Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Taquette, Stella Regina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)
DOI: 10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.511
Texto Completo: https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/511
Resumo: The ethical norms that regulate scientific research in Brazil were developed in a biomedical logic, inadequate for research in the human sciences and/or of a qualitative nature. Despite the advances achieved with the revisions made in resolution 466/12 that gave rise to the complementary resolution 510/16 about the standards applicable to research in Human and Social Sciences, it is still possible to notice inappropriate requirements for qualitative investigations in Plataforma Brasil and also in the evaluation process carried out by Research Ethics Committees (RECs). This article aims to describe some ethical obstacles and conflicts that may arise in this process and contribute to the improvement of the ethical review of qualitative research. A step-by-step analysis of the submission of projects in Plataforma Brasil was carried out, as well as a bibliographic review of studies that focus on ethical conflicts related to the evaluation of projects by RECs. Keywords: Qualitative research; Ethics Committees, Research; Informed Consent; Sampling Studies.
id SE&PQ-1_56a5c04b20be2395430e8bae7172f8a6
oai_identifier_str oai:editora.sepq.org.br:article/511
network_acronym_str SE&PQ-1
network_name_str Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)
spelling Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative researchInadequações do sistema CONEP às pesquisas qualitativasThe ethical norms that regulate scientific research in Brazil were developed in a biomedical logic, inadequate for research in the human sciences and/or of a qualitative nature. Despite the advances achieved with the revisions made in resolution 466/12 that gave rise to the complementary resolution 510/16 about the standards applicable to research in Human and Social Sciences, it is still possible to notice inappropriate requirements for qualitative investigations in Plataforma Brasil and also in the evaluation process carried out by Research Ethics Committees (RECs). This article aims to describe some ethical obstacles and conflicts that may arise in this process and contribute to the improvement of the ethical review of qualitative research. A step-by-step analysis of the submission of projects in Plataforma Brasil was carried out, as well as a bibliographic review of studies that focus on ethical conflicts related to the evaluation of projects by RECs. Keywords: Qualitative research; Ethics Committees, Research; Informed Consent; Sampling Studies.As normas éticas que regulam as pesquisas científicas no Brasil foram desenvolvidas na lógica biomédica, inadequada para pesquisas das ciências humanas e/ou de natureza qualitativa. Apesar dos avanços conquistados com as revisões feitas na resolução 466/12 que deram origem à resolução complementar 510/16 sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciêncais Humanas e Sociais, ainda pode-se perceber exigências impróprias às investigações de cunho qualitativo na Plataforma Brasil e também no processo de avaliação realizado pelos integrantes dos Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa (CEPs). O presente artigo tem por objetivo descrever alguns obstáculos e conflitos éticos que podem surgir nesse processo e contribuir para o aperfeiçoamento da avaliação ética de pesquisas qualitativas. Foi realizada análise do passo a passo da submissão de projetos na Plataforma Brasil e revisão bibliográfica de estudos que enfocam conflitos éticos relacionados à apreciação de projetos pelos CEPs. Palavras-chave: Pesquisa Qualitativa; Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa; Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido; Amostragem.Sociedade de Estudos e Pesquisas Qualitativos - SE&PQ2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/51110.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.511Qualitative Research Journal ; Vol. 9 No. 22 (2021): Prática em Pesquisa Qualitativa no Brasil: Enfoques Filosóficos, Metodológicos e Técnicos; 593-608Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa; v. 9 n. 22 (2021): Prática em Pesquisa Qualitativa no Brasil: Enfoques Filosóficos, Metodológicos e Técnicos; 593-6082525-82221809-025710.33361/RPQ.v.9.n.22reponame:Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos e Pesquisa Qualitativos (SE&PQ)instacron:SE&PQporhttps://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/511/295Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Pesquisa Qualitativahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTaquette, Stella Regina 2022-01-23T04:29:58Zoai:editora.sepq.org.br:article/511Revistahttps://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/indexONGhttps://editora.sepq.org.br/index.php/rpq/oai||revista.rpq@gmail.com2525-82221809-0257opendoar:2022-01-23T04:29:58Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos e Pesquisa Qualitativos (SE&PQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
Inadequações do sistema CONEP às pesquisas qualitativas
title Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
spellingShingle Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
Taquette, Stella Regina
Taquette, Stella Regina
title_short Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
title_full Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
title_fullStr Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
title_sort Inadequacy of the CONEP system for qualitative research
author Taquette, Stella Regina
author_facet Taquette, Stella Regina
Taquette, Stella Regina
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taquette, Stella Regina
description The ethical norms that regulate scientific research in Brazil were developed in a biomedical logic, inadequate for research in the human sciences and/or of a qualitative nature. Despite the advances achieved with the revisions made in resolution 466/12 that gave rise to the complementary resolution 510/16 about the standards applicable to research in Human and Social Sciences, it is still possible to notice inappropriate requirements for qualitative investigations in Plataforma Brasil and also in the evaluation process carried out by Research Ethics Committees (RECs). This article aims to describe some ethical obstacles and conflicts that may arise in this process and contribute to the improvement of the ethical review of qualitative research. A step-by-step analysis of the submission of projects in Plataforma Brasil was carried out, as well as a bibliographic review of studies that focus on ethical conflicts related to the evaluation of projects by RECs. Keywords: Qualitative research; Ethics Committees, Research; Informed Consent; Sampling Studies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/511
10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.511
url https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/511
identifier_str_mv 10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.511
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://editora.sepq.org.br/rpq/article/view/511/295
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Estudos e Pesquisas Qualitativos - SE&PQ
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Estudos e Pesquisas Qualitativos - SE&PQ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Qualitative Research Journal ; Vol. 9 No. 22 (2021): Prática em Pesquisa Qualitativa no Brasil: Enfoques Filosóficos, Metodológicos e Técnicos; 593-608
Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa; v. 9 n. 22 (2021): Prática em Pesquisa Qualitativa no Brasil: Enfoques Filosóficos, Metodológicos e Técnicos; 593-608
2525-8222
1809-0257
10.33361/RPQ.v.9.n.22
reponame:Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos e Pesquisa Qualitativos (SE&PQ)
instacron:SE&PQ
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos e Pesquisa Qualitativos (SE&PQ)
instacron_str SE&PQ
institution SE&PQ
reponame_str Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)
collection Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Pesquisa Qualitativa (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Estudos e Pesquisa Qualitativos (SE&PQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.rpq@gmail.com
_version_ 1822180561427365888
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.33361/RPQ.2021.v.9.n.22.511

Registros relacionados