Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Luana Santos
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931
Resumo: The production of a quality seedling is essential to obtain positive results in field production and one of the factors that directly influences the formation of this seedling is the substrate chosen. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of five types of commercial substrates in the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings, from the Super-Seed® line, in order to identify which provides better development of the aerial and root parts of lettuce and concomitantly, select the most economically efficient for the production of seedlings. The substrates tested were: S1 = Golden Mix® coconut fiber, composed of mesocarp fibers from coconut shells and agricultural gypsum; S2 = substrate formed by the mixture of peat, expanded vermiculite, dolomitic limestone, agricultural gypsum and NPK fertilizer by Carolina Soil®; S3 = of the same composition as S2 but with a different index of water holding capacity, from Carolina Soil®; S4 = composed of sphagnum peat and limestone, from Carolina Soil®; S5 = Hortaliça BX substrate by Basaplant® made up of peat, limestone, vermiculite, charcoal, phosphate rock, pine bark and coconut fiber. The design used was randomized with 4 repetitions, where each repetition corresponds to a tray (200 cells). After 28 days of sowing, the following variables were analyzed: number of leaves (NF), aerial part length (CPA), root length (CR), aerial part fresh mass (MFPA), root fresh mass (MFR), dry mass Aerial (MSPA) and Root Dry Mass (MSR). The results were submitted to the 5% Tukey test. Substrate S3 (Carolina Soil® XVI) showed statistically superior results for the production of seedlings in all variables, standing out in CPA, MFPA and MSPA. S5 (Hortaliça BX) obtained statistically inferior results in the variables CPA, CR, MSPA and MFR, proving to be inefficient for the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings. The S1 (Golden Mix® Coconut Fiber) in addition to presenting efficient results in the NF, CR, MFPA and MFR items, proved to be the most economically viable with a cost of R$1.20/tray. Considering the economic viability together with the performance of the substrate, S1 is the recommended treatment to produce Deisy curly lettuce seedlings.
id SCAR_879a347bdc225bd602f7f2aed74c7f92
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17931
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Fernandes, Luana SantosRosa-Magri, Márcia Mariahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4166319985147604936c2453-63cd-44f7-9425-0dd1da53389a2023-05-03T18:51:48Z2023-05-03T18:51:48Z2023-04-06FERNANDES, Luana Santos. Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa. 2023. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agroecologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2023. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931The production of a quality seedling is essential to obtain positive results in field production and one of the factors that directly influences the formation of this seedling is the substrate chosen. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of five types of commercial substrates in the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings, from the Super-Seed® line, in order to identify which provides better development of the aerial and root parts of lettuce and concomitantly, select the most economically efficient for the production of seedlings. The substrates tested were: S1 = Golden Mix® coconut fiber, composed of mesocarp fibers from coconut shells and agricultural gypsum; S2 = substrate formed by the mixture of peat, expanded vermiculite, dolomitic limestone, agricultural gypsum and NPK fertilizer by Carolina Soil®; S3 = of the same composition as S2 but with a different index of water holding capacity, from Carolina Soil®; S4 = composed of sphagnum peat and limestone, from Carolina Soil®; S5 = Hortaliça BX substrate by Basaplant® made up of peat, limestone, vermiculite, charcoal, phosphate rock, pine bark and coconut fiber. The design used was randomized with 4 repetitions, where each repetition corresponds to a tray (200 cells). After 28 days of sowing, the following variables were analyzed: number of leaves (NF), aerial part length (CPA), root length (CR), aerial part fresh mass (MFPA), root fresh mass (MFR), dry mass Aerial (MSPA) and Root Dry Mass (MSR). The results were submitted to the 5% Tukey test. Substrate S3 (Carolina Soil® XVI) showed statistically superior results for the production of seedlings in all variables, standing out in CPA, MFPA and MSPA. S5 (Hortaliça BX) obtained statistically inferior results in the variables CPA, CR, MSPA and MFR, proving to be inefficient for the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings. The S1 (Golden Mix® Coconut Fiber) in addition to presenting efficient results in the NF, CR, MFPA and MFR items, proved to be the most economically viable with a cost of R$1.20/tray. Considering the economic viability together with the performance of the substrate, S1 is the recommended treatment to produce Deisy curly lettuce seedlings.A produção de mudas de qualidade é primordial para se obter resultados positivos na produção do campo e um dos fatores que influencia diretamente na formação desta muda, é o substrato escolhido. Objetivou-se com esse trabalho determinar o efeito de cinco tipos de substratos comerciais na produção de mudas de alface crespa Deisy, da linha Super-Seed®, a fim de identificar o qual proporciona melhor desenvolvimento da parte aérea e radicular de alface e concomitantemente, selecionar o mais eficiente economicamente para a produção das mudas. Os substratos testados foram: S1 = Fibra de coco Golden Mix®, composto por fibras do mesocarpo de cascas de coco e gesso agrícola; S2 = substrato formado pela mistura de turfa, vermiculita expandida, calcário dolomítico, gesso agrícola e fertilizante NPK da Carolina Soil®; S3 = de mesma composição que S2 mas com diferente índice de capacidade de retenção de água, da Carolina Soil®; S4 = composto por turfa de sphagnum e calcário, da marca Carolina Soil®; S5 = substrato Hortaliça BX da Basaplant® formado por turfa, rocha calcária, vermiculita, carvão vegetal, rocha fosfática, casca de pinus e fibra de coco. O delineamento utilizado foi casualizados com 4 repetições, onde cada repetição corresponde a uma bandeja (200 células). Após 28 dias do semeio, analisou-se as variáveis: Número de Folhas (NF), Comprimento Parte Aérea (CPA), Comprimento Raiz (CR), Massa Fresca Parte Aérea (MFPA), Massa Fresca Raiz (MFR), Massa Seca Parte Aérea (MSPA) e Massa Seca Raiz (MSR). Os resultados foram submetidos ao teste de Tukey a 5%. O substrato S3 (Carolina Soil® XVI) apresentou resultados estatisticamente superiores para a produção de mudas em todas as variáveis, destacando-se em CPA, MFPA e MSPA. O S5 (Hortaliça BX) obteve resultados estatisticamente inferiores nas variáveis CPA, CR, MSPA e MFR demonstrando ser ineficiente para produção de mudas de alface crespa Deisy. O S1 (Fibra de Coco Golden Mix®) além de apresentar resultados eficientes nos quesitos NF, CR, MFPA e MFR, demonstrou ser o mais viável economicamente com custo de R$1,20/bandeja. Considerando a viabilidade econômica em conjunto ao desempenho do substrato, S1 é o tratamento recomendado para a produção das mudas de alface crespa DeisyNão recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus ArarasAgroecologia - Ae-ArUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrescimento de plantasCusto de produçãoLactuca sativaPlant growthProduction costCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA::PRODUCAO DE MUDASEficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespaEfficiency and economic feasibility test of substrates for the production of lettuce seedlingsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis600600766f2e6a-d08e-4871-9a8c-4426d44dbf67reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALMonografia Luana.pdfMonografia Luana.pdfapplication/pdf670858https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/1/Monografia%20Luana.pdff71709c3ff9d6f2efa2b6a32dad0a1b2MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8810https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/2/license_rdff337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aecMD52TEXTMonografia Luana.pdf.txtMonografia Luana.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain54647https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/3/Monografia%20Luana.pdf.txtc7b7b3d898f9714724b8181ae29a1e98MD53THUMBNAILMonografia Luana.pdf.jpgMonografia Luana.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg5432https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/4/Monografia%20Luana.pdf.jpg6c2510d187000a8ab2fe9c28195a8026MD54ufscar/179312023-09-18 18:32:37.6oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/17931Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:32:37Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Efficiency and economic feasibility test of substrates for the production of lettuce seedlings
title Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
spellingShingle Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
Fernandes, Luana Santos
Crescimento de plantas
Custo de produção
Lactuca sativa
Plant growth
Production cost
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA::PRODUCAO DE MUDAS
title_short Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
title_full Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
title_fullStr Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
title_full_unstemmed Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
title_sort Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa
author Fernandes, Luana Santos
author_facet Fernandes, Luana Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Luana Santos
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rosa-Magri, Márcia Maria
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4166319985147604
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 936c2453-63cd-44f7-9425-0dd1da53389a
contributor_str_mv Rosa-Magri, Márcia Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Crescimento de plantas
Custo de produção
topic Crescimento de plantas
Custo de produção
Lactuca sativa
Plant growth
Production cost
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA::PRODUCAO DE MUDAS
dc.subject.lat.fl_str_mv Lactuca sativa
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Plant growth
Production cost
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA::FITOTECNIA::PRODUCAO DE MUDAS
description The production of a quality seedling is essential to obtain positive results in field production and one of the factors that directly influences the formation of this seedling is the substrate chosen. The objective of this work was to determine the effect of five types of commercial substrates in the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings, from the Super-Seed® line, in order to identify which provides better development of the aerial and root parts of lettuce and concomitantly, select the most economically efficient for the production of seedlings. The substrates tested were: S1 = Golden Mix® coconut fiber, composed of mesocarp fibers from coconut shells and agricultural gypsum; S2 = substrate formed by the mixture of peat, expanded vermiculite, dolomitic limestone, agricultural gypsum and NPK fertilizer by Carolina Soil®; S3 = of the same composition as S2 but with a different index of water holding capacity, from Carolina Soil®; S4 = composed of sphagnum peat and limestone, from Carolina Soil®; S5 = Hortaliça BX substrate by Basaplant® made up of peat, limestone, vermiculite, charcoal, phosphate rock, pine bark and coconut fiber. The design used was randomized with 4 repetitions, where each repetition corresponds to a tray (200 cells). After 28 days of sowing, the following variables were analyzed: number of leaves (NF), aerial part length (CPA), root length (CR), aerial part fresh mass (MFPA), root fresh mass (MFR), dry mass Aerial (MSPA) and Root Dry Mass (MSR). The results were submitted to the 5% Tukey test. Substrate S3 (Carolina Soil® XVI) showed statistically superior results for the production of seedlings in all variables, standing out in CPA, MFPA and MSPA. S5 (Hortaliça BX) obtained statistically inferior results in the variables CPA, CR, MSPA and MFR, proving to be inefficient for the production of Deisy crisp lettuce seedlings. The S1 (Golden Mix® Coconut Fiber) in addition to presenting efficient results in the NF, CR, MFPA and MFR items, proved to be the most economically viable with a cost of R$1.20/tray. Considering the economic viability together with the performance of the substrate, S1 is the recommended treatment to produce Deisy curly lettuce seedlings.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-05-03T18:51:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-05-03T18:51:48Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023-04-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FERNANDES, Luana Santos. Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa. 2023. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agroecologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2023. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931
identifier_str_mv FERNANDES, Luana Santos. Eficiência e viabilidade econômica de substratos para produção de mudas de alface crespa. 2023. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agroecologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Araras, 2023. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/17931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 766f2e6a-d08e-4871-9a8c-4426d44dbf67
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Araras
Agroecologia - Ae-Ar
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Araras
Agroecologia - Ae-Ar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/1/Monografia%20Luana.pdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/3/Monografia%20Luana.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/17931/4/Monografia%20Luana.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f71709c3ff9d6f2efa2b6a32dad0a1b2
f337d95da1fce0a22c77480e5e9a7aec
c7b7b3d898f9714724b8181ae29a1e98
6c2510d187000a8ab2fe9c28195a8026
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802136421495996416