ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5052 |
Resumo: | This article presents a theoretical work whose objective is the discussion of methodologies and methods in educational research, in particular those that analyze classroom discursive interactions. The first part discusses the two main research paradigms and their ontological and epistemological bases: positivism and interpretivism. Next, two methods for analyzing discursive interactions are presented and discussed, one for each paradigm. Systematic coding - within the quantitative context - is indicated to treat data from large samples, to describe general patterns and, by transforming the discourse into variables, to statistical comparisons or temporal analyses. The method is applied in a set of 42 episodes of group dialogue and the results are discussed in light of the nature of the research questions, showing what types of statistical tests can be performed. Within the interpretivist paradigm, sociocultural discourse analysis is presented as an example of qualitative method an it is applied to excerpts from classroom dialogues. The main finding is the identification of typologies that describe the ways in which teacher and students construct scientific explanations. In the final part, some possibilities and limits of each method are discussed and the conclusion defendes that both are complementary for the advancement of knowledge in the educational field. |
id |
SCI-1_b4f552ebeaf2b7b7544f72c89a567804 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/5052 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES SOBRE METODOLOGÍA Y MÉTODOS PARA EL ANÁLISIS DE LA INTERACCIÓN DISCURSIVA EN EL AULA: UNA DISCUSIÓN ENTRE LOS ENFOQUES CUANTITATIVO Y CUALITATIVOSOBRE METODOLOGIA E MÉTODOS PARA ANÁLISE DA INTERAÇÃO DISCURSIVA EM SALA DE AULA: UMA DISCUSSÃO ENTRE ABORDAGENS QUANTITATIVA E QUALITATIVAdiscursive interactionsMethodologyresearch paradigmssystematic codingsociocultural discourse analysisinterações discursivasmetodologiaparadigmas de pesquisacodificação sistemáticaanálise do discurso socioculturalinteracciones discursivasmetodologíaparadigmas de investigacióncodificación sistemáticaanálisis del discurso socioculturalThis article presents a theoretical work whose objective is the discussion of methodologies and methods in educational research, in particular those that analyze classroom discursive interactions. The first part discusses the two main research paradigms and their ontological and epistemological bases: positivism and interpretivism. Next, two methods for analyzing discursive interactions are presented and discussed, one for each paradigm. Systematic coding - within the quantitative context - is indicated to treat data from large samples, to describe general patterns and, by transforming the discourse into variables, to statistical comparisons or temporal analyses. The method is applied in a set of 42 episodes of group dialogue and the results are discussed in light of the nature of the research questions, showing what types of statistical tests can be performed. Within the interpretivist paradigm, sociocultural discourse analysis is presented as an example of qualitative method an it is applied to excerpts from classroom dialogues. The main finding is the identification of typologies that describe the ways in which teacher and students construct scientific explanations. In the final part, some possibilities and limits of each method are discussed and the conclusion defendes that both are complementary for the advancement of knowledge in the educational field.Este artículo presenta un trabajo teórico cuyo objetivo es la discusión de metodologías y métodos para la investigación educativa, en particular aquellos que analizan las interacciones discursivas que ocurren en el aula. La primera parte discute los dos principales paradigmas de investigación y sus bases ontológicas y epistemológicas: el positivismo y el interpretativismo. A continuación, se presentan y discuten dos métodos para analizar interacciones discursivas, uno para cada paradigma. La codificación sistemática -dentro del contexto cuantitativo- está indicada para tratar datos de grandes muestras, describir patrones generales y, al transformar el discurso en variables, puede utilizarse para comparaciones estadísticas entre grupos o análisis temporales. El método se aplica a un conjunto de 42 episodios de diálogo grupal y los resultados se discuten a la luz de la naturaleza de las preguntas de investigación, mostrando qué tipos de pruebas estadísticas se pueden realizar. Dentro del paradigma interpretativo, el análisis del discurso sociocultural se presenta como un ejemplo de método cualitativo. El método se aplica a extractos de diálogos de aula en los que el resultado es la identificación de tipologías que describen las formas en que el profesor y los estudiantes construyen explicaciones científicas. En la parte final del trabajo se discuten las posibilidades y límites de cada método y en la conclusión se defiende la tesis de que ambos son complementarios para el avance del conocimiento en el campo educativo.Esse artigo apresenta um trabalho teórico cujo objetivo é a discussão de metodologias e métodos para a pesquisa educacional, em particular aquelas que analisam as interações discursivas que ocorrem em sala de aula. A primeira parte discorre sobre os dois principais paradigmas de pesquisa e suas bases ontológicas e epistemológicas: o positivismo e o interpretivismo. A seguir, dois métodos para análise das interações discursivas são apresentados e discutidos, um para cada paradigma. A codificação sistemática - dentro do contexto quantitativo - é indicada para tratar dados provenientes de grandes amostras, para a descrição de padrões gerais e, ao transformar o discurso em variáveis, poder ser utilizada para comparações estatísticas entre grupos ou análises temporais. O método é aplicado em um conjunto de 42 episódios de diálogo em grupo e os resultados discutidos à luz da natureza das perguntas de pesquisa, mostrando-se quais tipos de testes estatísticos podem ser realizados. Dentro do paradigma interpretivista, apresenta-se a análise do discurso sociocultural para exemplo de método qualitativo. O método é aplicado a trechos de diálogos de sala de aula em que o resultado é a identificação de tipologias que descrevem as formas em que professor e alunos constroem explicações científicas. Na parte final do trabalho, as possibilidades e limites de cada método são discutidas e na conclusão se defende a tese de que ambos são complementares para o avanço do conhecimento no campo educacional.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2022-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/505210.1590/SciELOPreprints.5052enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/5052/9834Copyright (c) 2022 Leonardo Goncalves Lagohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLago, Leonardo Goncalvesreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2022-11-11T01:33:35Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/5052Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2022-11-11T01:33:35SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES SOBRE METODOLOGÍA Y MÉTODOS PARA EL ANÁLISIS DE LA INTERACCIÓN DISCURSIVA EN EL AULA: UNA DISCUSIÓN ENTRE LOS ENFOQUES CUANTITATIVO Y CUALITATIVO SOBRE METODOLOGIA E MÉTODOS PARA ANÁLISE DA INTERAÇÃO DISCURSIVA EM SALA DE AULA: UMA DISCUSSÃO ENTRE ABORDAGENS QUANTITATIVA E QUALITATIVA |
title |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
spellingShingle |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES Lago, Leonardo Goncalves discursive interactions Methodology research paradigms systematic coding sociocultural discourse analysis interações discursivas metodologia paradigmas de pesquisa codificação sistemática análise do discurso sociocultural interacciones discursivas metodología paradigmas de investigación codificación sistemática análisis del discurso sociocultural |
title_short |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
title_full |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
title_fullStr |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
title_full_unstemmed |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
title_sort |
ON METHODOLOGY AND METHODS FOR ANALYSING CLASSROOM DISCURSIVE INTERACTION: A DISCUSSION BETWEEN QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES |
author |
Lago, Leonardo Goncalves |
author_facet |
Lago, Leonardo Goncalves |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lago, Leonardo Goncalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
discursive interactions Methodology research paradigms systematic coding sociocultural discourse analysis interações discursivas metodologia paradigmas de pesquisa codificação sistemática análise do discurso sociocultural interacciones discursivas metodología paradigmas de investigación codificación sistemática análisis del discurso sociocultural |
topic |
discursive interactions Methodology research paradigms systematic coding sociocultural discourse analysis interações discursivas metodologia paradigmas de pesquisa codificação sistemática análise do discurso sociocultural interacciones discursivas metodología paradigmas de investigación codificación sistemática análisis del discurso sociocultural |
description |
This article presents a theoretical work whose objective is the discussion of methodologies and methods in educational research, in particular those that analyze classroom discursive interactions. The first part discusses the two main research paradigms and their ontological and epistemological bases: positivism and interpretivism. Next, two methods for analyzing discursive interactions are presented and discussed, one for each paradigm. Systematic coding - within the quantitative context - is indicated to treat data from large samples, to describe general patterns and, by transforming the discourse into variables, to statistical comparisons or temporal analyses. The method is applied in a set of 42 episodes of group dialogue and the results are discussed in light of the nature of the research questions, showing what types of statistical tests can be performed. Within the interpretivist paradigm, sociocultural discourse analysis is presented as an example of qualitative method an it is applied to excerpts from classroom dialogues. The main finding is the identification of typologies that describe the ways in which teacher and students construct scientific explanations. In the final part, some possibilities and limits of each method are discussed and the conclusion defendes that both are complementary for the advancement of knowledge in the educational field. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5052 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.5052 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/5052 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.5052 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/5052/9834 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Leonardo Goncalves Lago https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Leonardo Goncalves Lago https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:SciELO instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
SciELO |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - SciELO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047830526820352 |