Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1208 |
Resumo: | Objective: This article proposes to create an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) and analyzes the protocol used by Santa Catarina. Method: The descriptive research was composed of three parts: 1) extraction of information regarding risk analysis and COVID-19 from WHO documents; 2) elaboration of an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the WHO guidelines; 3) application of the instrument to the protocol used in the state of Santa Catarina. Results: Five WHO documents were reviewed. The built instrument included five dimensions: risk assessment itself, exposure assessment, context assessment, risk characterization and reliability. Partial information regarding the risk assessment itself and reliability was found in the Santa Catarina government protocol. No information was found regarding the other dimensions. Discussion: The mismatch between the matrix used by the state of Santa Catarina and the WHO risk analysis guidelines is huge. Thus, without an adequate analysis of these factors, the entire strategy for implementing actions can be compromised, exposing the population of the state to risk. |
id |
SCI-1_10893d748f65e3eba5c441fbaa37b1b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1208 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrumentAdequação de protocolos de classificação de risco para COVID-19 às orientações da OMS: uma proposta de instrumentoInfecções por CoronavírusAnálise de RiscoOrganização Mundial de SaúdeGovernoCoronavirus InfectionsRisk AnalysisWorld Health OrganizationGovernmentObjective: This article proposes to create an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) and analyzes the protocol used by Santa Catarina. Method: The descriptive research was composed of three parts: 1) extraction of information regarding risk analysis and COVID-19 from WHO documents; 2) elaboration of an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the WHO guidelines; 3) application of the instrument to the protocol used in the state of Santa Catarina. Results: Five WHO documents were reviewed. The built instrument included five dimensions: risk assessment itself, exposure assessment, context assessment, risk characterization and reliability. Partial information regarding the risk assessment itself and reliability was found in the Santa Catarina government protocol. No information was found regarding the other dimensions. Discussion: The mismatch between the matrix used by the state of Santa Catarina and the WHO risk analysis guidelines is huge. Thus, without an adequate analysis of these factors, the entire strategy for implementing actions can be compromised, exposing the population of the state to risk.Objetivo: Este artigo propõe criar um instrumento para analisar a adequação de protocolos de classificação de risco para COVID-19 às orientações da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) e analisa o protocolo utilizado por Santa Catarina. Método: A pesquisa descritiva foi composta de três partes: 1) extração de informações concernentes à análise de risco e à COVID-19 dos documentos da OMS; 2) elaboração de instrumento para análise da adequação de protocolos de classificação de risco para COVID-19 às orientações da OMS; 3) aplicação do instrumento ao protocolo utilizado no estado de Santa Catarina. Resultados: Cinco documentos da OMS foram revistos. O instrumento construído contemplou cinco dimensões: avaliação do risco em si, avaliação da exposição, avaliação do contexto, caracterização do risco e confiabilidade. Informações parciais com relação à avaliação do risco em si e à confiabilidade foram encontradas no protocolo do governo catarinense. Não foram encontradas informações com relação às demais dimensões. Discussão: O desencontro entre a matriz utilizada pelo estado de Santa Catarina e as orientações para análise de risco da OMS são grandes. Assim, sem uma análise adequada desses fatores toda a estratégia de implementação de ações pode ser comprometida, expondo a população do estado a risco.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/120810.1590/SciELOPreprints.1208porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1208/1900Copyright (c) 2020 Leandro Pereira Garcia, Maria Cristina Antunes Willemann, Alexandra Crispim Boing, Fernanda Vargas Amaral, Ana Cristina Vidor, Patrícia Maria de Oliveira Machado, Natália Moreira, Tatiane Cristina Moraes de Sousa, Lorena Barberia, Jefferson Traebert, Josimari Telino de Lacerdahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia, Leandro PereiraWillemann, Maria Cristina AntunesBoing, Alexandra CrispimAmaral, Fernanda VargasVidor, Ana Cristina Machado, Patrícia Maria de Oliveira Moreira, Natália de Sousa, Tatiane Cristina Moraes Barberia, Lorena Traebert, Jefferson Lacerda, Josimari Telino dereponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-09-12T16:07:52Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1208Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-09-12T16:07:52SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument Adequação de protocolos de classificação de risco para COVID-19 às orientações da OMS: uma proposta de instrumento |
title |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
spellingShingle |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument Garcia, Leandro Pereira Infecções por Coronavírus Análise de Risco Organização Mundial de Saúde Governo Coronavirus Infections Risk Analysis World Health Organization Government |
title_short |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
title_full |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
title_fullStr |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
title_sort |
Adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to WHO guidelines: a proposed instrument |
author |
Garcia, Leandro Pereira |
author_facet |
Garcia, Leandro Pereira Willemann, Maria Cristina Antunes Boing, Alexandra Crispim Amaral, Fernanda Vargas Vidor, Ana Cristina Machado, Patrícia Maria de Oliveira Moreira, Natália de Sousa, Tatiane Cristina Moraes Barberia, Lorena Traebert, Jefferson Lacerda, Josimari Telino de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Willemann, Maria Cristina Antunes Boing, Alexandra Crispim Amaral, Fernanda Vargas Vidor, Ana Cristina Machado, Patrícia Maria de Oliveira Moreira, Natália de Sousa, Tatiane Cristina Moraes Barberia, Lorena Traebert, Jefferson Lacerda, Josimari Telino de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, Leandro Pereira Willemann, Maria Cristina Antunes Boing, Alexandra Crispim Amaral, Fernanda Vargas Vidor, Ana Cristina Machado, Patrícia Maria de Oliveira Moreira, Natália de Sousa, Tatiane Cristina Moraes Barberia, Lorena Traebert, Jefferson Lacerda, Josimari Telino de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Infecções por Coronavírus Análise de Risco Organização Mundial de Saúde Governo Coronavirus Infections Risk Analysis World Health Organization Government |
topic |
Infecções por Coronavírus Análise de Risco Organização Mundial de Saúde Governo Coronavirus Infections Risk Analysis World Health Organization Government |
description |
Objective: This article proposes to create an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) and analyzes the protocol used by Santa Catarina. Method: The descriptive research was composed of three parts: 1) extraction of information regarding risk analysis and COVID-19 from WHO documents; 2) elaboration of an instrument to analyze the adequacy of risk classification protocols for COVID-19 to the WHO guidelines; 3) application of the instrument to the protocol used in the state of Santa Catarina. Results: Five WHO documents were reviewed. The built instrument included five dimensions: risk assessment itself, exposure assessment, context assessment, risk characterization and reliability. Partial information regarding the risk assessment itself and reliability was found in the Santa Catarina government protocol. No information was found regarding the other dimensions. Discussion: The mismatch between the matrix used by the state of Santa Catarina and the WHO risk analysis guidelines is huge. Thus, without an adequate analysis of these factors, the entire strategy for implementing actions can be compromised, exposing the population of the state to risk. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1208 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1208 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1208 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1208/1900 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047820107120640 |