Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Joshi,Vinod K
Data de Publicação: 1999
Outros Autores: Sharma,Sanjeev K, Goyal,Ravinder K, Thakur,Narayan S
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008
Resumo: Plum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine.
id TECPAR-1_ea6573ad37a26fd5e96179c018bc1065
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-89131999000300008
network_acronym_str TECPAR-1
network_name_str Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
repository_id_str
spelling Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum winePlumPrunus salicina L.Sparkling winepotassium metabisulphitesodium benzoateSaccharomyces cerevisiaePlum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine.Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar1999-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.42 n.3 1999reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)instacron:TECPAR10.1590/S1516-89131999000300008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJoshi,Vinod KSharma,Sanjeev KGoyal,Ravinder KThakur,Narayan Seng2011-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-89131999000300008Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/babt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbabt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br1678-43241516-8913opendoar:2011-06-01T00:00Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
title Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
spellingShingle Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
Joshi,Vinod K
Plum
Prunus salicina L.
Sparkling wine
potassium metabisulphite
sodium benzoate
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
title_short Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
title_full Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
title_fullStr Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
title_full_unstemmed Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
title_sort Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
author Joshi,Vinod K
author_facet Joshi,Vinod K
Sharma,Sanjeev K
Goyal,Ravinder K
Thakur,Narayan S
author_role author
author2 Sharma,Sanjeev K
Goyal,Ravinder K
Thakur,Narayan S
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Joshi,Vinod K
Sharma,Sanjeev K
Goyal,Ravinder K
Thakur,Narayan S
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Plum
Prunus salicina L.
Sparkling wine
potassium metabisulphite
sodium benzoate
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
topic Plum
Prunus salicina L.
Sparkling wine
potassium metabisulphite
sodium benzoate
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
description Plum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1516-89131999000300008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.42 n.3 1999
reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
instname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
instacron:TECPAR
instname_str Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
instacron_str TECPAR
institution TECPAR
reponame_str Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
collection Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv babt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br
_version_ 1750318268209430528