“IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ares, Graziela
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Grinspum, Denise
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6815
Resumo: The reconfiguration of Kossuth Square in Budapest began in 2011. The objective was to return the square to the way it looked in 1944, the year in which the preamble of the 2010 Constitution states that Hungary lost its sovereignty. To the detriment of its contemporaneity, authenticity, harmony, and heritage value, the square and its elements were reorganized individually and collectively to meet the political strategy of Viktor Orbán’s government. Our research investigates the transfer in 2014 of the symbolic grave of the victims of the 1956 massacre, constructed by Laszló Gömbos and Imre Makovesz in 1991, from the square to the memorial exhibition “In memoriam 1956. Október 25.”. The space was built by the Imre Steindl Program in the basement of the square. We use the definition of museum published by ICOM and the literature on memory studies and symbolic politics in post-democratization Hungary to analyze the process of change of the monument and question whether the museum was used as a place to preserve memory or one more space of territorial dominance and power. Our sources were the bibliographical review, visits to the square over the last decade, and the online search for keywords expanded into a “snowball” method. Based on a critical assessment and problematization of the new configuration of Kossuth Square resulting from the interventions by the Steindl Program, we intend to demonstrate how the promise to “better accommodate heritage and memory” can contribute to the control over the discourses of memories of the 1956 Revolution.
id SCI-1_8f290ccbbfbb6864af3627808b512ff7
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6815
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST“IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: O MUSEU COMO INSTRUMENTO DE ESQUECIMENTO EM BUDAPESTEestudos da memóriapolítica simbólicamuseurevolução de 1956espaços públicosmemory studiessymbolic politicsmuseum1956 revolutionpublic spacesThe reconfiguration of Kossuth Square in Budapest began in 2011. The objective was to return the square to the way it looked in 1944, the year in which the preamble of the 2010 Constitution states that Hungary lost its sovereignty. To the detriment of its contemporaneity, authenticity, harmony, and heritage value, the square and its elements were reorganized individually and collectively to meet the political strategy of Viktor Orbán’s government. Our research investigates the transfer in 2014 of the symbolic grave of the victims of the 1956 massacre, constructed by Laszló Gömbos and Imre Makovesz in 1991, from the square to the memorial exhibition “In memoriam 1956. Október 25.”. The space was built by the Imre Steindl Program in the basement of the square. We use the definition of museum published by ICOM and the literature on memory studies and symbolic politics in post-democratization Hungary to analyze the process of change of the monument and question whether the museum was used as a place to preserve memory or one more space of territorial dominance and power. Our sources were the bibliographical review, visits to the square over the last decade, and the online search for keywords expanded into a “snowball” method. Based on a critical assessment and problematization of the new configuration of Kossuth Square resulting from the interventions by the Steindl Program, we intend to demonstrate how the promise to “better accommodate heritage and memory” can contribute to the control over the discourses of memories of the 1956 Revolution.Em 2011, iniciou-se a reconfiguração da Praça Kossuth em Budapeste. O objetivo era devolver à Praça a imagem que tinha em 1944, ano em que o preâmbulo da Constituição de 2010 afirma que a Hungria perdeu a sua soberania. Em detrimento da sua contemporaneidade, autenticidade, harmonia e valor de patrimônio, a Praça e seus elementos foram reorganizados individual e coletivamente para atender à estratégia política do governo de Viktor Orbán. Nossa pesquisa investiga a transferência em 2014 do túmulo simbólico das vítimas do massacre de 1956, uma obra de Laszló Gömbos e Imre Makovesz de 1991, da Praça para a exibição-memorial “In memoriam 1956. Október 25.”, construído pelo Programa Imre Steindl no subsolo da Praça. Usamos como referência a definição de museu divulgada pelo ICOM e a literatura dos estudos da memória e da política simbólica húngara pós democratização para analisar o processo de mudança e problematizar se o museu foi utilizado como um lugar de preservação da memória ou um lugar de domínio territorial e poder. A revisão bibliográfica, as visitas à Praça na última década e a busca online por palavras-chave ampliada em método de “bola de neve” foram as nossas fontes de pesquisa. A partir de uma avaliação crítica e a problematização da nova configuração da Praça resultante das intervenções do Programa Steindl, pretendemos demonstrar como a promessa de “melhor acomodar o patrimônio e a memória” pode contribuir para o controle sobre os discursos das memórias da Revolução de 1956.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2023-09-18info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/681510.1590/SciELOPreprints.6815porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6815/12880Copyright (c) 2023 Graziela Ares, Denise Grinspumhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAres, GrazielaGrinspum, Denisereponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2023-09-12T18:54:56Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/6815Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2023-09-12T18:54:56SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
“IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: O MUSEU COMO INSTRUMENTO DE ESQUECIMENTO EM BUDAPESTE
title “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
spellingShingle “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
Ares, Graziela
estudos da memória
política simbólica
museu
revolução de 1956
espaços públicos
memory studies
symbolic politics
museum
1956 revolution
public spaces
title_short “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
title_full “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
title_fullStr “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
title_full_unstemmed “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
title_sort “IN MEMORIAM 1956. OKTÓBER 25.”: THE MUSEUM AS AN INSTRUMENT TO FORGET IN BUDAPEST
author Ares, Graziela
author_facet Ares, Graziela
Grinspum, Denise
author_role author
author2 Grinspum, Denise
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ares, Graziela
Grinspum, Denise
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv estudos da memória
política simbólica
museu
revolução de 1956
espaços públicos
memory studies
symbolic politics
museum
1956 revolution
public spaces
topic estudos da memória
política simbólica
museu
revolução de 1956
espaços públicos
memory studies
symbolic politics
museum
1956 revolution
public spaces
description The reconfiguration of Kossuth Square in Budapest began in 2011. The objective was to return the square to the way it looked in 1944, the year in which the preamble of the 2010 Constitution states that Hungary lost its sovereignty. To the detriment of its contemporaneity, authenticity, harmony, and heritage value, the square and its elements were reorganized individually and collectively to meet the political strategy of Viktor Orbán’s government. Our research investigates the transfer in 2014 of the symbolic grave of the victims of the 1956 massacre, constructed by Laszló Gömbos and Imre Makovesz in 1991, from the square to the memorial exhibition “In memoriam 1956. Október 25.”. The space was built by the Imre Steindl Program in the basement of the square. We use the definition of museum published by ICOM and the literature on memory studies and symbolic politics in post-democratization Hungary to analyze the process of change of the monument and question whether the museum was used as a place to preserve memory or one more space of territorial dominance and power. Our sources were the bibliographical review, visits to the square over the last decade, and the online search for keywords expanded into a “snowball” method. Based on a critical assessment and problematization of the new configuration of Kossuth Square resulting from the interventions by the Steindl Program, we intend to demonstrate how the promise to “better accommodate heritage and memory” can contribute to the control over the discourses of memories of the 1956 Revolution.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6815
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6815
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/6815
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.6815
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/6815/12880
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Graziela Ares, Denise Grinspum
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Graziela Ares, Denise Grinspum
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron:SCI
instname_str Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047812925423616