Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: battesini, eugenio
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Economic Analysis of law Review
Texto Completo: https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11602
Resumo: The incremental Learned Hand standard is recognized as the main contribution of the law and economics literature to legal practice, as an objective criterion of negligence assessment. Traditionally, negligence gradation has been a factor considered by legal technology to allocate the damages. However, one of the main problems in legal practice lies in the establishment of objective criteria for quantitative assessment of the reduction or increase in the indemnity-damage ratio, considering the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim. Withal, is it possible to use the incremental Learned Hand standard as criterion of negligence graduation in order to allocate the damages? Using the theoretical foundations of law and economics literature in conjunction with the traditional legal classification of negligence into severe, ordinary and slight, and considering the Brazilian tort system as analytical basis, the paper shows that the answer is positive. The basic idea is that the incremental Learned Hand standard is an algorithm which can be employed in legal practice to systematize the allocation of damages, performing, according to the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim, the full compensation or the decouple of the indemnity from the damages, streamlining the application of legal institutes such as comparative negligence, punitive damages, and equitable reduction of compensation (fairness).
id UCB-6_daf1404d9f299c47d8bf6f664cf66a85
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/11602
network_acronym_str UCB-6
network_name_str Economic Analysis of law Review
repository_id_str
spelling Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics ApproachLaw and Economics. Comparative Law. Tort Law. Incremental Learned Hand Standard. Negligence. Damages. Brazil.The incremental Learned Hand standard is recognized as the main contribution of the law and economics literature to legal practice, as an objective criterion of negligence assessment. Traditionally, negligence gradation has been a factor considered by legal technology to allocate the damages. However, one of the main problems in legal practice lies in the establishment of objective criteria for quantitative assessment of the reduction or increase in the indemnity-damage ratio, considering the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim. Withal, is it possible to use the incremental Learned Hand standard as criterion of negligence graduation in order to allocate the damages? Using the theoretical foundations of law and economics literature in conjunction with the traditional legal classification of negligence into severe, ordinary and slight, and considering the Brazilian tort system as analytical basis, the paper shows that the answer is positive. The basic idea is that the incremental Learned Hand standard is an algorithm which can be employed in legal practice to systematize the allocation of damages, performing, according to the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim, the full compensation or the decouple of the indemnity from the damages, streamlining the application of legal institutes such as comparative negligence, punitive damages, and equitable reduction of compensation (fairness).Universidade Católica de Brasília2020-10-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLiterary AnalysisAvaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewedapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1160210.31501/ealr.v11i1.11602Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-79Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-79Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-792178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBenghttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11602/7108Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessbattesini, eugenio2021-05-19T15:21:24Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/11602Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2021-05-19T15:21:24Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
title Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
spellingShingle Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
battesini, eugenio
Law and Economics. Comparative Law. Tort Law. Incremental Learned Hand Standard. Negligence. Damages. Brazil.
title_short Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
title_full Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
title_fullStr Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
title_full_unstemmed Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
title_sort Incremental Learned Hand Standard, Degrees of Negligence and Allocation of Damages: a Comparative Tort Law and Economics Approach
author battesini, eugenio
author_facet battesini, eugenio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv battesini, eugenio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law and Economics. Comparative Law. Tort Law. Incremental Learned Hand Standard. Negligence. Damages. Brazil.
topic Law and Economics. Comparative Law. Tort Law. Incremental Learned Hand Standard. Negligence. Damages. Brazil.
description The incremental Learned Hand standard is recognized as the main contribution of the law and economics literature to legal practice, as an objective criterion of negligence assessment. Traditionally, negligence gradation has been a factor considered by legal technology to allocate the damages. However, one of the main problems in legal practice lies in the establishment of objective criteria for quantitative assessment of the reduction or increase in the indemnity-damage ratio, considering the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim. Withal, is it possible to use the incremental Learned Hand standard as criterion of negligence graduation in order to allocate the damages? Using the theoretical foundations of law and economics literature in conjunction with the traditional legal classification of negligence into severe, ordinary and slight, and considering the Brazilian tort system as analytical basis, the paper shows that the answer is positive. The basic idea is that the incremental Learned Hand standard is an algorithm which can be employed in legal practice to systematize the allocation of damages, performing, according to the degree of negligence of the injurer and of the victim, the full compensation or the decouple of the indemnity from the damages, streamlining the application of legal institutes such as comparative negligence, punitive damages, and equitable reduction of compensation (fairness).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Literary Analysis
Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11602
10.31501/ealr.v11i1.11602
url https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11602
identifier_str_mv 10.31501/ealr.v11i1.11602
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/11602/7108
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Economic Analysis of Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-79
Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-79
Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 11 n. 1 (2020): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 48-79
2178-0587
reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Economic Analysis of law Review
collection Economic Analysis of law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com
_version_ 1798675423256641536