O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5749 |
Resumo: | This study aims to analyze how the dialogical relationships and construction of meaning are built in current Catholic religious discourse, here represented by the encyclical letters of Pope Benedict XVI. I understand that even a discourse as established as the religious it is influenced by several others with which they share and to which they oppose ideas or use them to establish the meaning of the discourse. Thus, the dialogism and construction of meaning will be observed in the clash that occurs between the texts of the pope and the present discourses in society in different contexts, explicity and implicity referred to by the author, or even the discourses that are formed in different contexts in which these themes are inserted. So, the developed analysis will seek to understand, from the observation of dialogism in the documents in question, how to organize such discursive genre, and then establish, from the undeniable formation of extraverbal on the verbal, which is the relationship they have with these texts that circulate in society. I therefore consider that dialogical relations enable convergence or divergence, acceptance or refusal. In that way, one must do the question: what kind of opposing discourses should they keep deleted to preserve the hegemony of the official discourse? Which discourses are confronted with it? A discourse that intends to be dominant it tends to exclude others, not belonging to their universe that are not accepted or are discredited. The fundamental question of this analysis is therefore to understand the discourses of which we must defend and discourses to which we must resort to form the intended meaning in the encyclical letters in Authier Revuz (1990): that another one needs to defend, the other is needed to resort to be formed (p.31). Hence, this analysis seeks to verify how it happens, in the language, the confrontation of ideas which constitutes the discourse of this letter, analyzing how the voice of the Other is part of such discourse. The thought that will guide this research will be based on studies of the Russian philosopher Milkhail Bakhtin on Dialogism and Ideology. |
id |
SCAR_c791739c2d22f707a281d3d05cd764c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/5749 |
network_acronym_str |
SCAR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
repository_id_str |
4322 |
spelling |
Branco, Nanci MoreiraMiotello, Valdemirhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9131819326282708http://lattes.cnpq.br/8778865168706085ee51fb64-a5ae-4583-a51d-47c7b86d00562016-06-02T20:25:15Z2012-11-162016-06-02T20:25:15Z2012-03-27BRANCO, Nanci Moreira. O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI. 2012. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5749This study aims to analyze how the dialogical relationships and construction of meaning are built in current Catholic religious discourse, here represented by the encyclical letters of Pope Benedict XVI. I understand that even a discourse as established as the religious it is influenced by several others with which they share and to which they oppose ideas or use them to establish the meaning of the discourse. Thus, the dialogism and construction of meaning will be observed in the clash that occurs between the texts of the pope and the present discourses in society in different contexts, explicity and implicity referred to by the author, or even the discourses that are formed in different contexts in which these themes are inserted. So, the developed analysis will seek to understand, from the observation of dialogism in the documents in question, how to organize such discursive genre, and then establish, from the undeniable formation of extraverbal on the verbal, which is the relationship they have with these texts that circulate in society. I therefore consider that dialogical relations enable convergence or divergence, acceptance or refusal. In that way, one must do the question: what kind of opposing discourses should they keep deleted to preserve the hegemony of the official discourse? Which discourses are confronted with it? A discourse that intends to be dominant it tends to exclude others, not belonging to their universe that are not accepted or are discredited. The fundamental question of this analysis is therefore to understand the discourses of which we must defend and discourses to which we must resort to form the intended meaning in the encyclical letters in Authier Revuz (1990): that another one needs to defend, the other is needed to resort to be formed (p.31). Hence, this analysis seeks to verify how it happens, in the language, the confrontation of ideas which constitutes the discourse of this letter, analyzing how the voice of the Other is part of such discourse. The thought that will guide this research will be based on studies of the Russian philosopher Milkhail Bakhtin on Dialogism and Ideology.Este trabalho tem como objetivo analisar como se dão as relações dialógicas e a construção do sentido no discurso religioso católico atual, aqui representado pelas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI. Entendo que mesmo um discurso tão consolidado como o religioso sofre influências de vários outros com os quais partilha e aos quais contrapõe idéias ou delas faz uso para estabelecer o sentido do seu discurso. Dessa forma, o dialogismo e a construção de sentido serão observados no confronto que se dá entre os textos do papa e os discursos presentes na sociedade em diferentes contextos, referidos explícita e implicitamente pelo autor, ou, ainda, os discursos que se formam nos contextos diversos nos quais tais temas estão inseridos. Assim, a análise desenvolvida buscará compreender, a partir da observação da dialogia nos documentos em questão, como se organiza tal gênero discursivo, e depois estabelecer, a partir da constitutividade inegável do extraverbal sobre o verbal, qual a relação que tais textos têm com os que circulam na sociedade. Considero, para tanto, que as relações dialógicas podem ser de convergência ou divergência, de aceitação ou recusa. Assim, cabe questionar: que discursos opostos devem ser mantidos apagados para a preservação da hegemonia do discurso oficial? Que discursos o confrontam? Um discurso que se pretende dominante tende a excluir outros que não pertençam ao seu universo que não são aceitos ou são desprestigiados. A questão fundamental desta análise é, portanto, entender os discursos dos quais é preciso se defender e os discursos aos quais é preciso recorrer para constituir o sentido pretendido nas cartas encíclicas em Authier-Revuz (1990): de que outro é preciso se defender, a que outros é preciso recorrer para se constituir (p.31). Assim, esta análise busca verificar como se dá, na linguagem, o confronto de idéias que constitui o discurso desta carta, analisando como a voz do Outro entra em tal discurso. O pensamento que norteará esta pesquisa será os estudos do filósofo russo Mikhail Bakhtin sobre Dialogismo e Ideologia.Financiadora de Estudos e Projetosapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Linguística - PPGLUFSCarBRAnálise do discursoDiscurso religiosoBento XVI, Papa, 1927-DialogismoIdeologiaBakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovitch, 1895-1975Religious DiscourseBenedictDialogismIdeologyBakhtinLINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICAO dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVIinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1-1cb0ca99c-bdbb-48f1-a624-fba7a81eb5c1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINAL4677.pdfapplication/pdf2134266https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/1/4677.pdf6df397fd9e24c44b8f077e8e9b635325MD51TEXT4677.pdf.txt4677.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain0https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/2/4677.pdf.txtd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD52THUMBNAIL4677.pdf.jpg4677.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg10342https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/3/4677.pdf.jpg03c028a86cf4165a1f70c5bd04854b68MD53ufscar/57492023-09-18 18:31:36.581oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:ufscar/5749Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestopendoar:43222023-09-18T18:31:36Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
title |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
spellingShingle |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI Branco, Nanci Moreira Análise do discurso Discurso religioso Bento XVI, Papa, 1927- Dialogismo Ideologia Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovitch, 1895-1975 Religious Discourse Benedict Dialogism Ideology Bakhtin LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
title_short |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
title_full |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
title_fullStr |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
title_full_unstemmed |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
title_sort |
O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI |
author |
Branco, Nanci Moreira |
author_facet |
Branco, Nanci Moreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8778865168706085 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Branco, Nanci Moreira |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Miotello, Valdemir |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9131819326282708 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
ee51fb64-a5ae-4583-a51d-47c7b86d0056 |
contributor_str_mv |
Miotello, Valdemir |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Análise do discurso Discurso religioso Bento XVI, Papa, 1927- Dialogismo Ideologia Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovitch, 1895-1975 |
topic |
Análise do discurso Discurso religioso Bento XVI, Papa, 1927- Dialogismo Ideologia Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovitch, 1895-1975 Religious Discourse Benedict Dialogism Ideology Bakhtin LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Religious Discourse Benedict Dialogism Ideology Bakhtin |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
description |
This study aims to analyze how the dialogical relationships and construction of meaning are built in current Catholic religious discourse, here represented by the encyclical letters of Pope Benedict XVI. I understand that even a discourse as established as the religious it is influenced by several others with which they share and to which they oppose ideas or use them to establish the meaning of the discourse. Thus, the dialogism and construction of meaning will be observed in the clash that occurs between the texts of the pope and the present discourses in society in different contexts, explicity and implicity referred to by the author, or even the discourses that are formed in different contexts in which these themes are inserted. So, the developed analysis will seek to understand, from the observation of dialogism in the documents in question, how to organize such discursive genre, and then establish, from the undeniable formation of extraverbal on the verbal, which is the relationship they have with these texts that circulate in society. I therefore consider that dialogical relations enable convergence or divergence, acceptance or refusal. In that way, one must do the question: what kind of opposing discourses should they keep deleted to preserve the hegemony of the official discourse? Which discourses are confronted with it? A discourse that intends to be dominant it tends to exclude others, not belonging to their universe that are not accepted or are discredited. The fundamental question of this analysis is therefore to understand the discourses of which we must defend and discourses to which we must resort to form the intended meaning in the encyclical letters in Authier Revuz (1990): that another one needs to defend, the other is needed to resort to be formed (p.31). Hence, this analysis seeks to verify how it happens, in the language, the confrontation of ideas which constitutes the discourse of this letter, analyzing how the voice of the Other is part of such discourse. The thought that will guide this research will be based on studies of the Russian philosopher Milkhail Bakhtin on Dialogism and Ideology. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2012-11-16 2016-06-02T20:25:15Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-03-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-02T20:25:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
BRANCO, Nanci Moreira. O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI. 2012. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5749 |
identifier_str_mv |
BRANCO, Nanci Moreira. O dialogismo e a construção de sentido nas cartas encíclicas do papa Bento XVI. 2012. 173 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Humanas) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2012. |
url |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5749 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
-1 -1 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
cb0ca99c-bdbb-48f1-a624-fba7a81eb5c1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística - PPGL |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSCar |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:UFSCAR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
UFSCAR |
institution |
UFSCAR |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/1/4677.pdf https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/2/4677.pdf.txt https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstream/ufscar/5749/3/4677.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
6df397fd9e24c44b8f077e8e9b635325 d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 03c028a86cf4165a1f70c5bd04854b68 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1802136288452673536 |