EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2002 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324 |
Resumo: | To evaluate the effect of soil tillage systems and crop rotation on com yield an experiment was set up in Passo Fundo, RS, .13razi1, which was monitored over a four-year period. Fiou soil tillage systems — I) no-tillage. during winter and summer seasons, 2) conventional tillage using disk plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, 3) conventional tillage using moldboard plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, and 4) mini muni tillage, in winter and no-til lage, in summer. — and two crop rotation systems ¡system 1 (wheat/soybean and common vetch/corn) and system II (wheat/soybean, black oats or white oats/soybean, and common vetch/corn)] were compared. An experimental design of blocks at random, with split-plots and three replications, was used. The main plot was formed by soi I tillage systems, while the split-plots consisted of crop rotation systems. The yield of com grown tender to-tillage and minimum tillage was higher than the yield obtained for com grown after conventional tillage using disk or moldboard plow and disk harrow. There were no significant &Tem of crop rotation systems on com yields. |
id |
SEAPDR_c67f15564946cef00de68169c9542f91 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/324 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD EFEITO DE SISTEMAS DE MANEJO DE SOLO E DE ROTAÇÃO DE CULTURAS SOBRE O RENDIMENTO DE GRÃOS DE MILHO conventional tillage, minimum tillage, no-tillage. Zea mayst-preparo convencional de solo, cultivo mínimo, plantio direto, Zea mays L.To evaluate the effect of soil tillage systems and crop rotation on com yield an experiment was set up in Passo Fundo, RS, .13razi1, which was monitored over a four-year period. Fiou soil tillage systems — I) no-tillage. during winter and summer seasons, 2) conventional tillage using disk plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, 3) conventional tillage using moldboard plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, and 4) mini muni tillage, in winter and no-til lage, in summer. — and two crop rotation systems ¡system 1 (wheat/soybean and common vetch/corn) and system II (wheat/soybean, black oats or white oats/soybean, and common vetch/corn)] were compared. An experimental design of blocks at random, with split-plots and three replications, was used. The main plot was formed by soi I tillage systems, while the split-plots consisted of crop rotation systems. The yield of com grown tender to-tillage and minimum tillage was higher than the yield obtained for com grown after conventional tillage using disk or moldboard plow and disk harrow. There were no significant &Tem of crop rotation systems on com yields. Para avaliar o efeito do manejo de solo e de rotação de culturas sobre o rendimento de grãos de milho, acompanhou-se durante quatro anos experimento instalado em Passo Fundo, RS. Neste, foram comparados quatro siste- mas de manejo de solo — 1) plantio direto, no inverno e no verão, 2) preparo convencional de solo com arado de discos + grade de discos, no inverno e semeadura direta, no verão, 3) preparo convencional de solo com arado de aivecas + grade de discos, no inverno e semeadura direta, no verão e 4) cultivo Mínimo com escarificador. no inverno e semeadura direta. no verão — e dois sistemas de rotação de culturas: sistema I (trigo/soja e ervi haca/mi lho) e sistema II (trigo/soja, aveia preta ou aveia branca/soja e ervi lhaca/mi lho). O delineamento experimental foi em blocos ao acaso, com parcelas subdivi- didas e três repetições. A parcela principal foi constituída pelos sistemas de manejo de solo, e as subparcelas, pelos sistemas de rotação de culturas. O rendimento de grãos de milho cultivado no plantio direto e no cultivo mínimo foi superior ao milho cultivado nos preparo convencional de solo com arado de discos e com arado de aivecas. Não foram observadas diferenças significativas no rendimento de grãos de milho em decorrência da rotação de culturas. Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural2002-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 8 No 1/2 (2002): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 93-101Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 8 n. 1/2 (2002): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 93-1012595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRporhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324/288SANTOS, HENRIQUE PEREIRALHAMBY, JULIO CESAR BARRENECHE info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-22T12:27:30Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/324Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2024-04-22T12:27:30Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD EFEITO DE SISTEMAS DE MANEJO DE SOLO E DE ROTAÇÃO DE CULTURAS SOBRE O RENDIMENTO DE GRÃOS DE MILHO |
title |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
spellingShingle |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD SANTOS, HENRIQUE PEREIRA conventional tillage, minimum tillage, no-tillage. Zea mayst- preparo convencional de solo, cultivo mínimo, plantio direto, Zea mays L. |
title_short |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
title_full |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
title_fullStr |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
title_sort |
EFFECT OF SOILTILLAGE SYSTEMS AND CROPROTATION ON CORN YIELD |
author |
SANTOS, HENRIQUE PEREIRA |
author_facet |
SANTOS, HENRIQUE PEREIRA LHAMBY, JULIO CESAR BARRENECHE |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LHAMBY, JULIO CESAR BARRENECHE |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SANTOS, HENRIQUE PEREIRA LHAMBY, JULIO CESAR BARRENECHE |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
conventional tillage, minimum tillage, no-tillage. Zea mayst- preparo convencional de solo, cultivo mínimo, plantio direto, Zea mays L. |
topic |
conventional tillage, minimum tillage, no-tillage. Zea mayst- preparo convencional de solo, cultivo mínimo, plantio direto, Zea mays L. |
description |
To evaluate the effect of soil tillage systems and crop rotation on com yield an experiment was set up in Passo Fundo, RS, .13razi1, which was monitored over a four-year period. Fiou soil tillage systems — I) no-tillage. during winter and summer seasons, 2) conventional tillage using disk plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, 3) conventional tillage using moldboard plow and disk harrow, in winter and no-tillage, in summer, and 4) mini muni tillage, in winter and no-til lage, in summer. — and two crop rotation systems ¡system 1 (wheat/soybean and common vetch/corn) and system II (wheat/soybean, black oats or white oats/soybean, and common vetch/corn)] were compared. An experimental design of blocks at random, with split-plots and three replications, was used. The main plot was formed by soi I tillage systems, while the split-plots consisted of crop rotation systems. The yield of com grown tender to-tillage and minimum tillage was higher than the yield obtained for com grown after conventional tillage using disk or moldboard plow and disk harrow. There were no significant &Tem of crop rotation systems on com yields. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/324/288 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 8 No 1/2 (2002): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 93-101 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 8 n. 1/2 (2002): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 93-101 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068772631117824 |