Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Nascimento, Adelaide, Rocha, Raoni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440
Resumo: This article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements.
id UNSP_487dc3dd90b36453b391dee6f298dd2b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246440
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plantJob rotationLabor standardParticipationSlaughterhouseWorker's healthThis article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Ergonomia - NEPErg, SPConservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAMUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto Departamento de Engenharia de Produção Administração e Economia, MGUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Ergonomia - NEPErg, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAMUniversidade Federal de Ouro Pretode Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]Nascimento, AdelaideRocha, Raoni2023-07-29T12:40:59Z2023-07-29T12:40:59Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522Gestao e Producao, v. 29.1806-96490104-530Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24644010.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E105222-s2.0-85143605904Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGestao e Producaoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:40:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:10:09.662383Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
title Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
spellingShingle Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]
Job rotation
Labor standard
Participation
Slaughterhouse
Worker's health
title_short Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
title_full Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
title_fullStr Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
title_full_unstemmed Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
title_sort Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
author de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]
author_facet de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]
Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
author_role author
author2 Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAM
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]
Nascimento, Adelaide
Rocha, Raoni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Job rotation
Labor standard
Participation
Slaughterhouse
Worker's health
topic Job rotation
Labor standard
Participation
Slaughterhouse
Worker's health
description This article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-07-29T12:40:59Z
2023-07-29T12:40:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522
Gestao e Producao, v. 29.
1806-9649
0104-530X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440
10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522
2-s2.0-85143605904
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440
identifier_str_mv Gestao e Producao, v. 29.
1806-9649
0104-530X
10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522
2-s2.0-85143605904
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Gestao e Producao
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128218285211648