Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132010000100018 |
Resumo: | The nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) from leaves of Drosera (Droseraceae) were amplified using "universal" primers. The analysis of the products demonstrated most samples were a molecular mixture as a result of unsuccessful and non-specific amplifications. Among the obtained sequences, two were from Basidiomycota fungi. Homologous sequences of Basidiomycota were obtained from GenBank database and added to a data set with sequences from Drosera leaves. Parsimony analysis demonstrated that one sequence was amplified from an Ustilaginomycetes fungus, and another from a Heterobasidiomycetes. Possibly these fungi were associated to leaves of Drosera, and not because of samples contamination. In order to provide optimization and a better specificity of PCR (polymerase chain reaction), a very successful method was demonstrated using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) in reactions. |
id |
TECPAR-1_55a8896fb8aa32a204aa4bfd644c3526 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-89132010000100018 |
network_acronym_str |
TECPAR-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplificationpolymeraseDNADroserafungiphylogenyThe nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) from leaves of Drosera (Droseraceae) were amplified using "universal" primers. The analysis of the products demonstrated most samples were a molecular mixture as a result of unsuccessful and non-specific amplifications. Among the obtained sequences, two were from Basidiomycota fungi. Homologous sequences of Basidiomycota were obtained from GenBank database and added to a data set with sequences from Drosera leaves. Parsimony analysis demonstrated that one sequence was amplified from an Ustilaginomycetes fungus, and another from a Heterobasidiomycetes. Possibly these fungi were associated to leaves of Drosera, and not because of samples contamination. In order to provide optimization and a better specificity of PCR (polymerase chain reaction), a very successful method was demonstrated using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) in reactions.Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar2010-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132010000100018Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.53 n.1 2010reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)instacron:TECPAR10.1590/S1516-89132010000100018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda,Vitor Fernandes Oliveira deMartins,Vanderlei GeraldoFurlan,AntonioBacci Jr.,Maurícioeng2010-02-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-89132010000100018Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/babt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbabt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br1678-43241516-8913opendoar:2010-02-25T00:00Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
title |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
spellingShingle |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification Miranda,Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de polymerase DNA Drosera fungi phylogeny |
title_short |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
title_full |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
title_fullStr |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
title_full_unstemmed |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
title_sort |
Plant or fungal sequences? An alternative optimized PCR protocol to avoid ITS (nrDNA) misamplification |
author |
Miranda,Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de |
author_facet |
Miranda,Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de Martins,Vanderlei Geraldo Furlan,Antonio Bacci Jr.,Maurício |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins,Vanderlei Geraldo Furlan,Antonio Bacci Jr.,Maurício |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miranda,Vitor Fernandes Oliveira de Martins,Vanderlei Geraldo Furlan,Antonio Bacci Jr.,Maurício |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
polymerase DNA Drosera fungi phylogeny |
topic |
polymerase DNA Drosera fungi phylogeny |
description |
The nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) from leaves of Drosera (Droseraceae) were amplified using "universal" primers. The analysis of the products demonstrated most samples were a molecular mixture as a result of unsuccessful and non-specific amplifications. Among the obtained sequences, two were from Basidiomycota fungi. Homologous sequences of Basidiomycota were obtained from GenBank database and added to a data set with sequences from Drosera leaves. Parsimony analysis demonstrated that one sequence was amplified from an Ustilaginomycetes fungus, and another from a Heterobasidiomycetes. Possibly these fungi were associated to leaves of Drosera, and not because of samples contamination. In order to provide optimization and a better specificity of PCR (polymerase chain reaction), a very successful method was demonstrated using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) in reactions. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132010000100018 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132010000100018 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-89132010000100018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.53 n.1 2010 reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology instname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) instacron:TECPAR |
instname_str |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
instacron_str |
TECPAR |
institution |
TECPAR |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
collection |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
babt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br |
_version_ |
1750318273620082688 |