O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo
Data de Publicação: 2007
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UCB
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/3419
Resumo: Direito
id UCB-2_a8a471b80f283434234a5ecb4a484a7c
oai_identifier_str oai:200.214.135.189:10869/3419
network_acronym_str UCB-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
spelling Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo2014-04-14T20:30:05Z2016-10-10T03:32:52Z2017-01-25T18:38:34Z2014-04-14T20:30:05Z2016-10-10T03:32:52Z2017-01-25T18:38:34Z2007MESQUITA, Leila Cristina de Louredo. O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri. 2007. 76 f. Monografia (Graduação) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2007.https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/3419DireitoEste trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar os aspectos de “O Poder do Debate para o Convencimento do Conselho de Sentença no Tribunal do Júri”, apresentando o surgimento e a evolução histórica do Tribunal do Júri no mundo e, principalmente, no Brasil. Apresenta também os Princípios Constitucionais vinculados ao Tribunal do Júri, mostrando os seus conceitos e características basilares na instituição do Júri. Nem todos os crimes são julgados pelo Tribunal do Júri, somente os crimes dolosos contra a vida constantes nos artigos 121 a 127 do Código Penal Brasileiro. Como consta na Constituição Federal, a função precípua do Ministério Público é a capacidade de, privativamente, propor ação penal pública, oferecendo denúncia acerca da autoria do crime tendo certeza ou indícios do fato-crime. Com a apresentação da denúncia, o Ministério Público torna-se parte no processo, analisando e fundamentando a sua tese mediante subsídios legais e técnicos, apresentando no decurso do processo o chamado libelo crime acusatório. Outra parte fundamental no processo é o defensor, que tem como papel demonstrar ao Conselho de Sentença o melhor direito a ser aplicado em benefício do seu cliente ou em caso contrário os motivos que o levaram a cometer tal crime. O ponto culminante deste trabalho é a apresentação das características do debate, em plenário, entre a acusação e a defesa para o convencimento do Conselho de Sentença. No decorrer do debate, podem acontecer os apartes (interrupções), muitas vezes, não aceitos pela parte contrária, pois estes distraem e interrompem o raciocínio dos jurados e até mesmo do debatedor.This work has as objective to present the aspects of “the Power of the Debate for the Persuation of the Petit jury in the Court of the Jury”, presenting the sprouting and the historical evolution of the Court of the Jury in the world and, mainly, Brazil. It also presents the entailed Principles Constitutional to the Court of the Jury, showing its fundamental concepts and characteristics in the institution of the Jury. Nor all the crimes are judged by the Court of the Jury, only the felonies against the life constant in articles 121 the 127 of the Brazilian Criminal Code. As it consists in the Federal Constitution, the main function of the Public prosecution service is the capacity of, privatively, considering public criminal action, offering to denunciation concerning the authorship of the crime having certainty or indications of the fact-crime. With the presentation of the denunciation, the Public prosecution service becomes part in the process, analyzing and basing its thesis by means of legal subsidies and technician, presenting in the continuation of the process the call libel accusatory crime. Another basic part in the process is the defender, who has as paper to demonstrate to the right optimum Petit jury to be applied in benefit of its customer or contrary case the reasons that had taken it to commit such crime. The culminating point of this work is the presentation of the characteristics of the debate, in plenary assembly, between the accusation and the defense for the persuation of the Petit jury. In elapsing of the debate, the aside remarks can happen (interruptions), many times, not accepted for the adversary party, therefore these even though distract and interrupt the reasoning of the juries and of the debatedor.Submitted by Juliana Pereira (juliana.pereira@ucb.br) on 2014-04-11T14:43:42Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20168 bytes, checksum: 288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc (MD5) Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf: 418573 bytes, checksum: 64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Kelson Anthony de Menezes(kelson@ucb.br) on 2014-04-14T20:30:05Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20168 bytes, checksum: 288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc (MD5) Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf: 418573 bytes, checksum: 64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2014-04-14T20:30:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 20168 bytes, checksum: 288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc (MD5) Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf: 418573 bytes, checksum: 64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-10T03:32:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf: 418573 bytes, checksum: 64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196 (MD5) license_url: 46 bytes, checksum: 0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf (MD5) license_text: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) license_rdf: 20168 bytes, checksum: 288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc (MD5) license.txt: 1877 bytes, checksum: 84662e9ff0de521fe5e714c111389722 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-25T18:38:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 6 Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf.txt: 163178 bytes, checksum: f30814c7206f5ef708ae5fcbe72480e4 (MD5) Leila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf: 418573 bytes, checksum: 64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196 (MD5) license_url: 46 bytes, checksum: 0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf (MD5) license_text: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) license_rdf: 20168 bytes, checksum: 288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc (MD5) license.txt: 1877 bytes, checksum: 84662e9ff0de521fe5e714c111389722 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007TextoDebateConselho de sentençaTribunal do júriMinistério PúblicoDefesaApartesDireitoDebatePetit juryCourt of the juryPublic prosecution serviceProhibitedAside remarksO poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBTEXTLeila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain163178https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/1/Leila%20Cristina%20de%20Louredo%20Mesquita.pdf.txtf30814c7206f5ef708ae5fcbe72480e4MD51ORIGINALLeila Cristina de Louredo Mesquita.pdfMonografiaapplication/pdf418573https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/2/Leila%20Cristina%20de%20Louredo%20Mesquita.pdf64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196MD52CC-LICENSElicense_urlapplication/octet-stream46https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/3/license_url0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccfMD53license_textapplication/octet-stream0https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/4/license_textd41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427eMD54license_rdfapplication/octet-stream20168https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/5/license_rdf288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bcMD55LICENSElicense.txttext/plain1877https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/6/license.txt84662e9ff0de521fe5e714c111389722MD5610869/34192017-01-25 16:38:34.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Repositório de Publicaçõeshttps://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
title O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
spellingShingle O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo
Debate
Conselho de sentença
Tribunal do júri
Ministério Público
Defesa
Apartes
Direito
Debate
Petit jury
Court of the jury
Public prosecution service
Prohibited
Aside remarks
title_short O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
title_full O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
title_fullStr O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
title_full_unstemmed O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
title_sort O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri
author Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo
author_facet Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mesquita, Leila Cristina de Louredo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Debate
Conselho de sentença
Tribunal do júri
Ministério Público
Defesa
Apartes
Direito
Debate
Petit jury
Court of the jury
Public prosecution service
Prohibited
Aside remarks
topic Debate
Conselho de sentença
Tribunal do júri
Ministério Público
Defesa
Apartes
Direito
Debate
Petit jury
Court of the jury
Public prosecution service
Prohibited
Aside remarks
dc.description.pt_BR.fl_txt_mv Direito
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv Este trabalho tem como objetivo apresentar os aspectos de “O Poder do Debate para o Convencimento do Conselho de Sentença no Tribunal do Júri”, apresentando o surgimento e a evolução histórica do Tribunal do Júri no mundo e, principalmente, no Brasil. Apresenta também os Princípios Constitucionais vinculados ao Tribunal do Júri, mostrando os seus conceitos e características basilares na instituição do Júri. Nem todos os crimes são julgados pelo Tribunal do Júri, somente os crimes dolosos contra a vida constantes nos artigos 121 a 127 do Código Penal Brasileiro. Como consta na Constituição Federal, a função precípua do Ministério Público é a capacidade de, privativamente, propor ação penal pública, oferecendo denúncia acerca da autoria do crime tendo certeza ou indícios do fato-crime. Com a apresentação da denúncia, o Ministério Público torna-se parte no processo, analisando e fundamentando a sua tese mediante subsídios legais e técnicos, apresentando no decurso do processo o chamado libelo crime acusatório. Outra parte fundamental no processo é o defensor, que tem como papel demonstrar ao Conselho de Sentença o melhor direito a ser aplicado em benefício do seu cliente ou em caso contrário os motivos que o levaram a cometer tal crime. O ponto culminante deste trabalho é a apresentação das características do debate, em plenário, entre a acusação e a defesa para o convencimento do Conselho de Sentença. No decorrer do debate, podem acontecer os apartes (interrupções), muitas vezes, não aceitos pela parte contrária, pois estes distraem e interrompem o raciocínio dos jurados e até mesmo do debatedor.
This work has as objective to present the aspects of “the Power of the Debate for the Persuation of the Petit jury in the Court of the Jury”, presenting the sprouting and the historical evolution of the Court of the Jury in the world and, mainly, Brazil. It also presents the entailed Principles Constitutional to the Court of the Jury, showing its fundamental concepts and characteristics in the institution of the Jury. Nor all the crimes are judged by the Court of the Jury, only the felonies against the life constant in articles 121 the 127 of the Brazilian Criminal Code. As it consists in the Federal Constitution, the main function of the Public prosecution service is the capacity of, privatively, considering public criminal action, offering to denunciation concerning the authorship of the crime having certainty or indications of the fact-crime. With the presentation of the denunciation, the Public prosecution service becomes part in the process, analyzing and basing its thesis by means of legal subsidies and technician, presenting in the continuation of the process the call libel accusatory crime. Another basic part in the process is the defender, who has as paper to demonstrate to the right optimum Petit jury to be applied in benefit of its customer or contrary case the reasons that had taken it to commit such crime. The culminating point of this work is the presentation of the characteristics of the debate, in plenary assembly, between the accusation and the defense for the persuation of the Petit jury. In elapsing of the debate, the aside remarks can happen (interruptions), many times, not accepted for the adversary party, therefore these even though distract and interrupt the reasoning of the juries and of the debatedor.
description Direito
publishDate 2007
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2007
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-04-14T20:30:05Z
2016-10-10T03:32:52Z
2017-01-25T18:38:34Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-04-14T20:30:05Z
2016-10-10T03:32:52Z
2017-01-25T18:38:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MESQUITA, Leila Cristina de Louredo. O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri. 2007. 76 f. Monografia (Graduação) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2007.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/3419
identifier_str_mv MESQUITA, Leila Cristina de Louredo. O poder do debate para o convencimento do conselho de sentença no tribunal do júri. 2007. 76 f. Monografia (Graduação) - Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, 2007.
url https://repositorio.ucb.br:9443/jspui/handle/10869/3419
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Texto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UCB
collection Repositório Institucional da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/1/Leila%20Cristina%20de%20Louredo%20Mesquita.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/2/Leila%20Cristina%20de%20Louredo%20Mesquita.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/3/license_url
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/4/license_text
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/5/license_rdf
https://200.214.135.178:9443/jspui/bitstream/10869/3419/6/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f30814c7206f5ef708ae5fcbe72480e4
64b728eeca89eef2362f46740e18d196
0d2fb706760bf56ddf1358a832652ccf
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e
288037d582f66c131a3b54761360a7bc
84662e9ff0de521fe5e714c111389722
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829847333634048

Registros relacionados