Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440 |
Resumo: | This article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements. |
id |
UNSP_487dc3dd90b36453b391dee6f298dd2b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246440 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plantJob rotationLabor standardParticipationSlaughterhouseWorker's healthThis article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Ergonomia - NEPErg, SPConservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAMUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto Departamento de Engenharia de Produção Administração e Economia, MGUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Ergonomia - NEPErg, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAMUniversidade Federal de Ouro Pretode Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP]Nascimento, AdelaideRocha, Raoni2023-07-29T12:40:59Z2023-07-29T12:40:59Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522Gestao e Producao, v. 29.1806-96490104-530Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24644010.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E105222-s2.0-85143605904Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGestao e Producaoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T12:40:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/246440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:10:09.662383Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
title |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
spellingShingle |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP] Job rotation Labor standard Participation Slaughterhouse Worker's health |
title_short |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
title_full |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
title_fullStr |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
title_sort |
Job rotation as a legal requirement: analysis of the participatory approach in acceptance and workers' perception at a meatpacking plant |
author |
de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP] |
author_facet |
de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP] Nascimento, Adelaide Rocha, Raoni |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nascimento, Adelaide Rocha, Raoni |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers - CNAM Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Anchieta Messias, Iracimara [UNESP] Nascimento, Adelaide Rocha, Raoni |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Job rotation Labor standard Participation Slaughterhouse Worker's health |
topic |
Job rotation Labor standard Participation Slaughterhouse Worker's health |
description |
This article presents an experience of a participative approach prior to the implementation of NR-36, which regulates work in meat and meat byproduct companies. Although the regulations provide for worker participation in the processes of implementing job rotation, they do not explain how to do it. This study was developed in 2017 in the livestock slaughtering sector of a company with 79 workers, using two complementary methods: systematic and analytical observation of the real work (totaling 32 hours of observation) in order to select the jobs that were primarily eligible for rotation, together with a survey of the workers' perception of the level of acceptance of rotation in the selected jobs. At first, 72% of the workers refused to accept the rotation. After inclusion and participation in the implementation process, 86% of the workers in the dirty area and 64% in the clean area agreed to the rotation. The advantages of rotation that most stood out included: the variability in work (30%), learning and gaining experience (40%), changes in movements (35%), and physical rest (32%). By contrast, the disadvantages included: the fear of accidents (30%) and the fear of change and of the unknown (25%). It can therefore be concluded that the participatory approach prior to changes in organizational design contributes to the understanding and perception of workers about the advantages and disadvantages of the rotation process, indicating improvements that comply with legal requirements. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 2023-07-29T12:40:59Z 2023-07-29T12:40:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522 Gestao e Producao, v. 29. 1806-9649 0104-530X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440 10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522 2-s2.0-85143605904 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246440 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gestao e Producao, v. 29. 1806-9649 0104-530X 10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E10522 2-s2.0-85143605904 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Gestao e Producao |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128218285211648 |