Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/513
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.
id SCI-1_78bbb0c103745a4dbdd695232e14d43c
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/513
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinantsCoronavirus Infections, prevention & controlCoronavirus Infections, psychologyRisk Reduction BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/513enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/513/645Copyright (c) 2020 Marcelo Fernandes Costahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Marcelo Fernandesreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-05-18T16:28:02Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/513Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-05-18T16:28:02SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
spellingShingle Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
title_short Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_full Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_fullStr Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_full_unstemmed Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
title_sort Health belief model for coronavirus infection risk determinants
author Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
author_facet Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
topic Coronavirus Infections, prevention & control
Coronavirus Infections, psychology
Risk Reduction Behavior
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
description OBJECTIVE: To use the advantages of a ratio scale with verbal anchors in order to measure the risk perception in the novel coronavirus infection, which causes covid-19, in a health belief model-based questionnaire, as well as its validity and reproducibility. METHOD: We used the health belief model, which explores four dimensions: perceived susceptibility (five questions), perceived severity (five questions), perceived benefits (five questions), and perceived barriers (five questions). Additionally, we included a fifth dimension, called pro-health motivation (four questions). The questions composed an electronic questionnaire disseminated by social networks for an one-week period. Answers were quantitative values of subjective representations, obtained by a psychophysically constructed scale with verbal anchors ratio (CentiMax®). Mean time for total filling was 12 minutes (standard deviation = 1.6). RESULTS: We obtained 277 complete responses to the form. One was excluded because it belonged to a participant under 18 years old. Reproducibility measures were significant for 22 of the 24 questions in our questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = 0.883). Convergent validity was attested by Spearman-Brown’s split half reliability coefficient (r = 0.882). Significant differences among groups were more intense in perceived susceptibility and severity dimensions, and less in perceived benefits and barriers. CONCLUSION: Our health belief model-based questionnaire using quantitative measures enabled the confirmation of popular beliefs about covid-19 infection risks. The advantage in our approach lays in the possibility of quickly, directly and quantitatively identifying individual belief profiles for each dimension in the questionnaire, serving as a great ally for communication processes and public health education.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/513
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/513
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/513/645
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marcelo Fernandes Costa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Marcelo Fernandes Costa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047817866313728