INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buffon, Viviane Aline
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ribas, Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes, Isolan, Gustavo Rassier, Czeczko, Nicolau Gregori
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4257
Resumo: Background: Insula tumors are responsible for up to 25% of low-grade gliomas and 10% of high-grade gliomas. The insula has a complex anatomy, including an eloquent cortex and intimate contact with an arterial vascularization responsible supplying the motor and language systems. Using transsylvian and transcortical corridors for resect insular gliomas remains controversial, and the main concerns behind this are vascular injury during transsylvian dissection and functional impairment in transcortical access. Aim: Observe if there are differences in the extent of lesion resection, postoperative morbidity or survival between the two approaches. Method: 55 patients who underwent resection of insular gliomas by the senior author (GRI) were evaluated, and data related to sex, age at the time of surgical procedure, presence of refractory epilepsy, side of the lesion, pre- and postoperative tumor volumetry, Yasargil and Berger-Sanai classification, encasement of lenticulostriate arteries, neurological examination, and survival were collected. Results: Thirty-one patients (56.4%) underwent a transsylvian approach and 28 patients (43.6%) underwent a transcortical approach. The extent of resection (EOS)> 90% was 61.3% in the transsylvian group and 45.8% in the transcortical group (p = 0.385). The transsylvian approach was chosen for most of the Yasargil type 3 tumors. Late postoperative evaluations of the 2 groups were similar. Conclusions: The transsylvian and transcortical approaches do not present any significant difference in relation to the degree of resection (p = 0.385), survival (p = 0.204), or results in neurological deficits in the late postoperative period.
id SCI-1_07ece6f1d46020a29e23c043ad02ce18
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4257
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVALGLIOMAS DA ÍNSULA: CORRELAÇÃO ENTRE O TIPO DE ABORDAGEM (TRANSILVIANA X TRANSCORTICAL) COM EXTENSÃO DA RESSECÇÃO, MORBIDADE E SOBREVIDAGliomas da ínsulaMapeamento cerebralAcesso transsilvianoAcesso transcorticalExtensão de ressecçãoTécnica cirúrgicaInsula gliomasBrain mappingTranssylvianTranscorticalExtent of resectionSurgical techiqueBackground: Insula tumors are responsible for up to 25% of low-grade gliomas and 10% of high-grade gliomas. The insula has a complex anatomy, including an eloquent cortex and intimate contact with an arterial vascularization responsible supplying the motor and language systems. Using transsylvian and transcortical corridors for resect insular gliomas remains controversial, and the main concerns behind this are vascular injury during transsylvian dissection and functional impairment in transcortical access. Aim: Observe if there are differences in the extent of lesion resection, postoperative morbidity or survival between the two approaches. Method: 55 patients who underwent resection of insular gliomas by the senior author (GRI) were evaluated, and data related to sex, age at the time of surgical procedure, presence of refractory epilepsy, side of the lesion, pre- and postoperative tumor volumetry, Yasargil and Berger-Sanai classification, encasement of lenticulostriate arteries, neurological examination, and survival were collected. Results: Thirty-one patients (56.4%) underwent a transsylvian approach and 28 patients (43.6%) underwent a transcortical approach. The extent of resection (EOS)> 90% was 61.3% in the transsylvian group and 45.8% in the transcortical group (p = 0.385). The transsylvian approach was chosen for most of the Yasargil type 3 tumors. Late postoperative evaluations of the 2 groups were similar. Conclusions: The transsylvian and transcortical approaches do not present any significant difference in relation to the degree of resection (p = 0.385), survival (p = 0.204), or results in neurological deficits in the late postoperative period.Racional: Os tumores da ínsula são responsáveis por até 25% dos gliomas de baixo grau e 10% dos de alto grau. A ínsula apresenta uma anatomia complexa, incluindo um córtex eloquente e íntimo contato com uma vascularização responsável pelo suprimento arterial para o sistema motor e de linguagem. A escolha de corredores transsilviano ou transcortical para ressecção de gliomas insulares permanece controversa, e as principais preocupações são a lesão vascular durante a dissecção transilviana e o comprometimento funcional no acesso transcortical. Objetivo: Comparar se há diferença entre a extensão da ressecção da lesão, a morbidade pós operatória ou sobrevida entre as duas abordagens. Método: Foram avaliados 55 pacientes submetidos à ressecção de gliomas insulares e extraídos os dados referentes ao sexo, idade na data do procedimento cirúrgico, presença de 2 epilepsia refratária no pré-operatório, lado da lesão, o volume da lesão em cm3 , calculados a partir da RM encefálica pré-operatória, classificação dos tumores insulares, a técnica cirúrgica utilizada, monitorização intraoperatória, grau histológico obtido através do exame anatomopatológico, extensão da ressecção cirúrgica no pósoperatório, exame neurológico no pré-operatório, pós-operatório tardio, avaliado em 6 meses, além do seguimento evolutivo até dezembro de 2020. Resultados: Foram analisados dados de 55 pacientes com gliomas insulares de baixo ou alto grau. Trinta e um pacientes (56,4%) foram submetidos a abordagem transilviana, e 28 pacientes (43,6%) a abordagem transcortical. A extensão da ressecção (EOR) > 90% foi de 61,3% no grupo transsilviano e 45,8% no grupo transcortical (p = 0,385). A avaliação pós-operatória tardia para os 2 grupos foi semelhantes. No geral, 8 pacientes (25,8%) no grupo transsilviano e 5 pacientes (20,8%) no grupo transcortical apresentou déficit neurológico persistente no pós- operatório tardio. A sobrevida em 24 meses é de 81,3% no grupo transcortical e 92% no transcortical. Conclusões: A abordagem transilviana e transcortical não apresentam diferença significativa em relação ao grau de ressecção (p=0,385), na sobrevida (p=0,204) e na presença de déficit no pósoperatório tardio.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/425710.1590/SciELOPreprints.4257porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4257/8072Copyright (c) 2022 Viviane Aline Buffon, Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes Ribas, Gustavo Rassier Isolan, Nicolau Gregori Czeczkohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBuffon, Viviane AlineRibas, Carmen Austrália Paredes MarcondesIsolan, Gustavo RassierCzeczko, Nicolau Gregorireponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-06-13T19:00:14Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/4257Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-06-13T19:00:14SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
GLIOMAS DA ÍNSULA: CORRELAÇÃO ENTRE O TIPO DE ABORDAGEM (TRANSILVIANA X TRANSCORTICAL) COM EXTENSÃO DA RESSECÇÃO, MORBIDADE E SOBREVIDA
title INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
spellingShingle INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
Buffon, Viviane Aline
Gliomas da ínsula
Mapeamento cerebral
Acesso transsilviano
Acesso transcortical
Extensão de ressecção
Técnica cirúrgica
Insula gliomas
Brain mapping
Transsylvian
Transcortical
Extent of resection
Surgical techique
title_short INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
title_full INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
title_fullStr INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
title_full_unstemmed INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
title_sort INSULA GLIOMAS: CORRELATION BETWEEN THE TYPE OF APPROACH (TRANSYLVIAN X TRANSCORTICAL) WITH EXTENT OF RESECTION, MORBIDITY AND SURVIVAL
author Buffon, Viviane Aline
author_facet Buffon, Viviane Aline
Ribas, Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes
Isolan, Gustavo Rassier
Czeczko, Nicolau Gregori
author_role author
author2 Ribas, Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes
Isolan, Gustavo Rassier
Czeczko, Nicolau Gregori
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buffon, Viviane Aline
Ribas, Carmen Austrália Paredes Marcondes
Isolan, Gustavo Rassier
Czeczko, Nicolau Gregori
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gliomas da ínsula
Mapeamento cerebral
Acesso transsilviano
Acesso transcortical
Extensão de ressecção
Técnica cirúrgica
Insula gliomas
Brain mapping
Transsylvian
Transcortical
Extent of resection
Surgical techique
topic Gliomas da ínsula
Mapeamento cerebral
Acesso transsilviano
Acesso transcortical
Extensão de ressecção
Técnica cirúrgica
Insula gliomas
Brain mapping
Transsylvian
Transcortical
Extent of resection
Surgical techique
description Background: Insula tumors are responsible for up to 25% of low-grade gliomas and 10% of high-grade gliomas. The insula has a complex anatomy, including an eloquent cortex and intimate contact with an arterial vascularization responsible supplying the motor and language systems. Using transsylvian and transcortical corridors for resect insular gliomas remains controversial, and the main concerns behind this are vascular injury during transsylvian dissection and functional impairment in transcortical access. Aim: Observe if there are differences in the extent of lesion resection, postoperative morbidity or survival between the two approaches. Method: 55 patients who underwent resection of insular gliomas by the senior author (GRI) were evaluated, and data related to sex, age at the time of surgical procedure, presence of refractory epilepsy, side of the lesion, pre- and postoperative tumor volumetry, Yasargil and Berger-Sanai classification, encasement of lenticulostriate arteries, neurological examination, and survival were collected. Results: Thirty-one patients (56.4%) underwent a transsylvian approach and 28 patients (43.6%) underwent a transcortical approach. The extent of resection (EOS)> 90% was 61.3% in the transsylvian group and 45.8% in the transcortical group (p = 0.385). The transsylvian approach was chosen for most of the Yasargil type 3 tumors. Late postoperative evaluations of the 2 groups were similar. Conclusions: The transsylvian and transcortical approaches do not present any significant difference in relation to the degree of resection (p = 0.385), survival (p = 0.204), or results in neurological deficits in the late postoperative period.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4257
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4257
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/4257
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4257
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/4257/8072
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047828665597952