Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | preprint |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | SciELO Preprints |
Texto Completo: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/7623 |
Resumo: | Biodiversity research is essential for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, necessitating diverse participation and perspectives. However, the field currently faces a significant inclusivity problem as local expertise from biodiversity-rich but economically disadvantaged regions is often underrepresented. The underrepresentation of local experts is driven by four main challenges: linguistic bias, undervalued contributions, parachute science practices, and capacity constraints. While fragmented solutions exist, a unified multi-stakeholder approach is necessary to address these interconnected and systemic issues. Here, we introduce a holistic framework of collective responsibility, integrating tailored strategies that embrace diversity and dismantle systemic barriers for equitable collaboration. This framework delineates the diverse actors and practices required for promoting inclusivity in biodiversity research, assigning clear responsibilities to researchers, publishers, institutions, and funding bodies. Strategies for researchers include cultivating self-awareness, expanding literature searches, fostering partnerships with local experts, and promoting knowledge exchange. For institutions, we recommend establishing specialized liaison roles, implementing equitable policies, allocating resources for diversity initiatives, and enhancing support for international researchers. Publishers can facilitate multilingual dissemination, remove financial barriers, establish inclusivity standards, and ensure equitable representation in peer review. Funders should remove systemic barriers, strengthen research networks, and prioritize equitable resource allocation. Implementing these stakeholder-specific strategies can help dismantle deep-rooted biases and structural inequities in biodiversity research, catalyzing a shift towards a more inclusive and representative model that amplifies diverse perspectives and maximizes collective knowledge for effective global conservation. |
id |
SCI-1_c088f3ca4b3dcec51b685590ea4b5a21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/7623 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective ImpactPromovendo a Pesquisa Inclusiva em Biodiversidade: Estratégias para Práticas Equitativas e Impacto Coletivobiodiversidadeinclusividadeinclusãorepresentaçãociência paracaídasconservaçãodiversidadeconhecimento tradicionalequidadecolaboraçãoSul globalbiodiversityinclusivityinclusionrepresentationparachute scienceconservationdiversitytraditional knowledgeequitycollaborationglobal southBiodiversity research is essential for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, necessitating diverse participation and perspectives. However, the field currently faces a significant inclusivity problem as local expertise from biodiversity-rich but economically disadvantaged regions is often underrepresented. The underrepresentation of local experts is driven by four main challenges: linguistic bias, undervalued contributions, parachute science practices, and capacity constraints. While fragmented solutions exist, a unified multi-stakeholder approach is necessary to address these interconnected and systemic issues. Here, we introduce a holistic framework of collective responsibility, integrating tailored strategies that embrace diversity and dismantle systemic barriers for equitable collaboration. This framework delineates the diverse actors and practices required for promoting inclusivity in biodiversity research, assigning clear responsibilities to researchers, publishers, institutions, and funding bodies. Strategies for researchers include cultivating self-awareness, expanding literature searches, fostering partnerships with local experts, and promoting knowledge exchange. For institutions, we recommend establishing specialized liaison roles, implementing equitable policies, allocating resources for diversity initiatives, and enhancing support for international researchers. Publishers can facilitate multilingual dissemination, remove financial barriers, establish inclusivity standards, and ensure equitable representation in peer review. Funders should remove systemic barriers, strengthen research networks, and prioritize equitable resource allocation. Implementing these stakeholder-specific strategies can help dismantle deep-rooted biases and structural inequities in biodiversity research, catalyzing a shift towards a more inclusive and representative model that amplifies diverse perspectives and maximizes collective knowledge for effective global conservation.A pesquisa em biodiversidade é essencial para enfrentar a crise global de biodiversidade, exigindo perspectivas diversificadas. No entanto, este campo do conhecimento enfrenta um significativo problema de inclusão, uma vez que os conhecimentos ecológicos produzidos em áreas ricas em biodiversidade, mas economicamente desfavorecidas, são frequentemente sub-representados. Esta sub-representação é impulsionada por quatro desafios principais: viés linguístico, contribuições científicas subvalorizadas, colaborações baseadas em práticas colonialistas (parachute science) e lacunas na capacitação e no acesso a dados. Embora soluções fragmentadas existam, uma abordagem multilateral unificada é necessária para abordar estas questões sistêmicas. Aqui, introduzimos uma abordagem holística de responsabilidade coletiva, integrando estratégias personalizadas que abraçam a diversidade e desmantelam barreiras sistêmicas para uma colaboração equitativa. Esta abordagem delineia os diversos atores e práticas necessárias para promover a inclusão na pesquisa sobre biodiversidade, atribuindo responsabilidades claras a pesquisadores, editoras, instituições e órgãos de fomento. As estratégias para os investigadores incluem o cultivo da autoconsciência, a expansão das pesquisas bibliográficas, o fomento de parcerias com especialistas locais e a promoção do intercâmbio de conhecimentos. Para as instituições, recomendamos o estabelecimento de funções de intermediação especializadas, a implementação de políticas equitativas, a alocação de recursos para iniciativas de diversidade e o reforço do apoio a pesquisadores internacionais. As editoras podem facilitar a divulgação multilíngue, eliminar barreiras financeiras, estabelecer normas de inclusão e assegurar uma representação equitativa na avaliação pelos pares. Os financiadores devem eliminar barreiras sistêmicas, fortalecer redes de pesquisa e dar prioridade à distribuição equitativa de recursos. A implementação dessas estratégias específicas para as partes interessadas pode ajudar a desmantelar vieses profundamente enraizados e desigualdades estruturais na pesquisa de biodiversidade, catalisando uma mudança para um modelo mais inclusivo e representativo que amplifica perspectivas diversas e maximiza o conhecimento coletivo para uma eficaz conservação da biodiversidade global.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2024-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/762310.1590/SciELOPreprints.7623porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/7623/15786Copyright (c) 2023 Jose Valdez, Gabriella Damasceno, Rachel R.Y. Oh, Laura Catalina Quintero Uribe, Martha Paola Barajas Barbosa, Talita Ferreira Amado, Chloé Schmidt, Miguel Fernandez, Sandeep Sharmahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValdez, JoseDamasceno, GabriellaOh, Rachel R.Y.Uribe, Laura Catalina QuinteroBarbosa, Martha Paola BarajasAmado, Talita FerreiraSchmidt, ChloéFernandez, MiguelSharma, Sandeepreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2023-12-05T16:43:10Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/7623Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2023-12-05T16:43:10SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact Promovendo a Pesquisa Inclusiva em Biodiversidade: Estratégias para Práticas Equitativas e Impacto Coletivo |
title |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
spellingShingle |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact Valdez, Jose biodiversidade inclusividade inclusão representação ciência paracaídas conservação diversidade conhecimento tradicional equidade colaboração Sul global biodiversity inclusivity inclusion representation parachute science conservation diversity traditional knowledge equity collaboration global south |
title_short |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
title_full |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
title_fullStr |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
title_full_unstemmed |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
title_sort |
Advancing Inclusive Biodiversity Research: Strategies for Equitable Practices and Collective Impact |
author |
Valdez, Jose |
author_facet |
Valdez, Jose Damasceno, Gabriella Oh, Rachel R.Y. Uribe, Laura Catalina Quintero Barbosa, Martha Paola Barajas Amado, Talita Ferreira Schmidt, Chloé Fernandez, Miguel Sharma, Sandeep |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Damasceno, Gabriella Oh, Rachel R.Y. Uribe, Laura Catalina Quintero Barbosa, Martha Paola Barajas Amado, Talita Ferreira Schmidt, Chloé Fernandez, Miguel Sharma, Sandeep |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valdez, Jose Damasceno, Gabriella Oh, Rachel R.Y. Uribe, Laura Catalina Quintero Barbosa, Martha Paola Barajas Amado, Talita Ferreira Schmidt, Chloé Fernandez, Miguel Sharma, Sandeep |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biodiversidade inclusividade inclusão representação ciência paracaídas conservação diversidade conhecimento tradicional equidade colaboração Sul global biodiversity inclusivity inclusion representation parachute science conservation diversity traditional knowledge equity collaboration global south |
topic |
biodiversidade inclusividade inclusão representação ciência paracaídas conservação diversidade conhecimento tradicional equidade colaboração Sul global biodiversity inclusivity inclusion representation parachute science conservation diversity traditional knowledge equity collaboration global south |
description |
Biodiversity research is essential for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, necessitating diverse participation and perspectives. However, the field currently faces a significant inclusivity problem as local expertise from biodiversity-rich but economically disadvantaged regions is often underrepresented. The underrepresentation of local experts is driven by four main challenges: linguistic bias, undervalued contributions, parachute science practices, and capacity constraints. While fragmented solutions exist, a unified multi-stakeholder approach is necessary to address these interconnected and systemic issues. Here, we introduce a holistic framework of collective responsibility, integrating tailored strategies that embrace diversity and dismantle systemic barriers for equitable collaboration. This framework delineates the diverse actors and practices required for promoting inclusivity in biodiversity research, assigning clear responsibilities to researchers, publishers, institutions, and funding bodies. Strategies for researchers include cultivating self-awareness, expanding literature searches, fostering partnerships with local experts, and promoting knowledge exchange. For institutions, we recommend establishing specialized liaison roles, implementing equitable policies, allocating resources for diversity initiatives, and enhancing support for international researchers. Publishers can facilitate multilingual dissemination, remove financial barriers, establish inclusivity standards, and ensure equitable representation in peer review. Funders should remove systemic barriers, strengthen research networks, and prioritize equitable resource allocation. Implementing these stakeholder-specific strategies can help dismantle deep-rooted biases and structural inequities in biodiversity research, catalyzing a shift towards a more inclusive and representative model that amplifies diverse perspectives and maximizes collective knowledge for effective global conservation. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/7623 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7623 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/7623 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.7623 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/7623/15786 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1797047814265503744 |