Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Messias, Iracimara de Anchieta
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Nascimento, Adelaide, Rocha, Raoni
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2168
Resumo: This article presents an experience of a participative approach preliminary to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat products companies. Although the norms provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. The study was developed in the beef slaughtering sector using two complementary methods: observation of the work in loco, in order to select the jobs that are primarily eligible for the rotation, and a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of the rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers did not accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. As evidence of the advantages of the rotation, the variability in the work (30%), learning and gain of experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%) stand out. As disadvantages, the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%) stand out. We conclude that the participatory approach preliminary to the changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation, indicating improvement of processes in compliance with legal requirements.
id SCI-1_b4eddf17c001cbd1918e6f25aed70e9b
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2168
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workersRodízio de postos de trabalho como exigência legal: análise da aceitação e percepção de trabalhadores do abate de bovinos ParticipaçãoRotaçãoMatadouroPercepçãoTrabalhoParticipationRotationSlaughterhousePerceptionWorkThis article presents an experience of a participative approach preliminary to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat products companies. Although the norms provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. The study was developed in the beef slaughtering sector using two complementary methods: observation of the work in loco, in order to select the jobs that are primarily eligible for the rotation, and a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of the rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers did not accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. As evidence of the advantages of the rotation, the variability in the work (30%), learning and gain of experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%) stand out. As disadvantages, the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%) stand out. We conclude that the participatory approach preliminary to the changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation, indicating improvement of processes in compliance with legal requirements.Este artigo apresenta experiência de abordagem participativa preliminar à implantação da NR-36, que regula o trabalho em empresas produtoras de carne e derivados. Apesar de a normativa prever a participação do trabalhador nos processos de implantação de rodízio de postos, não esclarece como fazê-lo. O estudo foi desenvolvido no setor de abate de bovinos utilizando dois métodos complementares entre si: observações do trabalho in loco, para seleção dos postos prioritariamente elegíveis ao rodízio, e levantamento da percepção argumentada dos trabalhadores sobre o nível de aceitação de realização do rodízio nos postos selecionados. A princípio, 72% dos trabalhadores não aceitavam realizar o rodízio. Após inclusão e participação no processo de implantação, 86% dos trabalhadores da área suja e 64% da área limpa concordaram em realizar. Como evidências das vantagens em realizar rodízio, a variabilidade no trabalho (30%), aprendizado e ganho de experiência (40%), mudanças de movimentos (35%) e descanso físico (32%) se destacam. Como desvantagens, sobressaem o medo de acidentes (30%) e o medo da mudança e do desconhecido (25%). Concluímos que a abordagem participativa preliminar às mudanças de desenhos organizacionais contribui na compreensão e percepção dos trabalhadores sobre as vantagens e desvantagens do rodízio, indicando melhoria dos processos no cumprimento das exigências legais. SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2021-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/216810.1590/SciELOPreprints.2168porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2168/3612Copyright (c) 2021 Iracimara de Anchieta Messias, Adelaide Nascimento, Raoni Rochahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMessias, Iracimara de AnchietaNascimento, Adelaide Rocha, Raonireponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2021-04-25T18:53:17Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/2168Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2021-04-25T18:53:17SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
Rodízio de postos de trabalho como exigência legal: análise da aceitação e percepção de trabalhadores do abate de bovinos
title Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
spellingShingle Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
Messias, Iracimara de Anchieta
Participação
Rotação
Matadouro
Percepção
Trabalho
Participation
Rotation
Slaughterhouse
Perception
Work
title_short Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
title_full Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
title_fullStr Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
title_full_unstemmed Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
title_sort Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the acceptance and perception of bovin slaughter workers
author Messias, Iracimara de Anchieta
author_facet Messias, Iracimara de Anchieta
Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
author_role author
author2 Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Messias, Iracimara de Anchieta
Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participação
Rotação
Matadouro
Percepção
Trabalho
Participation
Rotation
Slaughterhouse
Perception
Work
topic Participação
Rotação
Matadouro
Percepção
Trabalho
Participation
Rotation
Slaughterhouse
Perception
Work
description This article presents an experience of a participative approach preliminary to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat products companies. Although the norms provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. The study was developed in the beef slaughtering sector using two complementary methods: observation of the work in loco, in order to select the jobs that are primarily eligible for the rotation, and a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of the rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers did not accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. As evidence of the advantages of the rotation, the variability in the work (30%), learning and gain of experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%) stand out. As disadvantages, the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%) stand out. We conclude that the participatory approach preliminary to the changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation, indicating improvement of processes in compliance with legal requirements.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2168
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2168
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/2168
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/2168/3612
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Iracimara de Anchieta Messias, Adelaide Nascimento, Raoni Rocha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Iracimara de Anchieta Messias, Adelaide Nascimento, Raoni Rocha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047822740094976