The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3319 |
Resumo: | The manuscript discusses the production of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM) for the last twenty years in the areas of scientific research, transfer of technology and innovation and diffusion of knowledge Throughout its history, the main scientific concern relates to the specification of political, institutional and symbolic mechanisms that explain both the reproduction and the overcoming of poverty and inequalities. The main contributions of CEM, either in the academic field or within the public debate, are presented in this manuscript around three topics. First, the findings on public policy analysis are detailed, including the political and partisan dimensions of governments. In common, all these analysis attempt to specify the effects of policies on social and political inclusion. In the second topic, research results on the studies of spatial distribution of social groups, their living conditions, and the specification of peripheries in urban and metropolitan settings are presented. Third, the manuscript theorises about what could be understood as Brazil’s paradox since the redemocratization in the 1980s: although the social welfare of the population has significantly increased in this period, the inequalities derived from the occupational structure (labour market) remain resilient as markers of income attainment and other forms of inequalities. At the end, some suggestions on further research agenda are made. |
id |
SCI-1_adad1640724bcd0a10bb02f411b29c37 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3319 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? Dos mecanismos de reprodução e de redução das desigualdades: o que aprendemos com as pesquisas do Centro de Estudos da Metrópole (CEM)?Políticas PúblicasDistribuição espacial de grupos sociaisCentro de Estudos da Metrópolepobreza e desigualdadespoverty and inequalitiespublic policiesspatial distribution of social groupscentre of metropolitan studiesThe manuscript discusses the production of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM) for the last twenty years in the areas of scientific research, transfer of technology and innovation and diffusion of knowledge Throughout its history, the main scientific concern relates to the specification of political, institutional and symbolic mechanisms that explain both the reproduction and the overcoming of poverty and inequalities. The main contributions of CEM, either in the academic field or within the public debate, are presented in this manuscript around three topics. First, the findings on public policy analysis are detailed, including the political and partisan dimensions of governments. In common, all these analysis attempt to specify the effects of policies on social and political inclusion. In the second topic, research results on the studies of spatial distribution of social groups, their living conditions, and the specification of peripheries in urban and metropolitan settings are presented. Third, the manuscript theorises about what could be understood as Brazil’s paradox since the redemocratization in the 1980s: although the social welfare of the population has significantly increased in this period, the inequalities derived from the occupational structure (labour market) remain resilient as markers of income attainment and other forms of inequalities. At the end, some suggestions on further research agenda are made.O texto trata da produção do Centro de Estudos da Metrópole (CEM) nos últimos vinte anos nas áreas de pesquisa científica, transferência de tecnologia e inovação e de difusão do conhecimento. Verifica-se o interesse, ao longo da trajetória de pesquisas do CEM, em especificar os mecanismos políticos, institucionais e simbólicos que explicam a reprodução ou a superação da pobreza e das desigualdades. As principais contribuições do CEM para o debate acadêmico e público foram organizadas em três tópicos. No primeiro, discute-se a contribuição das pesquisas na análise de políticas públicas, o que inclui a dimensão política e partidária de governos, tendo, em comum, a identificação de seus efeitos em termos de inclusão social e política. No segundo tópico, são destacados os estudos sobre a distribuição espacial de grupos sociais, das condições de vida e a especificação dos espaços periféricos urbanos e metropolitanos. No terceiro tópico, apresenta-se o que poderia ser entendido como o paradoxo do Brasil desde a redemocratização: embora as condições de bem-estar social tenham melhorado substantivamente, as desigualdades advindas da estrutura ocupacional permanecem resilientes como marcadores relevantes de diferenciação de acesso à renda e a outras formas de desigualdades. Ao final, são feitas sugestões de agendas de pesquisa para o futuro do CEM.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/331910.1590/SciELOPreprints.3319porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3319/5969Copyright (c) 2021 Sandra Gomeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes, Sandrareponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-12-03T19:19:43Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/3319Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-12-03T19:19:43SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? Dos mecanismos de reprodução e de redução das desigualdades: o que aprendemos com as pesquisas do Centro de Estudos da Metrópole (CEM)? |
title |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
spellingShingle |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? Gomes, Sandra Políticas Públicas Distribuição espacial de grupos sociais Centro de Estudos da Metrópole pobreza e desigualdades poverty and inequalities public policies spatial distribution of social groups centre of metropolitan studies |
title_short |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
title_full |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
title_fullStr |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
title_sort |
The mechanisms of reproduction and reduction of inequalities: what do we learn from the research of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)? |
author |
Gomes, Sandra |
author_facet |
Gomes, Sandra |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes, Sandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Políticas Públicas Distribuição espacial de grupos sociais Centro de Estudos da Metrópole pobreza e desigualdades poverty and inequalities public policies spatial distribution of social groups centre of metropolitan studies |
topic |
Políticas Públicas Distribuição espacial de grupos sociais Centro de Estudos da Metrópole pobreza e desigualdades poverty and inequalities public policies spatial distribution of social groups centre of metropolitan studies |
description |
The manuscript discusses the production of the Centre for Metropolitan Studies (CEM) for the last twenty years in the areas of scientific research, transfer of technology and innovation and diffusion of knowledge Throughout its history, the main scientific concern relates to the specification of political, institutional and symbolic mechanisms that explain both the reproduction and the overcoming of poverty and inequalities. The main contributions of CEM, either in the academic field or within the public debate, are presented in this manuscript around three topics. First, the findings on public policy analysis are detailed, including the political and partisan dimensions of governments. In common, all these analysis attempt to specify the effects of policies on social and political inclusion. In the second topic, research results on the studies of spatial distribution of social groups, their living conditions, and the specification of peripheries in urban and metropolitan settings are presented. Third, the manuscript theorises about what could be understood as Brazil’s paradox since the redemocratization in the 1980s: although the social welfare of the population has significantly increased in this period, the inequalities derived from the occupational structure (labour market) remain resilient as markers of income attainment and other forms of inequalities. At the end, some suggestions on further research agenda are made. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3319 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3319 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3319 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.3319 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/3319/5969 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Sandra Gomes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Sandra Gomes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047825863802880 |