The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vasquez Duque, Omar
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Economic Analysis of law Review
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593
Resumo: Loyalty rewards are pervasive. Airlines offer frequent flyer programs; credit cards offer miles, points, and cash-back; and groceries stores and pharmacies offer points to redeem “free” products. Despite their framing, however, “rewards” can harm consumers. Eminent academics have recently noted that while rewards lock consumers in and increase the prices of goods, courts and regulators have paid little attention to them. Noting how a “No Contract” trend emerged in long-term commitments after consumers learned that teaser introductory rates with a lock-in clause triggered subsequent exploitative rates, they concluded that consumers can also learn the costs of loyalty.In this paper, I develop an alternative view, arguing that there are economic and psychological obstacles for the rise of “No Loyalty”. Concerning the former, facing greater competition sellers need to retain consumers to stay in the market and make a profit. Loyalty rewards can lock consumers in, but they also allow sellers to obtain information about their customers. This information is critical for sellers, because it allows them to segment the market, and target tailored promotions and advertising to the most valuable costumers. The lack of a good database places a firm in a serious competitive disadvantage. Regarding the psychological obstacles, consumers tend to overestimate their value. Rewards can develop affective reactions and cravings on buyers. Consumers also prefer market with rewards because the bundle product-reward appears to be more valuable than it really is for a significant part of the market.The main implication of this work is that both, consumers and sellers, prefer markets with rewards. Accordingly, further research should shed light on the merits of legal intervention in particular markets. This work surveys the evolution rewards have shown in the financial and airline sectors, arguing that loyalty programs trigger particular problems in specific markets. This article also suggests that the costs of rewards are more severe than lock-in and higher prices. In addition to market-specific problems (such as regressive cross-subsidization and over-spending), rewards can create an illusion of advantage (which derives from the “medium effect”), triggering a behavioral market failure.
id UCB-6_b87d36c41b890fdea5a408ae91a965ed
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/8593
network_acronym_str UCB-6
network_name_str Economic Analysis of law Review
repository_id_str
spelling The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer WelfareLoyalty rewards consumer welfare consumer protectionLoyalty rewards are pervasive. Airlines offer frequent flyer programs; credit cards offer miles, points, and cash-back; and groceries stores and pharmacies offer points to redeem “free” products. Despite their framing, however, “rewards” can harm consumers. Eminent academics have recently noted that while rewards lock consumers in and increase the prices of goods, courts and regulators have paid little attention to them. Noting how a “No Contract” trend emerged in long-term commitments after consumers learned that teaser introductory rates with a lock-in clause triggered subsequent exploitative rates, they concluded that consumers can also learn the costs of loyalty.In this paper, I develop an alternative view, arguing that there are economic and psychological obstacles for the rise of “No Loyalty”. Concerning the former, facing greater competition sellers need to retain consumers to stay in the market and make a profit. Loyalty rewards can lock consumers in, but they also allow sellers to obtain information about their customers. This information is critical for sellers, because it allows them to segment the market, and target tailored promotions and advertising to the most valuable costumers. The lack of a good database places a firm in a serious competitive disadvantage. Regarding the psychological obstacles, consumers tend to overestimate their value. Rewards can develop affective reactions and cravings on buyers. Consumers also prefer market with rewards because the bundle product-reward appears to be more valuable than it really is for a significant part of the market.The main implication of this work is that both, consumers and sellers, prefer markets with rewards. Accordingly, further research should shed light on the merits of legal intervention in particular markets. This work surveys the evolution rewards have shown in the financial and airline sectors, arguing that loyalty programs trigger particular problems in specific markets. This article also suggests that the costs of rewards are more severe than lock-in and higher prices. In addition to market-specific problems (such as regressive cross-subsidization and over-spending), rewards can create an illusion of advantage (which derives from the “medium effect”), triggering a behavioral market failure.Universidade Católica de Brasília2017-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDescriptive analysis based on behavioral law and economics theoryAvaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-447Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-447Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-4472178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBenghttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593/5431Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasquez Duque, Omar2023-06-15T18:35:31Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/8593Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2023-06-15T18:35:31Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
title The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
spellingShingle The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
Vasquez Duque, Omar
Loyalty rewards
consumer welfare
consumer protection
title_short The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
title_full The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
title_fullStr The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
title_full_unstemmed The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
title_sort The Costs of Loyalty. On Loyalty Rewards and Consumer Welfare
author Vasquez Duque, Omar
author_facet Vasquez Duque, Omar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vasquez Duque, Omar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Loyalty rewards
consumer welfare
consumer protection
topic Loyalty rewards
consumer welfare
consumer protection
description Loyalty rewards are pervasive. Airlines offer frequent flyer programs; credit cards offer miles, points, and cash-back; and groceries stores and pharmacies offer points to redeem “free” products. Despite their framing, however, “rewards” can harm consumers. Eminent academics have recently noted that while rewards lock consumers in and increase the prices of goods, courts and regulators have paid little attention to them. Noting how a “No Contract” trend emerged in long-term commitments after consumers learned that teaser introductory rates with a lock-in clause triggered subsequent exploitative rates, they concluded that consumers can also learn the costs of loyalty.In this paper, I develop an alternative view, arguing that there are economic and psychological obstacles for the rise of “No Loyalty”. Concerning the former, facing greater competition sellers need to retain consumers to stay in the market and make a profit. Loyalty rewards can lock consumers in, but they also allow sellers to obtain information about their customers. This information is critical for sellers, because it allows them to segment the market, and target tailored promotions and advertising to the most valuable costumers. The lack of a good database places a firm in a serious competitive disadvantage. Regarding the psychological obstacles, consumers tend to overestimate their value. Rewards can develop affective reactions and cravings on buyers. Consumers also prefer market with rewards because the bundle product-reward appears to be more valuable than it really is for a significant part of the market.The main implication of this work is that both, consumers and sellers, prefer markets with rewards. Accordingly, further research should shed light on the merits of legal intervention in particular markets. This work surveys the evolution rewards have shown in the financial and airline sectors, arguing that loyalty programs trigger particular problems in specific markets. This article also suggests that the costs of rewards are more severe than lock-in and higher prices. In addition to market-specific problems (such as regressive cross-subsidization and over-spending), rewards can create an illusion of advantage (which derives from the “medium effect”), triggering a behavioral market failure.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Descriptive analysis based on behavioral law and economics theory
Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/8593/5431
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Economic Analysis of Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-447
Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-447
Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 8 n. 2 (2017): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 411-447
2178-0587
reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Economic Analysis of law Review
collection Economic Analysis of law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com
_version_ 1798675420627861504