Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.
id USP-23_59f5c360dafe49b46ce03f37560691c2
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/169519
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinantsModelo de crença em saúde para determinantes de risco para contaminação por coronavírus: Coronavirus Infections, prevention & controlCoronavirus Infections, psychologyRisk Reduction BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controleInfecções por Coronavirus, psicologiaComportamento de Redução do RiscoConhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em SaúdeOBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.OBJETIVO: Neste estudo buscamos utilizar as vantagens de uma escala de razão por ancoragem verbal para medidas da percepção de risco de contágio pelo novo coronavírus, causador da covid-19, em um questionário baseado no modelo de crença em saúde, assim como avaliar sua validade e reprodutibilidade. MÉTODO: Utilizamos o modelo de crença em saúde, o qual explora quatro dimensões: percepção individual de susceptibilidade percebida (cinco questões), severidade percebida (cinco questões), benefícios percebidos (cinco questões) e barreiras percebidas (cinco questões). Adicionalmente, incluímos uma quinta dimensão, a qual denominamos motivação pró-saúde (quatro questões). As questões definiram um questionário eletrônico que foi divulgado por redes sociais pelo período de uma semana. As respostas foram valores quantitativos de representações subjetivas, obtidas por meio de uma escala psicofísica de razão com ancoragem verbal (CentiMax®). O tempo médio total de preenchimento foi de 12 minutos (desvio-padrão = 1,6). RESULTADOS: Obtivemos 277 respostas completas ao formulário. Uma foi excluída por se tratar de participante com menos de 18 anos de idade. Medidas de reprodutibilidade foram significantes para 22 das 24 questões de nosso questionário (α de Cronbach = 0,883). A validade convergente foi atestada pelo coeficiente de correlação de Spearman-Brown split half (r = 0,882). Diferenças significantes entre grupos foram encontradas mais intensamente nas dimensões susceptibilidade percebida e severidade percebida, e menos intensamente para benefícios percebidos e barreiras percebidas. CONCLUSÃO: Nosso questionário baseado no modelo de crença em saúde utilizando medidas quantitativas permitiu evidenciar as crenças populares sobre os riscos de contágio por covid-19. A vantagem de nossa abordagem é a possibilidade de se identificar os perfis de crença individuais para cada dimensão do questionário de forma rápida, direta e quantitativa, podendo ser uma grande aliada em processos de comunicação e educação em saúde pública.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2020-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/16951910.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 471518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160537https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160538https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160539Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Marcelo Fernandes2020-05-10T14:14:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/169519Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2020-05-10T14:14:05Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
Modelo de crença em saúde para determinantes de risco para contaminação por coronavírus
title Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
spellingShingle Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
: Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle
Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia
Comportamento de Redução do Risco
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
title_short Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_full Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_fullStr Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_full_unstemmed Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_sort Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
author Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
author_facet Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv : Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle
Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia
Comportamento de Redução do Risco
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
topic : Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle
Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia
Comportamento de Redução do Risco
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
description OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519
10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160537
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160538
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160539
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 47
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221801297477632