Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education. |
id |
USP-23_59f5c360dafe49b46ce03f37560691c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/169519 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinantsModelo de crença em saúde para determinantes de risco para contaminação por coronavírus: Coronavirus Infections, prevention & controlCoronavirus Infections, psychologyRisk Reduction BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controleInfecções por Coronavirus, psicologiaComportamento de Redução do RiscoConhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em SaúdeOBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.OBJETIVO: Neste estudo buscamos utilizar as vantagens de uma escala de razão por ancoragem verbal para medidas da percepção de risco de contágio pelo novo coronavírus, causador da covid-19, em um questionário baseado no modelo de crença em saúde, assim como avaliar sua validade e reprodutibilidade. MÉTODO: Utilizamos o modelo de crença em saúde, o qual explora quatro dimensões: percepção individual de susceptibilidade percebida (cinco questões), severidade percebida (cinco questões), benefícios percebidos (cinco questões) e barreiras percebidas (cinco questões). Adicionalmente, incluímos uma quinta dimensão, a qual denominamos motivação pró-saúde (quatro questões). As questões definiram um questionário eletrônico que foi divulgado por redes sociais pelo período de uma semana. As respostas foram valores quantitativos de representações subjetivas, obtidas por meio de uma escala psicofísica de razão com ancoragem verbal (CentiMax®). O tempo médio total de preenchimento foi de 12 minutos (desvio-padrão = 1,6). RESULTADOS: Obtivemos 277 respostas completas ao formulário. Uma foi excluída por se tratar de participante com menos de 18 anos de idade. Medidas de reprodutibilidade foram significantes para 22 das 24 questões de nosso questionário (α de Cronbach = 0,883). A validade convergente foi atestada pelo coeficiente de correlação de Spearman-Brown split half (r = 0,882). Diferenças significantes entre grupos foram encontradas mais intensamente nas dimensões susceptibilidade percebida e severidade percebida, e menos intensamente para benefícios percebidos e barreiras percebidas. CONCLUSÃO: Nosso questionário baseado no modelo de crença em saúde utilizando medidas quantitativas permitiu evidenciar as crenças populares sobre os riscos de contágio por covid-19. A vantagem de nossa abordagem é a possibilidade de se identificar os perfis de crença individuais para cada dimensão do questionário de forma rápida, direta e quantitativa, podendo ser uma grande aliada em processos de comunicação e educação em saúde pública.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2020-05-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/16951910.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 471518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160537https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160538https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160539Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Marcelo Fernandes2020-05-10T14:14:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/169519Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2020-05-10T14:14:05Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants Modelo de crença em saúde para determinantes de risco para contaminação por coronavírus |
title |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
spellingShingle |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants Costa, Marcelo Fernandes : Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control Coronavirus Infections, psychology Risk Reduction Behavior Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia Comportamento de Redução do Risco Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde |
title_short |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
title_full |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
title_fullStr |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
title_sort |
Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants |
author |
Costa, Marcelo Fernandes |
author_facet |
Costa, Marcelo Fernandes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Marcelo Fernandes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
: Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control Coronavirus Infections, psychology Risk Reduction Behavior Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia Comportamento de Redução do Risco Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde |
topic |
: Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control Coronavirus Infections, psychology Risk Reduction Behavior Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Infecções por Coronavirus, prevenção & controle Infecções por Coronavirus, psicologia Comportamento de Redução do Risco Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002494 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160537 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160538 https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/169519/160539 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Saúde Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47 Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 54 (2020); 47 Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 54 (2020); 47 1518-8787 0034-8910 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221801297477632 |