Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Rosa, Patricia Pinto
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Ávila, Bianca Pio, Scheibler, Rudolf Brand, Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr, Sauthier, Janaína, Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique, Schafhauser Junior, Jorge, Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762
Resumo: The objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers.
id SEAPDR_d7d076a9fd7eb6cdd121dddd9349e98a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/762
network_acronym_str SEAPDR
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliationProdutividade e valor nutritivo do capim elefante BRS Kurumi sujeito a diferentes proporções de desfolhamentoTropical forageForage productionTilleringForrageira tropicalProdução de forragemPerfilhamentoThe objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers.O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a produtividade, o valor nutricional da forragem e o perfilhamento do capim elefante cv. BRS Kurumi sob diferentes alturas de dossel pré e pós-desfolha (resíduo). Os tratamentos foram distribuídos em delineamento experimental de blocos completos ao acaso, com duas alturas de dossel pré-desfolha (60 e 80 cm) e três alturas de resíduo pós-desfolha (10, 25 e 40 cm), com quatro repetições, combinados em arranjo fatorial 2 x 3, sendo, respectivamente, de 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; e 80 x 40 cm. Foram avaliadas as características produtivas, bromatológicas, fracionamento de carboidratos e degradabilidade in situ. Os resultados indicaram que se o objetivo for buscar curtos intervalos entre pastejos, associados a maior qualidade de forragem, os manejos 60 x 25, 60 x 40 e 80 x 40 são os mais indicados. Para máxima produtividade de forragem, 80 x 10 e 80 x 25 são os mais aconselhados. Para perfilhamento, manejos com altura de dossel de 80 cm são preferenciais, destacando-se 80 x 25 para perfilhos aéreos e 80 x 40 para perfilhos basais.Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural2023-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/76210.36812/pag.202329116-31Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 29 No 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 16-31Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 16-312595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRenghttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762/636Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúchahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Rosa, Patricia Pinto Ávila, Bianca PioScheibler, Rudolf Brand Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr Sauthier, JanaínaScheffler, Guilherme Henrique Schafhauser Junior, JorgeFerreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz 2023-05-11T18:59:53Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/762Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2023-05-11T18:59:53Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
Produtividade e valor nutritivo do capim elefante BRS Kurumi sujeito a diferentes proporções de desfolhamento
title Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
spellingShingle Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
da Rosa, Patricia Pinto
Tropical forage
Forage production
Tillering
Forrageira tropical
Produção de forragem
Perfilhamento
title_short Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
title_full Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
title_fullStr Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
title_full_unstemmed Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
title_sort Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
author da Rosa, Patricia Pinto
author_facet da Rosa, Patricia Pinto
Ávila, Bianca Pio
Scheibler, Rudolf Brand
Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr
Sauthier, Janaína
Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique
Schafhauser Junior, Jorge
Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz
author_role author
author2 Ávila, Bianca Pio
Scheibler, Rudolf Brand
Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr
Sauthier, Janaína
Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique
Schafhauser Junior, Jorge
Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Rosa, Patricia Pinto
Ávila, Bianca Pio
Scheibler, Rudolf Brand
Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr
Sauthier, Janaína
Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique
Schafhauser Junior, Jorge
Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tropical forage
Forage production
Tillering
Forrageira tropical
Produção de forragem
Perfilhamento
topic Tropical forage
Forage production
Tillering
Forrageira tropical
Produção de forragem
Perfilhamento
description The objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762
10.36812/pag.202329116-31
url http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762
identifier_str_mv 10.36812/pag.202329116-31
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762/636
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 29 No 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 16-31
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 16-31
2595-7686
0104-9070
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron:SEAPDR
instname_str Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
instacron_str SEAPDR
institution SEAPDR
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||
_version_ 1797068775999143936