Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Prado, Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin, Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567
Resumo: The objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study.
id SCI-1_77e150078675bc046f33eba10531e663
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3567
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPESLineamientos, Recomendaciones para programas de posgrado para obtener el máximo impacto con CAPESDiretrizes, Recomendações para os programas de pós-graduação obterem o máximo de impacto junto à CAPESAvaliação de Ensino SuperiorEducação SuperiorGovernança UniversitáriaGestão AcadêmicaHigher Education EvaluationHigher EducationUniversity GovernanceEvaluación de la Educación SuperiorEducación SuperiorGobernanza UniversitariaGestión AcadémicaThe objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study.El objetivo de la presente investigación es sugerir cómo diseñar, según las reglas de evaluación de la Capes, programas Académicos y Profesionales en las áreas de Ingeniería-III y Administración Pública y Empresarial, Ciencias Contables y Turismo. El objetivo es ayudar en la planificación de estos programas de posgrado para que sean sostenibles desde el punto de vista de la evaluación. Las reglas de evaluación varían mucho entre las distintas áreas de la Capes, lo que imposibilita un estudio general para todas las áreas de conocimiento. Entonces, se decidió considerar las áreas de Ingeniería III y Administración Pública y de Empresas, Ciencias Contables y Turismo, por ser áreas que suelen tener gran interés en los programas profesionales. Se realizará un estudio comparativo de los criterios de evaluación, buscando identificar el perfil ideal de profesores para los Programas Académicos y Profesionales en las dos áreas analizadas. Es importante recordar que Capes introdujo cambios en la evaluación en 2021, buscando alinear esta evaluación con las declaraciones internacionales sobre este tema y tener un mayor enfoque en la calidad en lugar de la cantidad de productos. En este proceso se deben tener en cuenta otros criterios relacionados con los objetivos y misiones institucionales, pero es una situación que se debe estudiar individualmente y no es posible incluirlos en el presente estudio.O objetivo do presente trabalho é sugerir formas de fazer um planejamento, de acordo com as regras avaliativas da Capes, de programas acadêmicos e profissionais nas áreas de Engenharias-III e Administração Pública e de Empresas, Ciências Contábeis e Turismo. O objetivo é ajudar no planejamento desses Programas de pós-graduação para que sejam sustentáveis do ponto de vista de avaliação. As regras avaliativas variam bastante entre as diferentes áreas da Capes, o que torna impossível um estudo geral para todas as áreas do conhecimento. Sendo assim, optou-se por considerar as áreas de Engenharias III e Administração Pública e de Empresas, Ciências Contábeis e Turismo, pois são áreas que tendem a despertar grande interesse por programas profissionais. Será feito um estudo comparativo dos critérios de avaliação, buscando identificar o perfil ideal de docentes para os Programas Acadêmico e Profissional nas duas áreas analisadas. É importante lembrar que a Capes introduziu mudanças na avaliação em 2021, buscando alinhar a avaliação com manifestos internacionais sobre o assunto e ter um foco maior em qualidade do que em quantidade de produtos. Outros critérios ligados aos objetivos e missões institucionais devem ser levados em conta nesse processo, mas é uma situação que deve ser estudada individualmente e não é possível incluí-las no presente estudo.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-02-14info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/356710.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3567/6573Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moréhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPrado, AntonioBianchi, Isaías ScalabrinMoré, Rafael Pereira Ocamporeponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-02-04T01:52:14Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3567Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-02-04T01:52:14SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
Lineamientos, Recomendaciones para programas de posgrado para obtener el máximo impacto con CAPES
Diretrizes, Recomendações para os programas de pós-graduação obterem o máximo de impacto junto à CAPES
title Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
spellingShingle Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
Prado, Antonio
Avaliação de Ensino Superior
Educação Superior
Governança Universitária
Gestão Acadêmica
Higher Education Evaluation
Higher Education
University Governance
Evaluación de la Educación Superior
Educación Superior
Gobernanza Universitaria
Gestión Académica
title_short Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
title_full Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
title_fullStr Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
title_sort Guidelines, Recommendations for postgraduate programs to obtain maximum impact with CAPES
author Prado, Antonio
author_facet Prado, Antonio
Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin
Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo
author_role author
author2 Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin
Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prado, Antonio
Bianchi, Isaías Scalabrin
Moré, Rafael Pereira Ocampo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação de Ensino Superior
Educação Superior
Governança Universitária
Gestão Acadêmica
Higher Education Evaluation
Higher Education
University Governance
Evaluación de la Educación Superior
Educación Superior
Gobernanza Universitaria
Gestión Académica
topic Avaliação de Ensino Superior
Educação Superior
Governança Universitária
Gestão Acadêmica
Higher Education Evaluation
Higher Education
University Governance
Evaluación de la Educación Superior
Educación Superior
Gobernanza Universitaria
Gestión Académica
description The objective of the present research is to suggest how to design, according to Capes' evaluation rules, Academic and Professional programs in the areas of Engineering-III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism. The objective is to help in the planning of these graduate Programs such that they are sustainable from an evaluation point of view. The evaluation rules vary a lot among the different areas of Capes, which makes a general study for all areas of knowledge impossible. Therefore, it was decided to consider the areas of Engineering III and Public and Business Administration, Accounting Sciences and Tourism, as these are areas that tend to have great interest in professional programs. A comparative study of the evaluation criteria will be carried out, seeking to identify the ideal profile of professors for the Academic and Professional Programs in the two areas analyzed. It is important to remember that Capes introduced changes in the evaluation in 2021, seeking to align this evaluation with international declarations on this topic and to have a greater focus on quality instead of quantity of products. Other criteria related to institutional objectives and missions must be taken into account in this process, but it is a situation that must be studied individually and it is not possible to include them in the present study.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3567
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3567
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3567/6573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moré
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Antonio Prado, Isaías Scalabrin Bianchi, Rafael Pereira Ocampo Moré
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047827124191232