Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Shahraki,Gh
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Hafidzi,MN, Khadri,MS, Rafinejad,J, Ibrahim,YB
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Neotropical entomology (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-566X2011000500013
Resumo: This study assessed the cost and effectiveness of an integrated pest management (IPM) program using hydramethylnon gel baits compared with conventional spraying for controlling the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in two residential buildings in Yasuj, Iran. The IPM approach was based on educational programs using pamphlets, posters and lectures, sanitation using vacuuming and application of hydramethylnon gel baits. Conventional approach used cypermethrin (10% EC) on baseboard and cracks-and-crevices. Sticky traps were used as tools for monitoring cockroach population densities. The IPM approach reduced (943%) the rate of insecticide application compared to the conventional spray. Cockroach populations in the IPM treatment were significantly reduced from an average of 12.2 ± 3.01 cockroaches per unit before treatment to zero cockroach per unit by week four and thereafter. Cockroach populations in the conventional spray treatment were reduced from an average of 11.5 ± 4.43 cockroaches per unit before treatment to an average of 3.4 ± 0.99 cockroach per unit after 11 weeks of post treatment. The IPM treatment improved 100% of infested units compared to 78% for spray treatment to obtain a clean level of infestation (< 1cockroach per trap per unit). The results suggest that the intervention by IPM using hydramethylnon gel baits significantly reduced cockroach infestation compared to cypermethrin spray throughout the 11 weeks of post-treatment period. However, within the study period, the IPM system involving gel baits, educational program and sanitation was 363.2% more expensive than the conventional method.
id SEB-2_6306138ccd87785059af5ca955927932
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-566X2011000500013
network_acronym_str SEB-2
network_name_str Neotropical entomology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildingsBlattella germanicacost comparisonhydramethylnonIPMThis study assessed the cost and effectiveness of an integrated pest management (IPM) program using hydramethylnon gel baits compared with conventional spraying for controlling the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in two residential buildings in Yasuj, Iran. The IPM approach was based on educational programs using pamphlets, posters and lectures, sanitation using vacuuming and application of hydramethylnon gel baits. Conventional approach used cypermethrin (10% EC) on baseboard and cracks-and-crevices. Sticky traps were used as tools for monitoring cockroach population densities. The IPM approach reduced (943%) the rate of insecticide application compared to the conventional spray. Cockroach populations in the IPM treatment were significantly reduced from an average of 12.2 ± 3.01 cockroaches per unit before treatment to zero cockroach per unit by week four and thereafter. Cockroach populations in the conventional spray treatment were reduced from an average of 11.5 ± 4.43 cockroaches per unit before treatment to an average of 3.4 ± 0.99 cockroach per unit after 11 weeks of post treatment. The IPM treatment improved 100% of infested units compared to 78% for spray treatment to obtain a clean level of infestation (< 1cockroach per trap per unit). The results suggest that the intervention by IPM using hydramethylnon gel baits significantly reduced cockroach infestation compared to cypermethrin spray throughout the 11 weeks of post-treatment period. However, within the study period, the IPM system involving gel baits, educational program and sanitation was 363.2% more expensive than the conventional method.Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil2011-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-566X2011000500013Neotropical Entomology v.40 n.5 2011reponame:Neotropical entomology (Online)instname:Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil (SEB)instacron:SEB10.1590/S1519-566X2011000500013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessShahraki,GhHafidzi,MNKhadri,MSRafinejad,JIbrahim,YBeng2011-11-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-566X2011000500013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/neONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editor@seb.org.br1678-80521519-566Xopendoar:2011-11-07T00:00Neotropical entomology (Online) - Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil (SEB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
title Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
spellingShingle Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
Shahraki,Gh
Blattella germanica
cost comparison
hydramethylnon
IPM
title_short Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
title_full Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
title_sort Cost-effectiveness of integrated pest management compared with insecticidal spraying against the German cockroach in apartment buildings
author Shahraki,Gh
author_facet Shahraki,Gh
Hafidzi,MN
Khadri,MS
Rafinejad,J
Ibrahim,YB
author_role author
author2 Hafidzi,MN
Khadri,MS
Rafinejad,J
Ibrahim,YB
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Shahraki,Gh
Hafidzi,MN
Khadri,MS
Rafinejad,J
Ibrahim,YB
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blattella germanica
cost comparison
hydramethylnon
IPM
topic Blattella germanica
cost comparison
hydramethylnon
IPM
description This study assessed the cost and effectiveness of an integrated pest management (IPM) program using hydramethylnon gel baits compared with conventional spraying for controlling the German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in two residential buildings in Yasuj, Iran. The IPM approach was based on educational programs using pamphlets, posters and lectures, sanitation using vacuuming and application of hydramethylnon gel baits. Conventional approach used cypermethrin (10% EC) on baseboard and cracks-and-crevices. Sticky traps were used as tools for monitoring cockroach population densities. The IPM approach reduced (943%) the rate of insecticide application compared to the conventional spray. Cockroach populations in the IPM treatment were significantly reduced from an average of 12.2 ± 3.01 cockroaches per unit before treatment to zero cockroach per unit by week four and thereafter. Cockroach populations in the conventional spray treatment were reduced from an average of 11.5 ± 4.43 cockroaches per unit before treatment to an average of 3.4 ± 0.99 cockroach per unit after 11 weeks of post treatment. The IPM treatment improved 100% of infested units compared to 78% for spray treatment to obtain a clean level of infestation (< 1cockroach per trap per unit). The results suggest that the intervention by IPM using hydramethylnon gel baits significantly reduced cockroach infestation compared to cypermethrin spray throughout the 11 weeks of post-treatment period. However, within the study period, the IPM system involving gel baits, educational program and sanitation was 363.2% more expensive than the conventional method.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-566X2011000500013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-566X2011000500013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1519-566X2011000500013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Neotropical Entomology v.40 n.5 2011
reponame:Neotropical entomology (Online)
instname:Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil (SEB)
instacron:SEB
instname_str Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil (SEB)
instacron_str SEB
institution SEB
reponame_str Neotropical entomology (Online)
collection Neotropical entomology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Neotropical entomology (Online) - Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil (SEB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editor@seb.org.br
_version_ 1754820849847762944