Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saraiva, Flávio Victor
Data de Publicação: 2010
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UCB
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/2417
Resumo: Direito
id UCB-2_45ba577f10158aae19d236f16ca4cd3f
oai_identifier_str oai:200.214.135.189:10869/2417
network_acronym_str UCB-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
spelling Saraiva, Flávio Victor2013-11-27T16:53:15Z2016-10-10T03:35:27Z2017-01-25T18:51:53Z2013-11-27T16:53:15Z2016-10-10T03:35:27Z2017-01-25T18:51:53Z2010-11-16SOUZA, Flávio Victor Saraiva de. Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa. 2010. 71 f. Monografia (Graduação) – Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2010.https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/2417DireitoO trabalho em questão tratará do controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa, abordando aspectos históricos e seu conceito, assim como os princípios que regem a discricionariedade até chegar ao âmbito do controle judicial. Antigamente a esfera judiciária não podia revisar os atos administrativos, devido ao princípio da separação dos poderes. A própria Administração tinha o papel de legislar, executar e revisar os seus próprios atos. Com o passar do tempo, foi se aprimorando o pensamento de que nem todos os atos da administração eram imunes ao Poder judiciário. Dessa forma, vários princípios constitucionais passaram a ser fundamento para análise da discricionariedade. Atualmente, diversas jurisprudências pacificam o entendimento de que a discricionariedade é absolutamente controlável, uma vez que, diante da liberdade dada ao administrador para agir conforme a melhor opção, a ele se devem aplicar limites para que não use a competência atribuída pela lei de forma abusiva ou arbitrária.The work in question will address the jurisdictional control of administrative discretion, regarding historical aspects and its concept as well as the principles governing the discretion to reach the scope of judicial review. Previously the judiciary could not review the administrative acts, given the principle of separation of powers. The Administration itself had a role to legislate, implement and review their own actions. Over time, has been refining the thought that not all administrative acts were immune to the Judiciary. Thus, several constitutional principles became the foundation for the analysis of discretion. Currently, several rulings pacify the understanding that discretion is absolutely controllable, since, given the freedom given to the administrator to act as the best option, he must apply to limits that do not use the powers conferred by law improperly or arbitrary.Submitted by Juliana Pereira (juliana.pereira@ucb.br) on 2013-11-23T15:01:42Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20618 bytes, checksum: b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7 (MD5) Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf: 354042 bytes, checksum: f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Kelson Anthony de Menezes(kelson@ucb.br) on 2013-11-27T16:53:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20618 bytes, checksum: b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7 (MD5) Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf: 354042 bytes, checksum: f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2013-11-27T16:53:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20618 bytes, checksum: b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7 (MD5) Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf: 354042 bytes, checksum: f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-11-16Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-10T03:35:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf: 354042 bytes, checksum: f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30 (MD5) license_url: 46 bytes, checksum: 0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf (MD5) license_text: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) license_rdf: 20618 bytes, checksum: b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7 (MD5) license.txt: 1876 bytes, checksum: 15d8b3845c3fb477e8d52e515cf366db (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-11-16Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-25T18:51:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf.txt: 165657 bytes, checksum: 086fe5f17bc1ab469948de91e9c3b781 (MD5) Flavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf: 354042 bytes, checksum: f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30 (MD5) license_url: 46 bytes, checksum: 0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf (MD5) license_text: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) license_rdf: 20618 bytes, checksum: b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7 (MD5) license.txt: 1876 bytes, checksum: 15d8b3845c3fb477e8d52e515cf366db (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-11-16TextoDiscricionariedadeJudiciárioAdministraçãoAtoPoderDireitoJudiciaryActDiscretionaryManagementPowerControle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBTEXTFlavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain165657https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/1/Flavio%20Victor%20Saraiva%20de%20Souza.pdf.txt086fe5f17bc1ab469948de91e9c3b781MD51ORIGINALFlavio Victor Saraiva de Souza.pdfMonografiaapplication/pdf354042https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/2/Flavio%20Victor%20Saraiva%20de%20Souza.pdff111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30MD52CC-LICENSElicense_urlapplication/octet-stream46https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/3/license_url0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccfMD53license_textapplication/octet-stream0https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/4/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54license_rdfapplication/octet-stream20618https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/5/license_rdfb67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7MD55LICENSElicense.txttext/plain1876https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/6/license.txt15d8b3845c3fb477e8d52e515cf366dbMD5610869/24172017-01-25 16:51:53.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Repositório de Publicaçõeshttps://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
title Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
spellingShingle Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
Saraiva, Flávio Victor
Discricionariedade
Judiciário
Administração
Ato
Poder
Direito
Judiciary
Act
Discretionary
Management
Power
title_short Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
title_full Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
title_fullStr Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
title_full_unstemmed Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
title_sort Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa
author Saraiva, Flávio Victor
author_facet Saraiva, Flávio Victor
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saraiva, Flávio Victor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Discricionariedade
Judiciário
Administração
Ato
Poder
Direito
Judiciary
Act
Discretionary
Management
Power
topic Discricionariedade
Judiciário
Administração
Ato
Poder
Direito
Judiciary
Act
Discretionary
Management
Power
dc.description.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv Direito
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv O trabalho em questão tratará do controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa, abordando aspectos históricos e seu conceito, assim como os princípios que regem a discricionariedade até chegar ao âmbito do controle judicial. Antigamente a esfera judiciária não podia revisar os atos administrativos, devido ao princípio da separação dos poderes. A própria Administração tinha o papel de legislar, executar e revisar os seus próprios atos. Com o passar do tempo, foi se aprimorando o pensamento de que nem todos os atos da administração eram imunes ao Poder judiciário. Dessa forma, vários princípios constitucionais passaram a ser fundamento para análise da discricionariedade. Atualmente, diversas jurisprudências pacificam o entendimento de que a discricionariedade é absolutamente controlável, uma vez que, diante da liberdade dada ao administrador para agir conforme a melhor opção, a ele se devem aplicar limites para que não use a competência atribuída pela lei de forma abusiva ou arbitrária.
The work in question will address the jurisdictional control of administrative discretion, regarding historical aspects and its concept as well as the principles governing the discretion to reach the scope of judicial review. Previously the judiciary could not review the administrative acts, given the principle of separation of powers. The Administration itself had a role to legislate, implement and review their own actions. Over time, has been refining the thought that not all administrative acts were immune to the Judiciary. Thus, several constitutional principles became the foundation for the analysis of discretion. Currently, several rulings pacify the understanding that discretion is absolutely controllable, since, given the freedom given to the administrator to act as the best option, he must apply to limits that do not use the powers conferred by law improperly or arbitrary.
description Direito
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2010-11-16
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2013-11-27T16:53:15Z
2016-10-10T03:35:27Z
2017-01-25T18:51:53Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2013-11-27T16:53:15Z
2016-10-10T03:35:27Z
2017-01-25T18:51:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SOUZA, Flávio Victor Saraiva de. Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa. 2010. 71 f. Monografia (Graduação) – Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2010.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/2417
identifier_str_mv SOUZA, Flávio Victor Saraiva de. Controle jurisdicional da discricionariedade administrativa. 2010. 71 f. Monografia (Graduação) – Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2010.
url https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/2417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
collection Repositório Institucional da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/1/Flavio%20Victor%20Saraiva%20de%20Souza.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/2/Flavio%20Victor%20Saraiva%20de%20Souza.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/3/license_url
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/4/license_text
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/5/license_rdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/2417/6/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 086fe5f17bc1ab469948de91e9c3b781
f111acef2e43c875b3e5cb87ac7ecc30
0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
b67ac4fa37d756ac08366dbc4e32ada7
15d8b3845c3fb477e8d52e515cf366db
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829858100412416

Registros relacionados