and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in inducing the production of phenolic compounds and activating defense enzymes of two citrus rootstocks Phytophthora nicotianae. Seeds of Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata, susceptible and resistant to P. nicotianae, respectively, were microbiolized with the bacteria in three assays. The substrate was inoculated with the phytopathogen at 75 days after sowing (assay 2), and the lap region was inoculated at 90 days after sowing (assay 3). The plant shoot was used to quantify the enzymes polyphenoxidase (PPO), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and phenolic compounds. P. sunki plants non-inoculated with P. nicotianae (assay 1) showed higher levels of enzymatic activity of all enzymes, except POD, and plants inoculated with B. v amyloliquefaciens presented high activity of PAL and PPO. Plants inoculated with L. paracasei showed higher concentration of phenolic compounds. All C. sunki grown in substrate inoculated with P. nicotianae presented an increased in the enzymatic activity. PPO and PAL showed higher level of activity in the treatments with the bacteria, and there was accumulation of phenolic compounds. In P. trifoliata there was high activity of POD in plants treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. High activity if PAL was observed after inoculation by P. nicotianae in all treatments. C. sunki plants inoculated in lap region (assay 3) showed higher severity, and presented higher activity of POD and concentration of phenolic compounds when treated with B. amyloliquefaciens. In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. amyloliquefaciens activated the defense system of citrus plants, however the enzymatic activity depends on the variety of the rootstock and if the plants were inoculated with the phytopathogen.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-09-28
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-02-22T18:54:18Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-02-22T18:54:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv COSTA, Wesley Luiz Fialho. Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros. 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481
identifier_str_mv COSTA, Wesley Luiz Fialho. Indução de resistência por Bacillus amyloliquefaciens e Lactobacillus paracasei à Phytophthora nicotianae em porta-enxertos de citros. 2017. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2017. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/9481
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv da535c7b-e2b0-4f10-8ed8-c9d26ea222f8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Araras
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural - PPGADR-Ar
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Araras
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/7/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/6/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/8/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/9481/9/COSTA_Wesley_2017.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e0ee2d6f15481c3dd0da8d695c8be2a4
ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d
8bd10f3cc3d19124e648387bcf9edb1b
94122d6cc0a7f7a5734165567dbb9fe6
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1813715583360827392