Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567 |
Resumo: | The objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study. |
id |
SCI-1_77e150078675bc046f33eba10531e663 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3567 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPESLineamientos, Recomendaciones para programas de posgrado para obtener el máximo impacto con CAPESDiretrizes, Recomendações para os programas de pós-graduação obterem o máximo de impacto junto à CAPESAvaliação de Ensino SuperiorEducação SuperiorGovernança UniversitáriaGestão AcadêmicaHigher Education EvaluationHigher EducationUniversity GovernanceEvaluación de la Educación SuperiorEducación SuperiorGobernanza UniversitariaGestión AcadémicaThe objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study.El objetivo de la presente investigación es sugerir cómo diseñar, según las reglas de evaluación de la Capes, programas Académicos y Profesionales en las áreas de Ingeniería-III y Administración Pública y Empresarial, Ciencias Contables y Turismo. El objetivo es ayudar en la planificación de estos programas de posgrado para que sean sostenibles desde el punto de vista de la evaluación. Las reglas de evaluación varían mucho entre las distintas áreas de la Capes, lo que imposibilita un estudio general para todas las áreas de conocimiento. Entonces, se decidió considerar las áreas de Ingeniería III y Administración Pública y de Empresas, Ciencias Contables y Turismo, por ser áreas que suelen tener gran interés en los programas profesionales. Se realizará un estudio comparativo de los criterios de evaluación, buscando identificar el perfil ideal de profesores para los Programas Académicos y Profesionales en las dos áreas analizadas. Es importante recordar que Capes introdujo cambios en la evaluación en 2021, buscando alinear esta evaluación con las declaraciones internacionales sobre este tema y tener un mayor enfoque en la calidad en lugar de la cantidad de productos. En este proceso se deben tener en cuenta otros criterios relacionados con los objetivos y misiones institucionales, pero es una situación que se debe estudiar individualmente y no es posible incluirlos en el presente estudio.O objetivo do presente trabalho é sugerir formas de fazer um planejamento, de acordo com as regras avaliativas da Capes, de programas acadêmicos e profissionais nas áreas de Engenharias-III e Administração Pública e de Empresas, Ciências Contábeis e Turismo. O objetivo é ajudar no planejamento desses Programas de pós-graduação para que sejam sustentáveis do ponto de vista de avaliação. As regras avaliativas variam bastante entre as diferentes áreas da Capes, o que torna impossível um estudo geral para todas as áreas do conhecimento. Sendo assim, optou-se por considerar as áreas de Engenharias III e Administração Pública e de Empresas, Ciências Contábeis e Turismo, pois são áreas que tendem a despertar grande interesse por programas profissionais. Será feito um estudo comparativo dos critérios de avaliação, buscando identificar o perfil ideal de docentes para os Programas Acadêmico e Profissional nas duas áreas analisadas. É importante lembrar que a Capes introduziu mudanças na avaliação em 2021, buscando alinhar a avaliação com manifestos internacionais sobre o assunto e ter um foco maior em qualidade do que em quantidade de produtos. Outros critérios ligados aos objetivos e missões institucionais devem ser levados em conta nesse processo, mas é uma situação que deve ser estudada individualmente e não é possível incluí-las no presente estudo.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/356710.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3567/6573Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moréhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrado, AntonioBianchi, Isaías ScalabrinMoré, Rafael Pereira Ocamporeponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-02-04T01:52:14Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3567Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-02-04T01:52:14SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES Lineamientos, Recomendaciones para programas de posgrado para obtener el máximo impacto con CAPES Diretrizes, Recomendações para os programas de pós-graduação obterem o máximo de impacto junto à CAPES |
title |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
spellingShingle |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES Prado, Antonio Avaliação de Ensino Superior Educação Superior Governança Universitária Gestão Acadêmica Higher Education Evaluation Higher Education University Governance Evaluación de la Educación Superior Educación Superior Gobernanza Universitaria Gestión Académica |
title_short |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
title_full |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
title_fullStr |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
title_full_unstemmed |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
title_sort |
Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES |
author |
Prado, Antonio |
author_facet |
Prado, Antonio Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prado, Antonio Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação de Ensino Superior Educação Superior Governança Universitária Gestão Acadêmica Higher Education Evaluation Higher Education University Governance Evaluación de la Educación Superior Educación Superior Gobernanza Universitaria Gestión Académica |
topic |
Avaliação de Ensino Superior Educação Superior Governança Universitária Gestão Acadêmica Higher Education Evaluation Higher Education University Governance Evaluación de la Educación Superior Educación Superior Gobernanza Universitaria Gestión Académica |
description |
The objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3567/6573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moré https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moré https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047827124191232 |