Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762 |
Resumo: | The objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers. |
id |
SEAPDR_d7d076a9fd7eb6cdd121dddd9349e98a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/762 |
network_acronym_str |
SEAPDR |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliationProdutividade e valor nutritivo do capim elefante BRS Kurumi sujeito a diferentes proporções de desfolhamentoTropical forageForage productionTilleringForrageira tropicalProdução de forragemPerfilhamentoThe objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers.O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a produtividade, o valor nutricional da forragem e o perfilhamento do capim elefante cv. BRS Kurumi sob diferentes alturas de dossel pré e pós-desfolha (resíduo). Os tratamentos foram distribuídos em delineamento experimental de blocos completos ao acaso, com duas alturas de dossel pré-desfolha (60 e 80 cm) e três alturas de resíduo pós-desfolha (10, 25 e 40 cm), com quatro repetições, combinados em arranjo fatorial 2 x 3, sendo, respectivamente, de 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; e 80 x 40 cm. Foram avaliadas as características produtivas, bromatológicas, fracionamento de carboidratos e degradabilidade in situ. Os resultados indicaram que se o objetivo for buscar curtos intervalos entre pastejos, associados a maior qualidade de forragem, os manejos 60 x 25, 60 x 40 e 80 x 40 são os mais indicados. Para máxima produtividade de forragem, 80 x 10 e 80 x 25 são os mais aconselhados. Para perfilhamento, manejos com altura de dossel de 80 cm são preferenciais, destacando-se 80 x 25 para perfilhos aéreos e 80 x 40 para perfilhos basais.Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural2023-03-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/76210.36812/pag.202329116-31Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 29 No 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 16-31Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 16-312595-76860104-9070reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online)instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulinstacron:SEAPDRenghttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762/636Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúchahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Rosa, Patricia Pinto Ávila, Bianca PioScheibler, Rudolf Brand Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr Sauthier, JanaínaScheffler, Guilherme Henrique Schafhauser Junior, JorgeFerreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz 2023-05-11T18:59:53Zoai:ojs.revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br:article/762Revistahttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapagPUBhttp://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/oaipag@agricultura.rs.gov.br||2595-76860104-9070opendoar:2023-05-11T18:59:53Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sulfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation Produtividade e valor nutritivo do capim elefante BRS Kurumi sujeito a diferentes proporções de desfolhamento |
title |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
spellingShingle |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation da Rosa, Patricia Pinto Tropical forage Forage production Tillering Forrageira tropical Produção de forragem Perfilhamento |
title_short |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
title_full |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
title_fullStr |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
title_sort |
Productivity and nutritional value of elephant grass BRS Kurumi subjected to different proportions of defoliation |
author |
da Rosa, Patricia Pinto |
author_facet |
da Rosa, Patricia Pinto Ávila, Bianca Pio Scheibler, Rudolf Brand Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr Sauthier, Janaína Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique Schafhauser Junior, Jorge Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ávila, Bianca Pio Scheibler, Rudolf Brand Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr Sauthier, Janaína Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique Schafhauser Junior, Jorge Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Rosa, Patricia Pinto Ávila, Bianca Pio Scheibler, Rudolf Brand Kröning, Alexsandro Bahr Sauthier, Janaína Scheffler, Guilherme Henrique Schafhauser Junior, Jorge Ferreira, Otoniel Geter Lauz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tropical forage Forage production Tillering Forrageira tropical Produção de forragem Perfilhamento |
topic |
Tropical forage Forage production Tillering Forrageira tropical Produção de forragem Perfilhamento |
description |
The objective of this paper was to evaluate productivity, nutritional value of forage and tillering of elephant grass cv. BRS Kurumi under different pre-defoliation and post-defoliation canopy heights (residual height). The experimental design consisted in a randomized complete block design, with four replications. Treatments corresponded to the factorial combination of two pre‐defoliation heights (60 and 80 cm) and three post-defoliation residue heights (10, 25 and 40 cm), combined in factorial design 2 x 3, being, respectively, 60 x 10 cm; 60 x 25 cm; 60 x 40 cm; 80 x 10 cm; 80 x 25 cm; 80 x 40 cm. Productive, bromatological, carbohydrate fractionation and in situ degradability characteristics were evaluated. Results indicated that if the objective is to seek short intervals between grazing, associated with higher forage quality, the 60 x 25, 60 x 40 and 80 x 40 managements are the most indicated ones. For maximum forage productivity, 80 x 10 and 80 x 25 are the most recommended ones. For tillering, a canopy height management of 80 cm is preferred, with 80 x 25 for aerial tillers and 80 x 40 for basal tillers. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762 10.36812/pag.202329116-31 |
url |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36812/pag.202329116-31 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistapag.agricultura.rs.gov.br/ojs/index.php/revistapag/article/view/762/636 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa Agropecuária. Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; Vol 29 No 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAUCHA; 16-31 Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha; v. 29 n. 1 (2023): PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA; 16-31 2595-7686 0104-9070 reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) instname:Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul instacron:SEAPDR |
instname_str |
Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
instacron_str |
SEAPDR |
institution |
SEAPDR |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha (Online) - Secretaria de Agricultura, Pecuária e Desenvolvimento Rural do Rio Grande do Sul |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pag@agricultura.rs.gov.br|| |
_version_ |
1797068775999143936 |