Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142 |
Resumo: | The lack of quality commercial substrate for seedling production and short supply of different rootstocks citrus leave the Rio Grande do Sul State vulnerable. The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of two commercial substrates on the emergency and development of different citrus roottstocks during sowing in the greenhouse. The experiment was carried out in styrofoam trays, testing the substrate: Commercial 1 (Carolina Soil®) and Commercial 2 (Beifiur®) in styrofoan trays were tested. The rootstocks tested were ‘Sunki' (Citrus sunki hort. ex Tan.), 'Flying Dragon' (Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa), citrumelo ‘Swingle’ [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. paradisi Macf.], 'Trifoliate’ [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.)], 'Volkamer' lemon (C. volkameriana Ten & Pasq.) and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37' [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck.]. We evaluated physical and chemical characteristics of substrates, emergence (%), height (cm), stem diameter (mm) of the seedlings. The Commercial 2 substrate showed high levels of soluble salts and initial density. The Commercial 1 substrate allowed an anticipation in plant emergence of Poncirus trifoliata, ‘Volkamer’ lemon and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37’, but by the end plant emergence was similar among substrates, reaching high percentages for all of them. Both substrates, if handled properly, provide satisfactory citrus rootstock seedling development. |
id |
SEAPDR_6e5bee84d3e7a63680ddf3ffec894da0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/142 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substratesDesenvolvimento de porta-enxertos cítricos em dois substratos comerciais em fase de sementeiraCitrus. Strength. Greenhouse. Propagation.Citros. Vigor. Ambiente protegido. Propagação.The lack of quality commercial substrate for seedling production and short supply of different rootstocks citrus leave the Rio Grande do Sul State vulnerable. The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of two commercial substrates on the emergency and development of different citrus roottstocks during sowing in the greenhouse. The experiment was carried out in styrofoam trays, testing the substrate: Commercial 1 (Carolina Soil®) and Commercial 2 (Beifiur®) in styrofoan trays were tested. The rootstocks tested were ‘Sunki' (Citrus sunki hort. ex Tan.), 'Flying Dragon' (Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa), citrumelo ‘Swingle’ [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. paradisi Macf.], 'Trifoliate’ [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.)], 'Volkamer' lemon (C. volkameriana Ten & Pasq.) and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37' [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck.]. We evaluated physical and chemical characteristics of substrates, emergence (%), height (cm), stem diameter (mm) of the seedlings. The Commercial 2 substrate showed high levels of soluble salts and initial density. The Commercial 1 substrate allowed an anticipation in plant emergence of Poncirus trifoliata, ‘Volkamer’ lemon and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37’, but by the end plant emergence was similar among substrates, reaching high percentages for all of them. Both substrates, if handled properly, provide satisfactory citrus rootstock seedling development. A carência de substratos comerciais de qualidade para produção de mudas e a pouca diversificação de porta-enxertos deixam a citricultura rio-grandense vulnerável. Objetivou-se avaliar a eficiência de dois substratos comerciais sobre a emergência e o desenvolvimento de diferentes porta- enxertos cítricos na fase de sementeira, em ambiente protegido. O experimento foi realizado em bandejas alveoladas, testando-se o substrato Comercial 1 (Carolina Soil®) e o Comercial 2 (Beifiur®). Testaram-se os seguintes porta-enxertos: tangerineira ‘Sunki’ (Citrus sunki hort. ex Tan.), ‘Flying Dragon’ (Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa), citrumeleiro ‘Swingle’ [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. paradisi Macf.], ‘Trifoliata’ [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.], limoeiro ‘Volkameriano’ (C. volkameriana Ten & Pasq.) e o citrangeiro ‘Fepagro C 37’ [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck.]. Avaliaram-se as características físicas e químicas dos substratos, a emergência (%), a altura (cm) e o diâmetro do caule (mm) das plântulas. O substrato Comercial 2 apresentou elevado teor inicial de sais solúveis e densidade. O Comercial 1 permitiu antecipação da emergência no ‘Trifoliata’, no limoeiro ‘Volkameriano’ e no citrangeiro ‘Fepagro C37’, porém, ao final, a emergência foi semelhante entre os substratos atingindo percentuais elevados para todos. Ambos substratos, se manejados adequadamente, proporcionam desenvolvimento satisfatório aos porta-enxertos cítricos. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural2013-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 18 No 2 (2012): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 167-175Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 18 n. 2 (2012): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 167-1752595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRporhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142/116Rieth, Sandra Giuliani, Julio Cesar Soares, Wagner Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-22T12:18:13Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/142Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2024-04-22T12:18:13Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates Desenvolvimento de porta-enxertos cítricos em dois substratos comerciais em fase de sementeira |
title |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
spellingShingle |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates Rieth, Sandra Citrus. Strength. Greenhouse. Propagation. Citros. Vigor. Ambiente protegido. Propagação. |
title_short |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
title_full |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
title_fullStr |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
title_sort |
Development of varieties of citrus rootstocks seedlings grown in two commercial substrates |
author |
Rieth, Sandra |
author_facet |
Rieth, Sandra Giuliani, Julio Cesar Soares, Wagner Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Giuliani, Julio Cesar Soares, Wagner Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rieth, Sandra Giuliani, Julio Cesar Soares, Wagner Souza, Paulo Vitor Dutra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Citrus. Strength. Greenhouse. Propagation. Citros. Vigor. Ambiente protegido. Propagação. |
topic |
Citrus. Strength. Greenhouse. Propagation. Citros. Vigor. Ambiente protegido. Propagação. |
description |
The lack of quality commercial substrate for seedling production and short supply of different rootstocks citrus leave the Rio Grande do Sul State vulnerable. The objective was to evaluate the efficiency of two commercial substrates on the emergency and development of different citrus roottstocks during sowing in the greenhouse. The experiment was carried out in styrofoam trays, testing the substrate: Commercial 1 (Carolina Soil®) and Commercial 2 (Beifiur®) in styrofoan trays were tested. The rootstocks tested were ‘Sunki' (Citrus sunki hort. ex Tan.), 'Flying Dragon' (Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa), citrumelo ‘Swingle’ [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. paradisi Macf.], 'Trifoliate’ [Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.)], 'Volkamer' lemon (C. volkameriana Ten & Pasq.) and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37' [P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. x C. sinensis (L.) Osbeck.]. We evaluated physical and chemical characteristics of substrates, emergence (%), height (cm), stem diameter (mm) of the seedlings. The Commercial 2 substrate showed high levels of soluble salts and initial density. The Commercial 1 substrate allowed an anticipation in plant emergence of Poncirus trifoliata, ‘Volkamer’ lemon and citrange ‘Fepagro C 37’, but by the end plant emergence was similar among substrates, reaching high percentages for all of them. Both substrates, if handled properly, provide satisfactory citrus rootstock seedling development. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/142/116 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 18 No 2 (2012): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 167-175 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 18 n. 2 (2012): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 167-175 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068771687399424 |