COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assunção, Ada
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Simoes, Mariana, Maia, Emanuella, Alcântara, Marcus, Jardim, Renata
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1018
Resumo: Aim: Comparing national protocols and Brazilian state protocols about how, when and which sort of individual protection equipment’s should be used during the assistance of the patients infected with the COVID 19, as well as developing a criticism of the predominant model of implantation that guides the structure of these protocols. Methods: Exploratory study in line with the short period (two months) since the recognizing of the pandemic character of the sanitary crisis. The results available in the Cochrane´s Library had articulated with elements of protocols from Argentina, Brazil, China, United States of America, and states of Amazonas, Bahia, Minas Gerais and São Paulo, all of them selected by convenience. Results: It had observed disagreement, mainly related with the sort of indicated respiratory protection. Only in China the high potency of filtration respirators has indicated, besides models covering the whole face for invasive procedures. Except for São Paulo, the others states do not recommend reuse of equipment. There is no convergence for the materials of the clothing items. Conclusion: The results are tips for the health care professionals’ protocols’ for the new coronavirus review.
id SCI-1_9f32750c18359abf26924ac82b22a0bd
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1018
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionalsCOVID-19: Limites na implantação dos equipamentos de proteção individuais recomendados aos profissionais de saúde COVID-19Equipamento de Proteção IndividualPessoal de SaúdeSaúde dos trabalhadoresCovid19healthcare professionalsworkers healthpersonal protective equipmentAim: Comparing national protocols and Brazilian state protocols about how, when and which sort of individual protection equipment’s should be used during the assistance of the patients infected with the COVID 19, as well as developing a criticism of the predominant model of implantation that guides the structure of these protocols. Methods: Exploratory study in line with the short period (two months) since the recognizing of the pandemic character of the sanitary crisis. The results available in the Cochrane´s Library had articulated with elements of protocols from Argentina, Brazil, China, United States of America, and states of Amazonas, Bahia, Minas Gerais and São Paulo, all of them selected by convenience. Results: It had observed disagreement, mainly related with the sort of indicated respiratory protection. Only in China the high potency of filtration respirators has indicated, besides models covering the whole face for invasive procedures. Except for São Paulo, the others states do not recommend reuse of equipment. There is no convergence for the materials of the clothing items. Conclusion: The results are tips for the health care professionals’ protocols’ for the new coronavirus review.Objetivo: Comparar protocolos nacionais e protocolos nacionais brasileiros sobre quando, como e que tipo de equipamentos de proteção indivíduos utilizam durante a assistência aos pacientes do COVID-19, bem como desenvolver uma crítica ao modelo predominante de implantação desses equipamentos que orientam a estrutura desses protocolos . Métodos: Estudo exploratório, em consonância a um curto período (dois meses) desde o reconhecimento de caracteres pandêmicos da crise sanitária, resultados de análises disponíveis na Biblioteca Cochrane com elementos dos protocolos da Argentina, Brasil, China e Estados Unidos da América e Estados do Amazonas, Bahia, Minas Gerais e São Paulo, todos selecionados por conveniência. Resultados: Observe-se dissenso, principalmente quanto ao tipo de proteção respiratória indicada. Somente na China pode usar respiradores de alta potência de filtragem, além de modelos para o rosto inteiro nos casos de procedimentos invasivos. Os estados brasileiros, com exceção de São Paulo, não recomendam reuso de equipamentos. Quanto aos materiais dos itens de vestuário, não há convergência. Conclusão: Os resultados são pistas para a revisão de protocolos de proteção de profissionais da saúde ao novo coronavírus.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/101810.1590/SciELOPreprints.1018porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1018/1465Copyright (c) 2020 Ada Assunção, Mariana Simoes, Emanuella Maia, Marcus Alcântara, Renata Jardimhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssunção, AdaSimoes, MarianaMaia, EmanuellaAlcântara, MarcusJardim, Renatareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-07-24T23:10:01Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/1018Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-07-24T23:10:01SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
COVID-19: Limites na implantação dos equipamentos de proteção individuais recomendados aos profissionais de saúde
title COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
spellingShingle COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
Assunção, Ada
COVID-19
Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Pessoal de Saúde
Saúde dos trabalhadores
Covid19
healthcare professionals
workers health
personal protective equipment
title_short COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
title_full COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
title_fullStr COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
title_sort COVID-19: Limits on the implementation of personal protective equipments recommended to health care professionals
author Assunção, Ada
author_facet Assunção, Ada
Simoes, Mariana
Maia, Emanuella
Alcântara, Marcus
Jardim, Renata
author_role author
author2 Simoes, Mariana
Maia, Emanuella
Alcântara, Marcus
Jardim, Renata
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assunção, Ada
Simoes, Mariana
Maia, Emanuella
Alcântara, Marcus
Jardim, Renata
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Pessoal de Saúde
Saúde dos trabalhadores
Covid19
healthcare professionals
workers health
personal protective equipment
topic COVID-19
Equipamento de Proteção Individual
Pessoal de Saúde
Saúde dos trabalhadores
Covid19
healthcare professionals
workers health
personal protective equipment
description Aim: Comparing national protocols and Brazilian state protocols about how, when and which sort of individual protection equipment’s should be used during the assistance of the patients infected with the COVID 19, as well as developing a criticism of the predominant model of implantation that guides the structure of these protocols. Methods: Exploratory study in line with the short period (two months) since the recognizing of the pandemic character of the sanitary crisis. The results available in the Cochrane´s Library had articulated with elements of protocols from Argentina, Brazil, China, United States of America, and states of Amazonas, Bahia, Minas Gerais and São Paulo, all of them selected by convenience. Results: It had observed disagreement, mainly related with the sort of indicated respiratory protection. Only in China the high potency of filtration respirators has indicated, besides models covering the whole face for invasive procedures. Except for São Paulo, the others states do not recommend reuse of equipment. There is no convergence for the materials of the clothing items. Conclusion: The results are tips for the health care professionals’ protocols’ for the new coronavirus review.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1018
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1018
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1018
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/1018/1465
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ada Assunção, Mariana Simoes, Emanuella Maia, Marcus Alcântara, Renata Jardim
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Ada Assunção, Mariana Simoes, Emanuella Maia, Marcus Alcântara, Renata Jardim
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047819465392128