Constitutional Economics and Public Choice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng spa |
Título da fonte: | Economic Analysis of law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456 |
Resumo: | From the Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem indicating the instability of the majoritarian rules, the theoreticians of Constitutional Economics/Public Choice extend the consequences of this theorem pointing as the decisions politics under majority leading the public sector to become enlarged beyond the constitutional limits fixed for it. The solutions proposed for this expansion must be placed in the proper Constitution, limiting and defining the permissible alternatives to the decisions taken under majority. |
id |
UCB-6_e1278057b0d395cd9a3c49a3a2de45f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/1456 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB-6 |
network_name_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Constitutional Economics and Public ChoiceEconomia Constitucional e Public Choice: a tendência estatal à expansão fiscal e seus limites institucionais DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p116-127Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem. Majoritarian rules. Public finance expansion. Public goods. Finance laws.Teorema da impossibilidade geral de Arrow. Regras majoritárias. Expansão fiscal estatal. Bens públicos. Leis fiscais.From the Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem indicating the instability of the majoritarian rules, the theoreticians of Constitutional Economics/Public Choice extend the consequences of this theorem pointing as the decisions politics under majority leading the public sector to become enlarged beyond the constitutional limits fixed for it. The solutions proposed for this expansion must be placed in the proper Constitution, limiting and defining the permissible alternatives to the decisions taken under majority. A partir da prova formal relativa à instabilidade das soluções obtidas por meio das regras majoritárias proporcionada pelo teorema da impossibilidade geral de Arrow, os teóricos da Economia Constitucional/Public Choice estendem as conseqüências desse teorema apontando como as decisões políticas sob maioria impactam negativamente na atividade fiscal do Estado levando o setor público a expandir-se para além dos limites fixados constitucionalmente para ele e drenando recursos do setor privado. As soluções propostas para esse inchaço estatal devem estar previstas e figurar na própria Constituição por meio da limitação e definição exógena do conjunto oportunidade referente às decisões tomadas sob maioria.Universidade Católica de Brasília2010-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Pares; Peer ReviewedAnálise de Fundamentosapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/145610.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p116-127Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 116-127Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 116-127Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2010): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 116-1272178-0587reponame:Economic Analysis of law Reviewinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBporengspahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1109https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1925https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1926Leister, Carolinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-06-24T16:38:03Zoai:ojs.portalrevistas.ucb.br:article/1456Revistahttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/ealrONGhttps://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/oaieditor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com2178-05872178-0587opendoar:2022-06-24T16:38:03Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice Economia Constitucional e Public Choice: a tendência estatal à expansão fiscal e seus limites institucionais DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p116-127 |
title |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
spellingShingle |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice Leister, Carolina Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem. Majoritarian rules. Public finance expansion. Public goods. Finance laws. Teorema da impossibilidade geral de Arrow. Regras majoritárias. Expansão fiscal estatal. Bens públicos. Leis fiscais. |
title_short |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
title_full |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
title_fullStr |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
title_sort |
Constitutional Economics and Public Choice |
author |
Leister, Carolina |
author_facet |
Leister, Carolina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leister, Carolina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem. Majoritarian rules. Public finance expansion. Public goods. Finance laws. Teorema da impossibilidade geral de Arrow. Regras majoritárias. Expansão fiscal estatal. Bens públicos. Leis fiscais. |
topic |
Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem. Majoritarian rules. Public finance expansion. Public goods. Finance laws. Teorema da impossibilidade geral de Arrow. Regras majoritárias. Expansão fiscal estatal. Bens públicos. Leis fiscais. |
description |
From the Arrow's General Impossibility Theorem indicating the instability of the majoritarian rules, the theoreticians of Constitutional Economics/Public Choice extend the consequences of this theorem pointing as the decisions politics under majority leading the public sector to become enlarged beyond the constitutional limits fixed for it. The solutions proposed for this expansion must be placed in the proper Constitution, limiting and defining the permissible alternatives to the decisions taken under majority. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-06-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares; Peer Reviewed Análise de Fundamentos |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456 10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p116-127 |
url |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n1p116-127 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng spa |
language |
por eng spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1109 https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1925 https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/article/view/1456/1926 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica de Brasília |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 116-127 Economic Analysis of Law Review ; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2010): EALR's First Issue.; 116-127 Economic Analysis of Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2010): Economic Analysis of Law Review; 116-127 2178-0587 reponame:Economic Analysis of law Review instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
collection |
Economic Analysis of law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Economic Analysis of law Review - Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editor.ealr@gmail.com||sdi@ucb.br||benjaminm.tabak@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798675421197238272 |