The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Economic Analysis of law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/12474 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article was to analyze the impeachment process that took place in Brazil in 2016 and through Game Theory. Three games were created with the following players: president of the Chamber of Deputies, the National Congress, the president of the Republic and his deputy. The games take place via perfect but incomplete information. The theme is current, relevant and without studies that relate to Game Theory. Therefore, unprecedented. We tried to show the possible results and the political aspects and it was concluded that in most of the cases the filed cases. Between 1990 and 2018 the suggested game was played 193 times, judging by the number of complaints filed, of which only 2 were filed. Finally, this work showed the movements of the parties between the 2014 election and the impeachment vote in 2016, suggesting that the referred process is also a political judgment. Not just criminal. |
id |
UCB-6_b29887d85ec440bac03f4e9fb1a5406b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/12474 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-6 |
network_name_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game TheoryIncomplete Information Bayesian game Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Games.The purpose of this article was to analyze the impeachment process that took place in Brazil in 2016 and through Game Theory. Three games were created with the following players: president of the Chamber of Deputies, the National Congress, the president of the Republic and his deputy. The games take place via perfect but incomplete information. The theme is current, relevant and without studies that relate to Game Theory. Therefore, unprecedented. We tried to show the possible results and the political aspects and it was concluded that in most of the cases the filed cases. Between 1990 and 2018 the suggested game was played 193 times, judging by the number of complaints filed, of which only 2 were filed. Finally, this work showed the movements of the parties between the 2014 election and the impeachment vote in 2016, suggesting that the referred process is also a political judgment. Not just criminal.Universidade Católica de Brasília2022-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionGame TheoryAvaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1247410.31501/ealr.v12i3.12474Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-52Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-52Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 12 n. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-522178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBenghttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/12474/7644Copyright (c) 2022 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDal Moro, Odirlei FernandoMichellon, EdnaldoBernadeli, Luan ViniciusBotelho, Martinho Martins2023-06-15T18:36:59Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/12474Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2023-06-15T18:36:59Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
title |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
spellingShingle |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory Dal Moro, Odirlei Fernando Incomplete Information Bayesian game Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Games. |
title_short |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
title_full |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
title_fullStr |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
title_sort |
The Political Game of Impeachment in Brazil and The Case of 2016 Analyzed Using Game Theory |
author |
Dal Moro, Odirlei Fernando |
author_facet |
Dal Moro, Odirlei Fernando Michellon, Ednaldo Bernadeli, Luan Vinicius Botelho, Martinho Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Michellon, Ednaldo Bernadeli, Luan Vinicius Botelho, Martinho Martins |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dal Moro, Odirlei Fernando Michellon, Ednaldo Bernadeli, Luan Vinicius Botelho, Martinho Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Incomplete Information Bayesian game Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Games. |
topic |
Incomplete Information Bayesian game Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Games. |
description |
The purpose of this article was to analyze the impeachment process that took place in Brazil in 2016 and through Game Theory. Three games were created with the following players: president of the Chamber of Deputies, the National Congress, the president of the Republic and his deputy. The games take place via perfect but incomplete information. The theme is current, relevant and without studies that relate to Game Theory. Therefore, unprecedented. We tried to show the possible results and the political aspects and it was concluded that in most of the cases the filed cases. Between 1990 and 2018 the suggested game was played 193 times, judging by the number of complaints filed, of which only 2 were filed. Finally, this work showed the movements of the parties between the 2014 election and the impeachment vote in 2016, suggesting that the referred process is also a political judgment. Not just criminal. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Game Theory Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/12474 10.31501/ealr.v12i3.12474 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/12474 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31501/ealr.v12i3.12474 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/12474/7644 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Economic Analysis of Law Review info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Economic Analysis of Law Review |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-52 Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-52 Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 12 n. 3 (2021): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 23-52 2178-0587 reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
collection |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798675421059874816 |