Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fortaleza, Carlos Magno
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: preprint
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: SciELO Preprints
Texto Completo: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/162
Resumo: The response to the current COVID-19 pandemics require reflections on the validity of scientific knowledge. While non-pharmacological measures for disease control are providing a worldwide natural experiment, it is highly advised to submit research findings to the scrutinity of renowed epistemologic theories. One should also consider the loosening of methodological criticism in time when diffusion of results is urgently required. Though criticism is perhaps most precious principle of scientific thinking and practice, scientists must find a way into relative consensus that can be translated into public health policies.
id SCI-1_d48b8d01b2db2a0882cd8a4b4b9cbc76
oai_identifier_str oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/162
network_acronym_str SCI-1
network_name_str SciELO Preprints
repository_id_str
spelling Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemicsCOVID-19EpidemiologyEpistemologyPhilosophy of ScienceThe response to the current COVID-19 pandemics require reflections on the validity of scientific knowledge. While non-pharmacological measures for disease control are providing a worldwide natural experiment, it is highly advised to submit research findings to the scrutinity of renowed epistemologic theories. One should also consider the loosening of methodological criticism in time when diffusion of results is urgently required. Though criticism is perhaps most precious principle of scientific thinking and practice, scientists must find a way into relative consensus that can be translated into public health policies.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2020-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/16210.1590/SciELOPreprints.162enghttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/162/192Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Magno Fortalezahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFortaleza, Carlos Magnoreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:SciELOinstacron:SCI2020-04-23T23:39:07Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/162Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2020-04-23T23:39:07SciELO Preprints - SciELOfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
title Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
spellingShingle Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
Fortaleza, Carlos Magno
COVID-19
Epidemiology
Epistemology
Philosophy of Science
title_short Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
title_full Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
title_fullStr Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
title_full_unstemmed Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
title_sort Emergency science: epistemological insights on the response to COVID-19 pandemics
author Fortaleza, Carlos Magno
author_facet Fortaleza, Carlos Magno
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fortaleza, Carlos Magno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Epidemiology
Epistemology
Philosophy of Science
topic COVID-19
Epidemiology
Epistemology
Philosophy of Science
description The response to the current COVID-19 pandemics require reflections on the validity of scientific knowledge. While non-pharmacological measures for disease control are providing a worldwide natural experiment, it is highly advised to submit research findings to the scrutinity of renowed epistemologic theories. One should also consider the loosening of methodological criticism in time when diffusion of results is urgently required. Though criticism is perhaps most precious principle of scientific thinking and practice, scientists must find a way into relative consensus that can be translated into public health policies.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format preprint
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/162
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.162
url https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/162
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.162
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/article/view/162/192
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Magno Fortaleza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Magno Fortaleza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
SciELO Preprints
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SciELO Preprints
instname:SciELO
instacron:SCI
instname_str SciELO
instacron_str SCI
institution SCI
reponame_str SciELO Preprints
collection SciELO Preprints
repository.name.fl_str_mv SciELO Preprints - SciELO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scielo.submission@scielo.org
_version_ 1797047816658354176

Registros relacionados