COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3177
Resumo: This paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme “COVID-19” in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.
id SCI-1_336d132c63ea4b598e662256a2c46348
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3177
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICACOVID-19 Y PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS EN EL PODER JUDICIAL FEDERAL: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICACOVID-19 E TUTELA DE DIREITOS NA JUSTIÇA FEDERAL: ATORES, INTERESSES E TEMAS DA JUDICIALIZAÇÃO DA PANDEMIA: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICACOVID-19Justiça Federal BrasileiraPolítica JudicialDireitosPolarizaçãoJurimetriaCOVID-19Brazilian Federal JudiciaryJudicial PoliticsRightsPolarizationJurimetricsCOVID-19Justicia Federal BrasileñaPolítica JudicialDerechosPolarizaciónJurimetriaThis paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme “COVID-19” in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.Este trabajo estima un modelo estadístico que explica los factores que han determinado la tutela judicial de derechos en casos relacionados con el tema “COVID-19” en el Poder Judicial Federal de Brasil. Utilizando el método de análisis estadístico multinivel, los resultados revelaron que las probabilidades de obtener protección judicial dependen de una interacción compleja entre características procesales que identifican los perfiles de los autores, sus intereses subyacentes y el tema involucrado en la discusión. Los análisis de los diferentes perfiles de litigios también arrojaron que los estados, el Distrito Federal y los municipios fueron los autores más exitosos en la obtención de decisiones judiciales favorables en demandas asociadas al tema de flexibilización de la aplicación de las normas legales. El modelo también sugiere que el Poder Judicial Federal no se permitió contaminarse con la “polarización”, prefiriendo, por razones legales, el mantenimiento del statu quo a la asignación de derechos a favor de los autores de cualquiera de los extremos del momento político actual.Este artigo estima um modelo estatístico explicativo dos fatores que determinaram a tutela judicial de direitos em casos relacionados com o tema “COVID-19” na Justiça Federal do Brasil. Por meio do uso de um método de análise estatística multinível, os resultados revelaram que as probabilidades de obtenção da tutela judicial dependeram de uma complexa interação entre características processuais que identificam os perfis de autores, seus interesses subjacentes e o tema envolvido na discussão. Análises dos diferentes perfis de ações judiciais também evidenciaram que estados, Distrito Federal e municípios foram os autores de maior sucesso na obtenção de decisões judiciais favoráveis em demandas associadas com o tema da flexibilização da aplicação de regras jurídicas. Evidências ainda sugerem que a Justiça Federal não se deixou contaminar com a “polarização”, preferindo, por razões jurídicas, a manutenção do status quo a alocar direitos em favor de autores de qualquer dos extremos do momento político atual.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/317710.1590/SciELOPreprints.3177porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3177/5720Copyright (c) 2021 Ricardo Ribeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Ricardoreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-11-10T16:04:14Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3177Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-11-10T16:04:14SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
COVID-19 Y PROTECCIÓN DE DERECHOS EN EL PODER JUDICIAL FEDERAL: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
COVID-19 E TUTELA DE DIREITOS NA JUSTIÇA FEDERAL: ATORES, INTERESSES E TEMAS DA JUDICIALIZAÇÃO DA PANDEMIA: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
title COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
spellingShingle COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
Ribeiro, Ricardo
COVID-19
Justiça Federal Brasileira
Política Judicial
Direitos
Polarização
Jurimetria
COVID-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
Judicial Politics
Rights
Polarization
Jurimetrics
COVID-19
Justicia Federal Brasileña
Política Judicial
Derechos
Polarización
Jurimetria
title_short COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
title_full COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
title_fullStr COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
title_sort COVID-19 AND PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN FEDERAL JUDICIARY: ACTORS, INTERESTS AND ISSUE AREAS OF THE PANDEMIC JUDICIALIZATION: ACTORES, INTERESES Y ÁREAS TEMÁTICAS DE LA JUDICIALIZACIÓN PANDÉMICA
author Ribeiro, Ricardo
author_facet Ribeiro, Ricardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Justiça Federal Brasileira
Política Judicial
Direitos
Polarização
Jurimetria
COVID-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
Judicial Politics
Rights
Polarization
Jurimetrics
COVID-19
Justicia Federal Brasileña
Política Judicial
Derechos
Polarización
Jurimetria
topic COVID-19
Justiça Federal Brasileira
Política Judicial
Direitos
Polarização
Jurimetria
COVID-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
Judicial Politics
Rights
Polarization
Jurimetrics
COVID-19
Justicia Federal Brasileña
Política Judicial
Derechos
Polarización
Jurimetria
description This paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme “COVID-19” in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3177
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3177
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3177
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3177
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3177/5720
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ricardo Ribeiro
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Ricardo Ribeiro
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047825699176448

Registros relacionados