Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1373 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of Constitutional Courts in contemporary democracies, in order to comprehend the limits of the Federal Supreme Court's competence in decriminalizing abortion. The increasing judicialization of politics has demanded a particular and proactive attitude from the judge, legal instruments apposite to inquires of a restless society seeking for visibility. These new challenges given to the Judiciary resulted in a political participation of the judge, for who, in his eagerness to do justice, courses the path of judicial activism bringing about tension between the political system and the legal system. The Supreme Court − guardian and interpreter of the Constitution − whenever is vindicated, has showed in recent decades an extension of its function that goes beyond the interpreter and the holder who has the final say; in the increase of constitutional precepts of high semantic openness, reveals nearly a legal capacity aspect. This extremely empowered attitude from the judge arouses academic curiosities about the limits of his performance in the implement of rights. The study does not perceive the praiseworthy aspect; however, it perceives whether in making a political decision, the Supreme Court finds the theoretical field to delimit the borderline between the legislator and the judge, especially when solving a complex issue, highly charged of feelings, such as decriminalization of the abortion. Themes related to the new rights guaranteed by the democratic constitutions − equality, freedom, self-determination − involved in human dignity, are dependent on the creative power and intellectual capacity of the judge to assign a constitutional foundation in the realization of a right, especially when passiveness of the legislator occurs. The claim of constitutional visibility by social groups and movements requires a committed balanced analysis, mainly because the political choice of the legislator can be assessed by social control and reevaluated by the judge; however, the judicial right resulted by decision of the Supreme Court, which has the final say, is far from that accountability. Due to the increasing politicization of justice and the judicialization of politics, it is important to discuss the role of the constitutional judge and the limits of jurisdictional activity, when strained on the activity of legislature. Therefore, discussing about the oscillating boundary of the judge's power to interpret the Constitution or to exacerbate that power is essential. Regarding decriminalizing abortion, The STF, when compared to the Constitutional Courts and Courts involved in this study, besides justifying an anti-democratic scenario by delegation of decisionmaking powers from the political arena, shows the broadening of the judiciary's performance beyond institutional capacities, and the power dispute – even among its members − compared to the foreign courts that have decided on the subject. The voices of the streets need to be heard at the locus of constitutional legitimacy, so that it does not remain to the judge only the open parameters of the Constitution, when deciding matters of public morality and adjudicating the role of protagonist of the democratic process. |
id |
UCAP_95166ffdffd71d99920e7b2461c23e71 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/1373 |
network_acronym_str |
UCAP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
repository_id_str |
4646 |
spelling |
Leite, Glauco SalomãoAraújo, Marcelo Labanca Correa dePiaia, Thami CovattiBarbosa, Maria Lúciahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8110470335811398Paulino, Ezi Francisca da Silva2021-04-05T17:30:26Z2019-09-16PAULINO, Ezi Francisca da Silva. Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto . 2019. 137 fl. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2019.http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1373The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of Constitutional Courts in contemporary democracies, in order to comprehend the limits of the Federal Supreme Court's competence in decriminalizing abortion. The increasing judicialization of politics has demanded a particular and proactive attitude from the judge, legal instruments apposite to inquires of a restless society seeking for visibility. These new challenges given to the Judiciary resulted in a political participation of the judge, for who, in his eagerness to do justice, courses the path of judicial activism bringing about tension between the political system and the legal system. The Supreme Court − guardian and interpreter of the Constitution − whenever is vindicated, has showed in recent decades an extension of its function that goes beyond the interpreter and the holder who has the final say; in the increase of constitutional precepts of high semantic openness, reveals nearly a legal capacity aspect. This extremely empowered attitude from the judge arouses academic curiosities about the limits of his performance in the implement of rights. The study does not perceive the praiseworthy aspect; however, it perceives whether in making a political decision, the Supreme Court finds the theoretical field to delimit the borderline between the legislator and the judge, especially when solving a complex issue, highly charged of feelings, such as decriminalization of the abortion. Themes related to the new rights guaranteed by the democratic constitutions − equality, freedom, self-determination − involved in human dignity, are dependent on the creative power and intellectual capacity of the judge to assign a constitutional foundation in the realization of a right, especially when passiveness of the legislator occurs. The claim of constitutional visibility by social groups and movements requires a committed balanced analysis, mainly because the political choice of the legislator can be assessed by social control and reevaluated by the judge; however, the judicial right resulted by decision of the Supreme Court, which has the final say, is far from that accountability. Due to the increasing politicization of justice and the judicialization of politics, it is important to discuss the role of the constitutional judge and the limits of jurisdictional activity, when strained on the activity of legislature. Therefore, discussing about the oscillating boundary of the judge's power to interpret the Constitution or to exacerbate that power is essential. Regarding decriminalizing abortion, The STF, when compared to the Constitutional Courts and Courts involved in this study, besides justifying an anti-democratic scenario by delegation of decisionmaking powers from the political arena, shows the broadening of the judiciary's performance beyond institutional capacities, and the power dispute – even among its members − compared to the foreign courts that have decided on the subject. The voices of the streets need to be heard at the locus of constitutional legitimacy, so that it does not remain to the judge only the open parameters of the Constitution, when deciding matters of public morality and adjudicating the role of protagonist of the democratic process.Este estudo tem por objetivo analisar a função dos Tribunais Constitucionais nas democracias contemporâneas, para entender os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. A crescente judicialização da política tem exigido do juiz uma postura diferenciada e proativa, instrumentos jurídicos hábeis aos questionamentos de uma sociedade inquieta que busca visibilidade. Esses novos desafios postos ao Judiciário têm resultado numa participação política do juiz, que na ânsia de fazer justiça percorre as vias do ativismo judicial provocando tensão entre o sistema político e o sistema jurídico. O STF ¬ intérprete e guardião da Constituição ¬ sempre que vindicado, tem revelado nas últimas décadas um alargamento de sua função para além de intérprete e detentor da última palavra na densificação de preceitos constitucionais de elevada abertura semântica, revela uma faceta quase legiferante. Essa postura altamente empoderada do juiz, desperta curiosidades acadêmicas sobre os limites de sua atuação na concretização de direitos. O estudo não observa o aspecto meritório, mas, em saber se ao elaborar uma decisão política, o STF encontra campo teórico para delimitar a linha fronteiriça entre o legislador e o julgador, especialmente ao resolver sobre questão complexa, cheia de sentimentos como a descriminalização do aborto. Temas conexos aos novos direitos garantidos pelas constituições democráticas ¬ igualdade, liberdade, autodeterminação-, envoltos à dignidade humana, são dependentes do poder criativo e da capacidade intelectual do juiz para atribuir um fundamento constitucional na concretização de um direito, mormente quando há inércia do legislador. A reivindicação de visibilidade constitucional por grupos e movimentos sociais exige uma análise compromissada com lastro nos freios e contrapesos, principalmente porque a escolha política do legislador pode ser avaliada pelo controle social e reavaliada pelo juiz, mas, o direito judicial, construído de decisão do STF como detentor da última palavra fica distante dessa prestação de contas. Diante da crescente politização da justiça e da judicialização da política é importante discutir o papel do juiz constitucional e os limites da atividade jurisdicional quando tensionada com a atividade do legislador. Por isso é essencial o debate sobre a fronteira pendular do poder do juiz interpretar a Constituição ou de exacerbar esse poder. O STF na descriminalização do aborto, comparativamente com as Cortes e Tribunais Constitucionais envolvidos nesse estudo, além de justificar um cenário juristocrático com transferência dos poderes decisórios da arena política, mostra o alargamento da atuação do judiciário além das capacidades institucionais e, a disputa do poder decisório ¬inclusive entre seus membros ¬, em comparação com as cortes estrangeiras que decidiram sobre o tema. As vozes das ruas precisam ser ouvidas no locus de legitimidade constitucional, para que não sobre ao juiz apenas os parâmetros abertos da Constituição quando decidir questões da moralidade pública e adjudicar o papel de protagonista do processo democrático.Submitted by Biblioteca Central (biblioteca@unicap.br) on 2021-04-05T17:30:26Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Ok_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdf: 2982142 bytes, checksum: 3431b09151720d29b52671305fe22a6c (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2021-04-05T17:30:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Ok_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdf: 2982142 bytes, checksum: 3431b09151720d29b52671305fe22a6c (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-09-16application/pdfporUniversidade Católica de PernambucoMestrado em DireitoUNICAPBrasilDepartamento de Pós-Graduaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDissertaçõesAbortoJurisdiçãoControle da constitucionalidadeDissertaçõesAbortionJurisdictionControl of constitutionalityCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOOs limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-8801357989282212839500500600-8854052368273140835-7277407233034425144reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAPinstname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)instacron:UNICAPORIGINALOk_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdfOk_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdfapplication/pdf2982142http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/5/Ok_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdf3431b09151720d29b52671305fe22a6cMD55CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-849http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/2/license_url4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2fMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-80http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/3/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-80http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/4/license_rdfd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82170http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/1/license.txt5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8MD51tede/13732021-04-05 14:30:26.545oai:tede2.unicap.br:tede/1373Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.unicap.br:8080/http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/oai/requestbiblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.bropendoar:46462021-04-05T17:30:26Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
title |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
spellingShingle |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. Paulino, Ezi Francisca da Silva Dissertações Aborto Jurisdição Controle da constitucionalidade Dissertações Abortion Jurisdiction Control of constitutionality CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
title_full |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
title_fullStr |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
title_sort |
Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto. |
author |
Paulino, Ezi Francisca da Silva |
author_facet |
Paulino, Ezi Francisca da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Leite, Glauco Salomão |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Araújo, Marcelo Labanca Correa de |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Piaia, Thami Covatti |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Barbosa, Maria Lúcia |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8110470335811398 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paulino, Ezi Francisca da Silva |
contributor_str_mv |
Leite, Glauco Salomão Araújo, Marcelo Labanca Correa de Piaia, Thami Covatti Barbosa, Maria Lúcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dissertações Aborto Jurisdição Controle da constitucionalidade |
topic |
Dissertações Aborto Jurisdição Controle da constitucionalidade Dissertações Abortion Jurisdiction Control of constitutionality CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Dissertações Abortion Jurisdiction Control of constitutionality |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The purpose of this study is to analyze the role of Constitutional Courts in contemporary democracies, in order to comprehend the limits of the Federal Supreme Court's competence in decriminalizing abortion. The increasing judicialization of politics has demanded a particular and proactive attitude from the judge, legal instruments apposite to inquires of a restless society seeking for visibility. These new challenges given to the Judiciary resulted in a political participation of the judge, for who, in his eagerness to do justice, courses the path of judicial activism bringing about tension between the political system and the legal system. The Supreme Court − guardian and interpreter of the Constitution − whenever is vindicated, has showed in recent decades an extension of its function that goes beyond the interpreter and the holder who has the final say; in the increase of constitutional precepts of high semantic openness, reveals nearly a legal capacity aspect. This extremely empowered attitude from the judge arouses academic curiosities about the limits of his performance in the implement of rights. The study does not perceive the praiseworthy aspect; however, it perceives whether in making a political decision, the Supreme Court finds the theoretical field to delimit the borderline between the legislator and the judge, especially when solving a complex issue, highly charged of feelings, such as decriminalization of the abortion. Themes related to the new rights guaranteed by the democratic constitutions − equality, freedom, self-determination − involved in human dignity, are dependent on the creative power and intellectual capacity of the judge to assign a constitutional foundation in the realization of a right, especially when passiveness of the legislator occurs. The claim of constitutional visibility by social groups and movements requires a committed balanced analysis, mainly because the political choice of the legislator can be assessed by social control and reevaluated by the judge; however, the judicial right resulted by decision of the Supreme Court, which has the final say, is far from that accountability. Due to the increasing politicization of justice and the judicialization of politics, it is important to discuss the role of the constitutional judge and the limits of jurisdictional activity, when strained on the activity of legislature. Therefore, discussing about the oscillating boundary of the judge's power to interpret the Constitution or to exacerbate that power is essential. Regarding decriminalizing abortion, The STF, when compared to the Constitutional Courts and Courts involved in this study, besides justifying an anti-democratic scenario by delegation of decisionmaking powers from the political arena, shows the broadening of the judiciary's performance beyond institutional capacities, and the power dispute – even among its members − compared to the foreign courts that have decided on the subject. The voices of the streets need to be heard at the locus of constitutional legitimacy, so that it does not remain to the judge only the open parameters of the Constitution, when deciding matters of public morality and adjudicating the role of protagonist of the democratic process. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-16 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-05T17:30:26Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
PAULINO, Ezi Francisca da Silva. Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto . 2019. 137 fl. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2019. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1373 |
identifier_str_mv |
PAULINO, Ezi Francisca da Silva. Os limites da competência do Supremo Tribunal Federal na descriminalização do aborto . 2019. 137 fl. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco. Programa de Pós-graduação em Direito. Mestrado em Direito, 2019. |
url |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1373 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-8801357989282212839 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-8854052368273140835 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-7277407233034425144 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Mestrado em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNICAP |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Pós-Graduação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP instname:Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) instacron:UNICAP |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAP |
institution |
UNICAP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/5/Ok_ezi_francisca_silva_paulino.pdf http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/2/license_url http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/3/license_text http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/4/license_rdf http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/bitstream/tede/1373/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3431b09151720d29b52671305fe22a6c 4afdbb8c545fd630ea7db775da747b2f d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e 5d71329502a0e313f28be890c62f4ad8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNICAP - Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (UNICAP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca@unicap.br||biblioteca@unicap.br |
_version_ |
1803085501697097728 |