Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
Texto Completo: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1581
Resumo: Law nº 13.104/2015 – Femicide Law – is another Brazilian rule created in the midst of legislation that was born from the promise that Criminal Law would be a safe way to eradicate violence against women. However, seven years after its entry into force, it is noticeable that the novel qualifying homicide, even if it denounces the practice of misogyny in Brazil, has not been enough to curb the violent deaths of women in the context of domestic and family relationships, or in the field of the public sphere, where the perpetrators are men unknown to the victims or with whom they had little proximity. It is observed, therefore, that the regulation, by itself, cannot oppose the historical criminal legacy of patriarchy, namely: the physical elimination of women due to their sexual differentiation at birth. Thus, the academic study brings to critical reflection two historical facts of Modernity that boosted the formation of the inaugural Feminism - considering that the movement is recognized worldwide as an icon of the struggle for the end of violence against women: i) Femicide in mass (or gendercide) of white women in Western Europe (1487-1760), commonly known as the “Witch Hunt” and (ii) the denial of citizenship to women in the Republic by the French Revolution (1789- 1799). The importance of this historical retrospect is due to the fact that Feminisms, even with internal differences and still making symbolic use of punitive power, were responsible for forcing the State to create measures and services to protect women, saving thousands of them from male hatred. In this way, it is necessary to value the fact that the legislative novelty of 2015 removed the expression “crime of passion” from the Brazilian legal system, thus reaching the defense thesis, until then, used to reduce the responsibility of men accused of the practice of crime. misogynistic crime. However, the new legal text presents gaps regarding the faithful characterization of Feminicide, forcing delegates, prosecutors and judges to make efforts to identify the circumstances and conduct practiced in the execution act of the crime that denote having the woman was killed for “reasons of the female sex”. This is because not every intentional homicide committed against a woman is necessarily a femicide. In this perspective, the present academic study, of an empirical nature, analyzed the Complaints and Pronouncements of crimes against the lives of women committed in Recife between 2015 and 2020, in order to observe the arguments presented by the Public Ministry and by the judges that act in the four branches of the Jury Court of the capital to apply the qualifier. Among the main results of the study, the following stand out: i) the SJC has been slow to investigate, prosecute and prosecute the murders of women; ii) the feminicide qualifier is no longer applied even in cases where the accused were men with whom the victims had a family or affectionate relationship; iii) the procedural instruction phase is not used to identify elements that can help in the application of the qualifier; and iv) the racial profiling of victims is completely ignored. Such findings point to the need to train SJC agents. Finally, looking to the future, the present academic study encourages thinking about alternatives to face Femicide away from the punitive power, while making recommendations to the Policy to Combat Violence against Women in Pernambuco, aiming to avoid revictimization and prevent re-victimization. occurrence of the crime.
id UCAP_4b2c1ef3fcdf5ad058841f5db7ee5556
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/1581
network_acronym_str UCAP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
repository_id_str 4646
spelling Rosenblatt, Fernanda Cruz da FonsecaMelo, Marília Montenegro Pessoa deBuarque, Cristina Mariahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1527744039728502Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da2022-05-20T16:56:32Z2022-03-28SILVA, Fábia Lopes Gomes da. Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher? a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife. 2022. 158 f Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2022.http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1581Law nº 13.104/2015 – Femicide Law – is another Brazilian rule created in the midst of legislation that was born from the promise that Criminal Law would be a safe way to eradicate violence against women. However, seven years after its entry into force, it is noticeable that the novel qualifying homicide, even if it denounces the practice of misogyny in Brazil, has not been enough to curb the violent deaths of women in the context of domestic and family relationships, or in the field of the public sphere, where the perpetrators are men unknown to the victims or with whom they had little proximity. It is observed, therefore, that the regulation, by itself, cannot oppose the historical criminal legacy of patriarchy, namely: the physical elimination of women due to their sexual differentiation at birth. Thus, the academic study brings to critical reflection two historical facts of Modernity that boosted the formation of the inaugural Feminism - considering that the movement is recognized worldwide as an icon of the struggle for the end of violence against women: i) Femicide in mass (or gendercide) of white women in Western Europe (1487-1760), commonly known as the “Witch Hunt” and (ii) the denial of citizenship to women in the Republic by the French Revolution (1789- 1799). The importance of this historical retrospect is due to the fact that Feminisms, even with internal differences and still making symbolic use of punitive power, were responsible for forcing the State to create measures and services to protect women, saving thousands of them from male hatred. In this way, it is necessary to value the fact that the legislative novelty of 2015 removed the expression “crime of passion” from the Brazilian legal system, thus reaching the defense thesis, until then, used to reduce the responsibility of men accused of the practice of crime. misogynistic crime. However, the new legal text presents gaps regarding the faithful characterization of Feminicide, forcing delegates, prosecutors and judges to make efforts to identify the circumstances and conduct practiced in the execution act of the crime that denote having the woman was killed for “reasons of the female sex”. This is because not every intentional homicide committed against a woman is necessarily a femicide. In this perspective, the present academic study, of an empirical nature, analyzed the Complaints and Pronouncements of crimes against the lives of women committed in Recife between 2015 and 2020, in order to observe the arguments presented by the Public Ministry and by the judges that act in the four branches of the Jury Court of the capital to apply the qualifier. Among the main results of the study, the following stand out: i) the SJC has been slow to investigate, prosecute and prosecute the murders of women; ii) the feminicide qualifier is no longer applied even in cases where the accused were men with whom the victims had a family or affectionate relationship; iii) the procedural instruction phase is not used to identify elements that can help in the application of the qualifier; and iv) the racial profiling of victims is completely ignored. Such findings point to the need to train SJC agents. Finally, looking to the future, the present academic study encourages thinking about alternatives to face Femicide away from the punitive power, while making recommendations to the Policy to Combat Violence against Women in Pernambuco, aiming to avoid revictimization and prevent re-victimization. occurrence of the crime.A Lei nº 13.104/2015 – Lei do Feminicídio – é mais uma norma brasileira criada no bojo das legislações que nasceram da promessa de que o Direito Penal seria um caminho seguro para erradicar a violência contra as mulheres. Contudo, passados sete anos de sua entrada em vigor, é perceptível que a novel qualificadora do homicídio, mesmo que denuncie a prática da misoginia no Brasil, não tem sido suficiente para coibir as mortes violentas de mulheres no âmbito das relações domésticas e familiares, ou no campo da esfera pública, onde os autores são homens desconhecidos das vítimas ou com os quais tinham pouca proximidade. Observa-se, portanto, que a normativa, por si só, não consegue se contrapor ao histórico legado criminal do patriarcado, qual seja: a eliminação física das mulheres em razão de sua diferenciação sexual de nascença. Assim, o estudo acadêmico traz para reflexão crítica dois fatos históricos da Modernidade que impulsionaram a formação do Feminismo inaugural – tendo em vista que o movimento é reconhecido, mundialmente, como ícone de luta pelo fim da violência contra as mulheres: i) o Feminicídio em massa (ou generocídio) de mulheres brancas na Europa Ocidental (1487-1760), denominado vulgarmente de “Caça às Bruxas” e (ii) a negação às mulheres da condição de cidadãs na República, pela Revolução Francesa (1789-1799). A importância desse retrospecto histórico se deve ao fato de que os Feminismos, mesmo com divergências internas e ainda fazendo uso simbólico do poder punitivo, foi o responsável por obrigar o Estado a criar medidas e serviços de proteção às mulheres, salvando milhares delas do ódio masculino. Dessa forma, é preciso valorizar o fato de que a novidade legislativa de 2015 retirou a expressão “crime passional” do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, atingindo, assim, a tese de defesa, até então, utilizada para diminuir a responsabilização de homens acusados da prática do crime misógino. Mas, o novo texto legal apresenta lacunas quanto à fiel caracterização do Feminicídio, obrigando delegados(as), promotores(as) e juízes(as) a envidar esforços para identificar as circunstâncias e as condutas praticadas no ato executório do crime que denotam ter a mulher sido morta por “razões da condição de sexo feminino”. Isto porque nem todo homicídio doloso praticado contra uma mulher é necessariamente um Feminicídio. Nessa perspectiva, o presente estudo acadêmico, de caráter empírico, analisou as Denúncias e as Sentenças de Pronúncia de crimes contra a vida de mulheres cometidos no Recife entre os anos de 2015 e 2020, com o intuito de observar os argumentos apresentados pelo Ministério Público e pelos juízos que atuam nas quatro varas do Tribunal do Júri da capital para aplicar a qualificadora. Entre os principais resultados do estudo, destacam-se: i) há morosidade na atuação do SJC para investigar, processar e julgar os assassinatos de mulheres; ii) a qualificadora do Feminicídio deixou de ser aplicada mesmo em casos onde os acusados eram homens com os quais as vítimas tinham relação familiar ou de afeto; iii) a fase da instrução processual não é aproveitada para identificar elementos que possam ajudar na aplicação da qualificadora; e iv) o perfil racial das vítimas é completamente ignorado. Tais achados apontam para a necessidade de capacitação dos agentes do SJC. Por fim, olhando para o futuro, o presente estudo acadêmico estimula pensar alternativas para enfrentar o Feminicídio longe do poder punitivo, ao mesmo tempo em que faz recomendações à Política de Enfrentamento da Violência contra as Mulheres em Pernambuco, visando evitar a revitimização e prevenir a ocorrência do crime.Submitted by Biblioteca Central (biblioteca@unicap.br) on 2022-05-20T16:56:32Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Ok_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdf: 1154360 bytes, checksum: ce596b2836172df5046df1a9334d079a (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2022-05-20T16:56:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Ok_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdf: 1154360 bytes, checksum: ce596b2836172df5046df1a9334d079a (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-03-28application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em DireitoUNICAPBrasilDepartamento de Pós-Graduaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDissertaçõesCrime contra as mulheresMisoginiaFeminismoDissertationsCrime against womenMisogynyFeminismCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOFeminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-8801357989282212839500500600-8854052368273140835-7277407233034425144reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALOk_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdfOk_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdfapplication/pdf1154360http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/5/Ok_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdfce596b2836172df5046df1a9334d079aMD55CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82170http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/1/license.txt5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8MD51tede/15812022-05-20 13:56:32.283oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/1581Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462022-05-20T16:56:32Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
title Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
spellingShingle Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da
Dissertações
Crime contra as mulheres
Misoginia
Feminismo
Dissertations
Crime against women
Misogyny
Feminism
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
title_full Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
title_fullStr Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
title_full_unstemmed Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
title_sort Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher?: a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife.
author Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da
author_facet Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rosenblatt, Fernanda Cruz da Fonseca
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Melo, Marília Montenegro Pessoa de
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Buarque, Cristina Maria
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1527744039728502
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Fábia Lopes Gomes da
contributor_str_mv Rosenblatt, Fernanda Cruz da Fonseca
Melo, Marília Montenegro Pessoa de
Buarque, Cristina Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dissertações
Crime contra as mulheres
Misoginia
Feminismo
topic Dissertações
Crime contra as mulheres
Misoginia
Feminismo
Dissertations
Crime against women
Misogyny
Feminism
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Dissertations
Crime against women
Misogyny
Feminism
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description Law nº 13.104/2015 – Femicide Law – is another Brazilian rule created in the midst of legislation that was born from the promise that Criminal Law would be a safe way to eradicate violence against women. However, seven years after its entry into force, it is noticeable that the novel qualifying homicide, even if it denounces the practice of misogyny in Brazil, has not been enough to curb the violent deaths of women in the context of domestic and family relationships, or in the field of the public sphere, where the perpetrators are men unknown to the victims or with whom they had little proximity. It is observed, therefore, that the regulation, by itself, cannot oppose the historical criminal legacy of patriarchy, namely: the physical elimination of women due to their sexual differentiation at birth. Thus, the academic study brings to critical reflection two historical facts of Modernity that boosted the formation of the inaugural Feminism - considering that the movement is recognized worldwide as an icon of the struggle for the end of violence against women: i) Femicide in mass (or gendercide) of white women in Western Europe (1487-1760), commonly known as the “Witch Hunt” and (ii) the denial of citizenship to women in the Republic by the French Revolution (1789- 1799). The importance of this historical retrospect is due to the fact that Feminisms, even with internal differences and still making symbolic use of punitive power, were responsible for forcing the State to create measures and services to protect women, saving thousands of them from male hatred. In this way, it is necessary to value the fact that the legislative novelty of 2015 removed the expression “crime of passion” from the Brazilian legal system, thus reaching the defense thesis, until then, used to reduce the responsibility of men accused of the practice of crime. misogynistic crime. However, the new legal text presents gaps regarding the faithful characterization of Feminicide, forcing delegates, prosecutors and judges to make efforts to identify the circumstances and conduct practiced in the execution act of the crime that denote having the woman was killed for “reasons of the female sex”. This is because not every intentional homicide committed against a woman is necessarily a femicide. In this perspective, the present academic study, of an empirical nature, analyzed the Complaints and Pronouncements of crimes against the lives of women committed in Recife between 2015 and 2020, in order to observe the arguments presented by the Public Ministry and by the judges that act in the four branches of the Jury Court of the capital to apply the qualifier. Among the main results of the study, the following stand out: i) the SJC has been slow to investigate, prosecute and prosecute the murders of women; ii) the feminicide qualifier is no longer applied even in cases where the accused were men with whom the victims had a family or affectionate relationship; iii) the procedural instruction phase is not used to identify elements that can help in the application of the qualifier; and iv) the racial profiling of victims is completely ignored. Such findings point to the need to train SJC agents. Finally, looking to the future, the present academic study encourages thinking about alternatives to face Femicide away from the punitive power, while making recommendations to the Policy to Combat Violence against Women in Pernambuco, aiming to avoid revictimization and prevent re-victimization. occurrence of the crime.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-05-20T16:56:32Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022-03-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SILVA, Fábia Lopes Gomes da. Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher? a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife. 2022. 158 f Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2022.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1581
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Fábia Lopes Gomes da. Feminicídio ou homicídio doloso contra a mulher? a narrativa sociojurídica da promotoria e dos juízos das varas do Tribunal do Júri para caracterizar crimes contra a vida de mulheres na cidade do Recife. 2022. 158 f Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2022.
url http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1581
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -8801357989282212839
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -8854052368273140835
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7277407233034425144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNICAP
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Pós-Graduação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron:UNICAP
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
instacron_str UNICAP
institution UNICAP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/5/Ok_fabia_lopes_gomes_silva.pdf
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/2/license_url
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/3/license_text
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/4/license_rdf
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1581/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ce596b2836172df5046df1a9334d079a
4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br
_version_ 1811737525212938240