EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1996 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605 |
Resumo: | A Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used for diagnosis of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) typeS 01, A24, C3 which occured in Rio Grande do Sul State, Southern Brazil during 1984-1993. The samples were randomly selected and tested by. Elisa, Complement Fixation Test (CFT) and in tissue ctilture. Out of 106 samples 78 (73:5%) were positive by Elisa and 39(36.8 %) were found positive in CFT, when original suspensions were used. Once_those samples were inoculated onto tissue culture both tests gave similar results, although Elisa picked tip more positive samples during the lst passage in tissue culture. The negative samples (16) included in this study were negative in all tests. The Elisa was more sensitive than and as speci fie as CFT. Elisa and tissue culture together were shown to be a better system for detection of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) antigen than CFT. |
id |
SEAPDR_54ed6844a259a1e8bf932339a467a67c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/605 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS AVALIAÇÃO DE UM TESTE DE ELISA INDIRETO PARA DETECTAR E TIPIFICAR VIRUS DA FEBRE AFTOSA Foot and mouth disease.Indirect Elisa.Complement fixation.Tissue culture.Febre aftosa.Elisa indireto.Fixação de complemento.Cultura de tecidos.A Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used for diagnosis of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) typeS 01, A24, C3 which occured in Rio Grande do Sul State, Southern Brazil during 1984-1993. The samples were randomly selected and tested by. Elisa, Complement Fixation Test (CFT) and in tissue ctilture. Out of 106 samples 78 (73:5%) were positive by Elisa and 39(36.8 %) were found positive in CFT, when original suspensions were used. Once_those samples were inoculated onto tissue culture both tests gave similar results, although Elisa picked tip more positive samples during the lst passage in tissue culture. The negative samples (16) included in this study were negative in all tests. The Elisa was more sensitive than and as speci fie as CFT. Elisa and tissue culture together were shown to be a better system for detection of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) antigen than CFT.Um kit de elisa indireto foi usado para diagnosticar o virus da febre aftosa para os tipos 01, A24, C3 incidentes no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul no período 1984 - 1993. As amostras foram selecionadas ao acaso e testadas por elisa, fixação do complemento(FC) e em cultura de tecido.De um total de 106 amostras de suspensões originais, 78(73,5%) foram positivas em elisa e 39(36,8%) foram positivas por fixação do complemento. Quando estas amostras foram inoculadas em culturas de células, ambos os testes tiveram idêntica performance, embora o teste de elisa tenha sido capaz de detectar mais amostras positivas que o teste de fixação de complemento durante a l' passagem em cultura de tecido. Todas as amostras negativas(16) incluídas no experimento se mostraram negativas em todos os testes e durante toda a investigação. O teste de elisa foi mais sensível que FC; elisa e FC tiveram a mesma especificidade. Elisa e cultura de tecidos se mostraram o melhor sistema paradetectar o antígeno de febre aftosa que o teste de FC. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural1996-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 2 No 1 (1996): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 107-109Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 2 n. 1 (1996): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 107-1092595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRporhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605/556PIRES PRADO, JOSÉ ANTONIO FREITAS TEIXEIRA, JOÃO CARLOS RECKZIEGEL, PAULO ESTANISLÁO PETZHOLD, SYLIO ALFREDO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-22T12:01:36Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/605Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2024-04-22T12:01:36Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS AVALIAÇÃO DE UM TESTE DE ELISA INDIRETO PARA DETECTAR E TIPIFICAR VIRUS DA FEBRE AFTOSA |
title |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
spellingShingle |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS PIRES PRADO, JOSÉ ANTONIO Foot and mouth disease. Indirect Elisa. Complement fixation. Tissue culture. Febre aftosa. Elisa indireto. Fixação de complemento. Cultura de tecidos. |
title_short |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
title_full |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
title_sort |
EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR DETECTION AND TYPING OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE VIRUS |
author |
PIRES PRADO, JOSÉ ANTONIO |
author_facet |
PIRES PRADO, JOSÉ ANTONIO FREITAS TEIXEIRA, JOÃO CARLOS RECKZIEGEL, PAULO ESTANISLÁO PETZHOLD, SYLIO ALFREDO |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
FREITAS TEIXEIRA, JOÃO CARLOS RECKZIEGEL, PAULO ESTANISLÁO PETZHOLD, SYLIO ALFREDO |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PIRES PRADO, JOSÉ ANTONIO FREITAS TEIXEIRA, JOÃO CARLOS RECKZIEGEL, PAULO ESTANISLÁO PETZHOLD, SYLIO ALFREDO |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Foot and mouth disease. Indirect Elisa. Complement fixation. Tissue culture. Febre aftosa. Elisa indireto. Fixação de complemento. Cultura de tecidos. |
topic |
Foot and mouth disease. Indirect Elisa. Complement fixation. Tissue culture. Febre aftosa. Elisa indireto. Fixação de complemento. Cultura de tecidos. |
description |
A Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used for diagnosis of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) typeS 01, A24, C3 which occured in Rio Grande do Sul State, Southern Brazil during 1984-1993. The samples were randomly selected and tested by. Elisa, Complement Fixation Test (CFT) and in tissue ctilture. Out of 106 samples 78 (73:5%) were positive by Elisa and 39(36.8 %) were found positive in CFT, when original suspensions were used. Once_those samples were inoculated onto tissue culture both tests gave similar results, although Elisa picked tip more positive samples during the lst passage in tissue culture. The negative samples (16) included in this study were negative in all tests. The Elisa was more sensitive than and as speci fie as CFT. Elisa and tissue culture together were shown to be a better system for detection of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) antigen than CFT. |
publishDate |
1996 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1996-01-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/605/556 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 2 No 1 (1996): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 107-109 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 2 n. 1 (1996): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 107-109 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068775982366720 |