Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832
Resumo: This paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme covid-19 in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.
id FGV-2_02f9c1f4de9a9de8139ceed828e7be6a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89832
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic JudicializationCovid-19 e tutela de direitos na Justiça Federal: atores, interesses e temas da judicialização da pandemiaCovid-19Brazilian Federal Judiciaryjudicial politicspolarizationrightsCovid-19Justiça Federal brasileirapolítica judicialpolarizaçãodireitosThis paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme covid-19 in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.Este artigo estima um modelo estatístico explicativo dos fatores que determinaram a tutela judicial de direitos em casos relacionados ao tema covid-19 na Justiça Federal do Brasil. Por meio do uso de um método de análise estatística multinível, os resultados revelaram que as probabilidades de obtenção da tutela judicial dependeram de uma complexa interação entre características processuais que identificam os perfis de autores, seus interesses subjacentes e o tema envolvido na discussão. Análises dos diferentes perfis de ações judiciais também evidenciaram que estados, Distrito Federal e municípios foram os autores de maior sucesso na obtenção de decisões judiciais favoráveis em demandas associadas ao tema da flexibilização da aplicação de regras jurídicas. Evidências ainda sugerem que a Justiça Federal não se deixou contaminar com a “polarização”, preferindo, por razões jurídicas, a manutenção do status quo a alocar direitos em favor de autores de qualquer um dos extremos do momento político atual.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2324Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2324Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23242317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832/84310Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-27T12:39:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/89832Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-09-27T12:39:14Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
Covid-19 e tutela de direitos na Justiça Federal: atores, interesses e temas da judicialização da pandemia
title Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
spellingShingle Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardo
Covid-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
judicial politics
polarization
rights
Covid-19
Justiça Federal brasileira
política judicial
polarização
direitos
title_short Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
title_full Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
title_fullStr Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
title_full_unstemmed Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
title_sort Covid-19 and Protection of Rights in Federal Judiciary: Actors, Interests and Issue Areas of the Pandemic Judicialization
author Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardo
author_facet Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira Ribeiro, Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Covid-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
judicial politics
polarization
rights
Covid-19
Justiça Federal brasileira
política judicial
polarização
direitos
topic Covid-19
Brazilian Federal Judiciary
judicial politics
polarization
rights
Covid-19
Justiça Federal brasileira
política judicial
polarização
direitos
description This paper estimates a statistical model that explains the factors that have determined the judicial protection of rights in cases related to the theme covid-19 in the Brazilian Federal Judiciary. Using multilevel statistical analysis method, the results revealed that the probabilities of obtaining judicial protection depends of a complex interaction between procedural characteristics that identify the profiles of authors, their underlying interests and the topic involved in the discussion. Analyses of the different lawsuit profiles also showed that states, the Federal District and municipalities were the most successful authors in obtaining favorable judicial decisions in demands associated with the subject of making the application of legal rules more flexible. The model also suggests that the Federal Judiciary did not allow itself to be contaminated with “polarization”, preferring, for legal reasons, the maintenance of the status quo to allocating rights in favor of authors from any of the extremes of the current political moment.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/89832/84310
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2324
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2324
Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2324
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943711188484096

Registros relacionados