Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000400007 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effects of using genetically modified and organic soybean in two generations of rats. Two consecutive generations of 64 Wistar rats denominated F0 and F1 were used. The animals from each generation were divided into three groups (n=8) and fed chow made of organic soybean, genetically modified soybean and casein. The PER, NPR and CAE were determined. ANOVA was applied to the results. In both the generations, a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference was found between the experimental groups and the control group. The organic soybean supplement with L-cystine provided a better use of this protein in comparison to the genetically modified soybean protein, which demonstrated that the soybean maintained its protein use, although always inferior to casein. Thus, soybean should be used with caution during the growth stages because even with supplements, it remained inferior in relation to the casein group. |
id |
TECPAR-1_9916d3962c54dbe354939c001a3751bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-89132009000400007 |
network_acronym_str |
TECPAR-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar ratssoybeansWistar ratsprotein qualitygenerationsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effects of using genetically modified and organic soybean in two generations of rats. Two consecutive generations of 64 Wistar rats denominated F0 and F1 were used. The animals from each generation were divided into three groups (n=8) and fed chow made of organic soybean, genetically modified soybean and casein. The PER, NPR and CAE were determined. ANOVA was applied to the results. In both the generations, a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference was found between the experimental groups and the control group. The organic soybean supplement with L-cystine provided a better use of this protein in comparison to the genetically modified soybean protein, which demonstrated that the soybean maintained its protein use, although always inferior to casein. Thus, soybean should be used with caution during the growth stages because even with supplements, it remained inferior in relation to the casein group.Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000400007Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.52 n.4 2009reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)instacron:TECPAR10.1590/S1516-89132009000400007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDaleprane,Julio BeltramePacheco,Juliana TomazBoaventura,Gilson Teleseng2009-09-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-89132009000400007Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/babt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbabt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br1678-43241516-8913opendoar:2009-09-10T00:00Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
title |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats Daleprane,Julio Beltrame soybeans Wistar rats protein quality generations |
title_short |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
title_full |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
title_sort |
Evaluation of protein quality from genetically modified and organic soybean in two consecutives generations of wistar rats |
author |
Daleprane,Julio Beltrame |
author_facet |
Daleprane,Julio Beltrame Pacheco,Juliana Tomaz Boaventura,Gilson Teles |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pacheco,Juliana Tomaz Boaventura,Gilson Teles |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Daleprane,Julio Beltrame Pacheco,Juliana Tomaz Boaventura,Gilson Teles |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
soybeans Wistar rats protein quality generations |
topic |
soybeans Wistar rats protein quality generations |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative effects of using genetically modified and organic soybean in two generations of rats. Two consecutive generations of 64 Wistar rats denominated F0 and F1 were used. The animals from each generation were divided into three groups (n=8) and fed chow made of organic soybean, genetically modified soybean and casein. The PER, NPR and CAE were determined. ANOVA was applied to the results. In both the generations, a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference was found between the experimental groups and the control group. The organic soybean supplement with L-cystine provided a better use of this protein in comparison to the genetically modified soybean protein, which demonstrated that the soybean maintained its protein use, although always inferior to casein. Thus, soybean should be used with caution during the growth stages because even with supplements, it remained inferior in relation to the casein group. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000400007 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89132009000400007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-89132009000400007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.52 n.4 2009 reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology instname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) instacron:TECPAR |
instname_str |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
instacron_str |
TECPAR |
institution |
TECPAR |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
collection |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
babt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br |
_version_ |
1750318273131446272 |