Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1999 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008 |
Resumo: | Plum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine. |
id |
TECPAR-1_ea6573ad37a26fd5e96179c018bc1065 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-89131999000300008 |
network_acronym_str |
TECPAR-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum winePlumPrunus salicina L.Sparkling winepotassium metabisulphitesodium benzoateSaccharomyces cerevisiaePlum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine.Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar1999-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.42 n.3 1999reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technologyinstname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)instacron:TECPAR10.1590/S1516-89131999000300008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJoshi,Vinod KSharma,Sanjeev KGoyal,Ravinder KThakur,Narayan Seng2011-06-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-89131999000300008Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/babt/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbabt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br1678-43241516-8913opendoar:2011-06-01T00:00Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
title |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
spellingShingle |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine Joshi,Vinod K Plum Prunus salicina L. Sparkling wine potassium metabisulphite sodium benzoate Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
title_short |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
title_full |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
title_fullStr |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
title_sort |
Effect of method of secondary fermentation and type of base wine on physico-chemical and sensory qualities of sparkling plum wine |
author |
Joshi,Vinod K |
author_facet |
Joshi,Vinod K Sharma,Sanjeev K Goyal,Ravinder K Thakur,Narayan S |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sharma,Sanjeev K Goyal,Ravinder K Thakur,Narayan S |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Joshi,Vinod K Sharma,Sanjeev K Goyal,Ravinder K Thakur,Narayan S |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Plum Prunus salicina L. Sparkling wine potassium metabisulphite sodium benzoate Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
topic |
Plum Prunus salicina L. Sparkling wine potassium metabisulphite sodium benzoate Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
description |
Plum base wines prepared with potassium metabisulphite or sodium benzoate were converted into sparkling wine, either by `Methode Champenoise' or tank method with artificially carbonated wine serving as a control. In both the secondary fermentation methods ethanol and low temperature acclimatized yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae UCD-595 with optimized sugar (1.5%) and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.2%) were used. Both methods of sparkling wine production and the type of base wine affected the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of the sparkling wine produced. In the secondary fermented wines, most of the physico-chemical characteristics were altered compared to that of artificially carbonated wines except volatile acidity, methanol, propanol and ethanol. Furthermore, these wines contained lower proteins, minerals and amyl alcohol than the base wine. In general, the sparkling wines produced by either of the secondary fermentation method had lower sugar, more alcohol, higher macro elements but lower Fe and Cu contents than the artificially carbonated wines. An overview of the changes occurring in the sparkling wine in comparison to artificially carbonated wine revealed that most of the changes took place due to secondary fermentation. The bottle fermented wine recorded the highest pressure, low TSS and sugars. The secondary bottle fermented wine was the best in most of the sensory qualities but needed proper acid-sugar blend of the base wine before conducting secondary fermentation. Sparkling wine made from base wine with sodium benzoate was preferred to that prepared with potassium metabisulphite. The studies showed the potential of plum fruits for production of sparkling wine. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-89131999000300008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-89131999000300008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology v.42 n.3 1999 reponame:Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology instname:Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) instacron:TECPAR |
instname_str |
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
instacron_str |
TECPAR |
institution |
TECPAR |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
collection |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology - Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná (Tecpar) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
babt@tecpar.br||babt@tecpar.br |
_version_ |
1750318268209430528 |