Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Faria, Priscila Teixeira de
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2736
Resumo: The research aims to discuss and demonstrate the insufficiency of procedural techniques designed from the individualistic perspective of the civil process to solve problems that orbit the sphere of bureaucratic structures underlying the proper realization of fundamental rights and their related public policies. The recognition of this new social and legal reality gave rise to the need to study so-called structural disputes, which require adequate procedural techniques for their reality and particularities, in order to ensure the provision of effective judicial protection of rights. From the observation of the reality of the demands involving the right to health, whose judicialization is still a phenomenon that is still on the rise, there was a picture of inadequacy in the jurisdictional solutions obtained, either in the space of ordinary jurisdiction or in the context of constitutional jurisdiction, in reason, mainly, of the fact that the processing of these demands occur in the core of individual processes, which follow a different logic. It was noted that the individual demands involving the right to health, which were increasingly judicialized, were not receiving a satisfactory response from the ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction, since the judgment of actions that discuss essentially collective law using bipolar and individualistic procedural instruments did not result in improvement. Therefore, the methodological choice for the concrete case study is therefore effective.
id UCB_621b98946621def01f377d6fb630b65f
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2736
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Pereira, Paula Pessoahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5858811334421706http://lattes.cnpq.br/2624984380407537Faria, Priscila Teixeira de2020-04-06T20:46:24Z2019-12-13FARIA, Priscila Teixeira de. Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??. 2019. 130 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2736The research aims to discuss and demonstrate the insufficiency of procedural techniques designed from the individualistic perspective of the civil process to solve problems that orbit the sphere of bureaucratic structures underlying the proper realization of fundamental rights and their related public policies. The recognition of this new social and legal reality gave rise to the need to study so-called structural disputes, which require adequate procedural techniques for their reality and particularities, in order to ensure the provision of effective judicial protection of rights. From the observation of the reality of the demands involving the right to health, whose judicialization is still a phenomenon that is still on the rise, there was a picture of inadequacy in the jurisdictional solutions obtained, either in the space of ordinary jurisdiction or in the context of constitutional jurisdiction, in reason, mainly, of the fact that the processing of these demands occur in the core of individual processes, which follow a different logic. It was noted that the individual demands involving the right to health, which were increasingly judicialized, were not receiving a satisfactory response from the ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction, since the judgment of actions that discuss essentially collective law using bipolar and individualistic procedural instruments did not result in improvement. Therefore, the methodological choice for the concrete case study is therefore effective.A pesquisa tem por objetivo discutir e demonstrar a insufici??ncia das t??cnicas processuais desenhadas a partir da perspectiva individualista do processo civil para a resolu????o de problemas que orbitam a esfera de estruturas burocr??ticas subjacentes ?? adequada realiza????o dos direitos fundamentais e suas pol??ticas p??blicas correlatas. O reconhecimento desta nova realidade social e jur??dica ensejou a necessidade de se estudar os denominados lit??gios estruturais os quais requerem t??cnicas processuais adequadas para sua realidade e particularidades, com o objetivo de assegurar a presta????o de uma tutela jurisdicional efetiva dos direitos. A partir da observa????o da realidade das demandas que envolvem o direito ?? sa??de, cuja judicializa????o ?? um fen??meno ainda em ascens??o, verificou-se um quadro de inadequa????o das solu????es jurisdicionais obtidas, seja no espa??o da jurisdi????o ordin??ria seja no contexto da jurisdi????o constitucional, em raz??o, principalmente, do fato do processamento dessa demandas ocorrerem no bojo de processos individuais, que seguem uma l??gica diferenciada. Notou-se que as demandas individuais que envolviam o direito ?? sa??de, cada vez mais judicializadas, n??o estavam recebendo resposta satisfat??ria da jurisdi????o ordin??ria e constitucional, pois o julgamento de a????es que discutem direito essencialmente coletivo usando instrumentos processuais bipolares e individualista n??o resultavam na melhoria efetiva do sistema, por isso, a escolha metodol??gica pelo estudo de caso concreto.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2020-04-06T20:46:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1433290 bytes, checksum: 3f2649b86ccfc22b6e2c77e53ab57c49 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2020-04-06T20:46:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1433290 bytes, checksum: 3f2649b86ccfc22b6e2c77e53ab57c49 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2020-04-06T20:46:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf: 1433290 bytes, checksum: 3f2649b86ccfc22b6e2c77e53ab57c49 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-12-13application/pdfhttps://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/retrieve/7130/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Stricto Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidades, Neg??cios e DireitoDireito ?? sa??deLit??gios estruturaisStructural injunctionsRight to healthCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOLit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBTHUMBNAILPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5656https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/4/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpge3b269f2d4e945a576b44997f619a64eMD54TEXTPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.txtPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.txttext/plain334403https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/3/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.txtcdea5a6094a5fd86aae05097de1315d1MD53LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81905https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/1/license.txt75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7MD51ORIGINALPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdfPriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdfapplication/pdf1433290https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/2/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf3f2649b86ccfc22b6e2c77e53ab57c49MD52tede/27362020-07-07 16:00:51.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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
title Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
spellingShingle Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
Faria, Priscila Teixeira de
Direito ?? sa??de
Lit??gios estruturais
Structural injunctions
Right to health
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
title_full Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
title_fullStr Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
title_full_unstemmed Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
title_sort Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??
author Faria, Priscila Teixeira de
author_facet Faria, Priscila Teixeira de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Pereira, Paula Pessoa
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5858811334421706
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2624984380407537
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Faria, Priscila Teixeira de
contributor_str_mv Pereira, Paula Pessoa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Direito ?? sa??de
Lit??gios estruturais
topic Direito ?? sa??de
Lit??gios estruturais
Structural injunctions
Right to health
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Structural injunctions
Right to health
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv The research aims to discuss and demonstrate the insufficiency of procedural techniques designed from the individualistic perspective of the civil process to solve problems that orbit the sphere of bureaucratic structures underlying the proper realization of fundamental rights and their related public policies. The recognition of this new social and legal reality gave rise to the need to study so-called structural disputes, which require adequate procedural techniques for their reality and particularities, in order to ensure the provision of effective judicial protection of rights. From the observation of the reality of the demands involving the right to health, whose judicialization is still a phenomenon that is still on the rise, there was a picture of inadequacy in the jurisdictional solutions obtained, either in the space of ordinary jurisdiction or in the context of constitutional jurisdiction, in reason, mainly, of the fact that the processing of these demands occur in the core of individual processes, which follow a different logic. It was noted that the individual demands involving the right to health, which were increasingly judicialized, were not receiving a satisfactory response from the ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction, since the judgment of actions that discuss essentially collective law using bipolar and individualistic procedural instruments did not result in improvement. Therefore, the methodological choice for the concrete case study is therefore effective.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv A pesquisa tem por objetivo discutir e demonstrar a insufici??ncia das t??cnicas processuais desenhadas a partir da perspectiva individualista do processo civil para a resolu????o de problemas que orbitam a esfera de estruturas burocr??ticas subjacentes ?? adequada realiza????o dos direitos fundamentais e suas pol??ticas p??blicas correlatas. O reconhecimento desta nova realidade social e jur??dica ensejou a necessidade de se estudar os denominados lit??gios estruturais os quais requerem t??cnicas processuais adequadas para sua realidade e particularidades, com o objetivo de assegurar a presta????o de uma tutela jurisdicional efetiva dos direitos. A partir da observa????o da realidade das demandas que envolvem o direito ?? sa??de, cuja judicializa????o ?? um fen??meno ainda em ascens??o, verificou-se um quadro de inadequa????o das solu????es jurisdicionais obtidas, seja no espa??o da jurisdi????o ordin??ria seja no contexto da jurisdi????o constitucional, em raz??o, principalmente, do fato do processamento dessa demandas ocorrerem no bojo de processos individuais, que seguem uma l??gica diferenciada. Notou-se que as demandas individuais que envolviam o direito ?? sa??de, cada vez mais judicializadas, n??o estavam recebendo resposta satisfat??ria da jurisdi????o ordin??ria e constitucional, pois o julgamento de a????es que discutem direito essencialmente coletivo usando instrumentos processuais bipolares e individualista n??o resultavam na melhoria efetiva do sistema, por isso, a escolha metodol??gica pelo estudo de caso concreto.
description The research aims to discuss and demonstrate the insufficiency of procedural techniques designed from the individualistic perspective of the civil process to solve problems that orbit the sphere of bureaucratic structures underlying the proper realization of fundamental rights and their related public policies. The recognition of this new social and legal reality gave rise to the need to study so-called structural disputes, which require adequate procedural techniques for their reality and particularities, in order to ensure the provision of effective judicial protection of rights. From the observation of the reality of the demands involving the right to health, whose judicialization is still a phenomenon that is still on the rise, there was a picture of inadequacy in the jurisdictional solutions obtained, either in the space of ordinary jurisdiction or in the context of constitutional jurisdiction, in reason, mainly, of the fact that the processing of these demands occur in the core of individual processes, which follow a different logic. It was noted that the individual demands involving the right to health, which were increasingly judicialized, were not receiving a satisfactory response from the ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction, since the judgment of actions that discuss essentially collective law using bipolar and individualistic procedural instruments did not result in improvement. Therefore, the methodological choice for the concrete case study is therefore effective.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-12-13
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2020-04-06T20:46:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FARIA, Priscila Teixeira de. Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??. 2019. 130 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2736
identifier_str_mv FARIA, Priscila Teixeira de. Lit??gios estruturais e o direito ?? sa??de: o caso da fila das cirurgias ortop??dicas de alta complexidade do Estado do Cear??. 2019. 130 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2736
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Humanidades, Neg??cios e Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/4/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.jpg
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/3/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/1/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2736/2/PriscilaTeixeiradeFariaDissertacao2019.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e3b269f2d4e945a576b44997f619a64e
cdea5a6094a5fd86aae05097de1315d1
75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7
3f2649b86ccfc22b6e2c77e53ab57c49
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829781062582272