Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
Texto Completo: | https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2535 |
Resumo: | This research is aimed at discussing the role of the Public Prosecution for the proper treatment of structural litigation. The theoretical framework is the access to Justice Movement, understood as the right and fundamental guarantee of access to all legitimate means - jurisdictional and extra-jurisdictional - of protection and of rights implementation. Structural litigation is related to constitutional values which have not been consolidated, and demands, for its solution, the reform of bureaucratic and social structures through the creation or correction of public policies. The study points out some problems faced by adjudication to present effective responses to this kind of complex and multipolar conflicts. Consensual methods of dispute resolution are presented as important instruments to contribute to the production of effective results for structural change. The hypothesis defended is that the Public Prosecution, in view of its role as a guarantee of access to Justice and as a social transformation agent in order to consolidate the founding values of the democratic State of law, has the essential requirements to act as the protagonist in obtaining consensus for the extra-jurisdictional solution of the structural litigation. However the resolutive adjustment must be lead by parameters, extracted from the constitution, that promote the legitimacy and effectiveness of the consensual solution. In the conclusion of this research some measures are proposed in order to enhance the organic and functional management of the Public Prosecution, for the treatment of complex situations, such as structural conflicts. |
id |
UCB_34cbb16340ecac5ebaf51603553e3b0a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2535 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
spelling |
Paes, Jos?? Eduardo Sabohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0616115870965757http://lattes.cnpq.br/1220270433134767Daher, Lenna Luciana Nunes2019-05-17T13:00:45Z2019-10-16DAHER, Lenna Luciana Nunes. Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais. 2019. 155 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2535This research is aimed at discussing the role of the Public Prosecution for the proper treatment of structural litigation. The theoretical framework is the access to Justice Movement, understood as the right and fundamental guarantee of access to all legitimate means - jurisdictional and extra-jurisdictional - of protection and of rights implementation. Structural litigation is related to constitutional values which have not been consolidated, and demands, for its solution, the reform of bureaucratic and social structures through the creation or correction of public policies. The study points out some problems faced by adjudication to present effective responses to this kind of complex and multipolar conflicts. Consensual methods of dispute resolution are presented as important instruments to contribute to the production of effective results for structural change. The hypothesis defended is that the Public Prosecution, in view of its role as a guarantee of access to Justice and as a social transformation agent in order to consolidate the founding values of the democratic State of law, has the essential requirements to act as the protagonist in obtaining consensus for the extra-jurisdictional solution of the structural litigation. However the resolutive adjustment must be lead by parameters, extracted from the constitution, that promote the legitimacy and effectiveness of the consensual solution. In the conclusion of this research some measures are proposed in order to enhance the organic and functional management of the Public Prosecution, for the treatment of complex situations, such as structural conflicts.Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo discutir o papel do Minist??rio P??blico para o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais. Constitui marco te??rico o movimento de acesso ?? Justi??a, compreendido como direito e garantia fundamental de acesso a todos os meios leg??timos ??? jurisdicionais e extrajurisdicionais ??? de prote????o e de efetiva????o de direitos. Os lit??gios estruturais s??o conflitos coletivos que se relacionam a um valor constitucional n??o concretizado, e demandam, para sua solu????o, a reforma de estruturas burocr??ticas e sociais, mediante a implementa????o ou a corre????o de pol??ticas p??blicas. A pesquisa aponta alguns problemas enfrentados pela tutela jurisdicional por adjudica????o para apresentar respostas efetivas a essa esp??cie de conflitos complexos e multipolares. Apresentam-se os m??todos autocompositivos como recursos importantes para contribuir com a produ????o de resultados efetivos para a mudan??a estrutural. A hip??tese defendida ?? que o Minist??rio P??blico, em raz??o do seu papel de garantia de acesso ?? Justi??a e de agente de transforma????o social para a concretiza????o dos valores fundantes do Estado democr??tico de direito, ostenta os requisitos necess??rios para atuar como protagonista na obten????o de consensos para a solu????o extrajurisdicional dos lit??gios estruturais. Deve orientar sua atua????o resolutiva, entretanto, por par??metros, extra??dos da conforma????o constitucional da institui????o, que promovam a legitimidade e a efetividade da solu????o consensual. Como resultado da pesquisa, prop??em-se algumas medidas para o aprimoramento da gest??o org??nica e funcional do Minist??rio P??blico, para o tratamento de situa????es complexas, como os conflitos estruturais.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2019-05-17T13:00:27Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf: 1607232 bytes, checksum: da04e650bea978afbeaca57104a36e23 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2019-05-17T13:00:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf: 1607232 bytes, checksum: da04e650bea978afbeaca57104a36e23 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-05-17T13:00:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf: 1607232 bytes, checksum: da04e650bea978afbeaca57104a36e23 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-10-16application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/6316/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Stricto Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoNegocia????oAutocomposi????oMinist??rio P??blicoLit??gios estruturaisPar??metros institucionaisAlternative dispute resolutionInstitutional parametersStructural litigationPublic ProsecutionCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOMinist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81905https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/1/license.txt75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7MD51ORIGINALLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdfLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdfapplication/pdf1607232https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/2/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdfda04e650bea978afbeaca57104a36e23MD52TEXTLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.txtLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.txttext/plain435125https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/3/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.txt0017b13be3cde3139b470fecd04d6218MD53THUMBNAILLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgLennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5073https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/4/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgec5e7057fba06dca822e721cf6f9d84cMD54tede/25352019-05-18 01:07:39.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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/ |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
title |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
spellingShingle |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais Daher, Lenna Luciana Nunes Negocia????o Autocomposi????o Minist??rio P??blico Lit??gios estruturais Par??metros institucionais Alternative dispute resolution Institutional parameters Structural litigation Public Prosecution CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
title_full |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
title_fullStr |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
title_sort |
Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais |
author |
Daher, Lenna Luciana Nunes |
author_facet |
Daher, Lenna Luciana Nunes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Paes, Jos?? Eduardo Sabo |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0616115870965757 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1220270433134767 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Daher, Lenna Luciana Nunes |
contributor_str_mv |
Paes, Jos?? Eduardo Sabo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Negocia????o Autocomposi????o Minist??rio P??blico Lit??gios estruturais Par??metros institucionais |
topic |
Negocia????o Autocomposi????o Minist??rio P??blico Lit??gios estruturais Par??metros institucionais Alternative dispute resolution Institutional parameters Structural litigation Public Prosecution CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Alternative dispute resolution Institutional parameters Structural litigation Public Prosecution |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
This research is aimed at discussing the role of the Public Prosecution for the proper treatment of structural litigation. The theoretical framework is the access to Justice Movement, understood as the right and fundamental guarantee of access to all legitimate means - jurisdictional and extra-jurisdictional - of protection and of rights implementation. Structural litigation is related to constitutional values which have not been consolidated, and demands, for its solution, the reform of bureaucratic and social structures through the creation or correction of public policies. The study points out some problems faced by adjudication to present effective responses to this kind of complex and multipolar conflicts. Consensual methods of dispute resolution are presented as important instruments to contribute to the production of effective results for structural change. The hypothesis defended is that the Public Prosecution, in view of its role as a guarantee of access to Justice and as a social transformation agent in order to consolidate the founding values of the democratic State of law, has the essential requirements to act as the protagonist in obtaining consensus for the extra-jurisdictional solution of the structural litigation. However the resolutive adjustment must be lead by parameters, extracted from the constitution, that promote the legitimacy and effectiveness of the consensual solution. In the conclusion of this research some measures are proposed in order to enhance the organic and functional management of the Public Prosecution, for the treatment of complex situations, such as structural conflicts. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo discutir o papel do Minist??rio P??blico para o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais. Constitui marco te??rico o movimento de acesso ?? Justi??a, compreendido como direito e garantia fundamental de acesso a todos os meios leg??timos ??? jurisdicionais e extrajurisdicionais ??? de prote????o e de efetiva????o de direitos. Os lit??gios estruturais s??o conflitos coletivos que se relacionam a um valor constitucional n??o concretizado, e demandam, para sua solu????o, a reforma de estruturas burocr??ticas e sociais, mediante a implementa????o ou a corre????o de pol??ticas p??blicas. A pesquisa aponta alguns problemas enfrentados pela tutela jurisdicional por adjudica????o para apresentar respostas efetivas a essa esp??cie de conflitos complexos e multipolares. Apresentam-se os m??todos autocompositivos como recursos importantes para contribuir com a produ????o de resultados efetivos para a mudan??a estrutural. A hip??tese defendida ?? que o Minist??rio P??blico, em raz??o do seu papel de garantia de acesso ?? Justi??a e de agente de transforma????o social para a concretiza????o dos valores fundantes do Estado democr??tico de direito, ostenta os requisitos necess??rios para atuar como protagonista na obten????o de consensos para a solu????o extrajurisdicional dos lit??gios estruturais. Deve orientar sua atua????o resolutiva, entretanto, por par??metros, extra??dos da conforma????o constitucional da institui????o, que promovam a legitimidade e a efetividade da solu????o consensual. Como resultado da pesquisa, prop??em-se algumas medidas para o aprimoramento da gest??o org??nica e funcional do Minist??rio P??blico, para o tratamento de situa????es complexas, como os conflitos estruturais. |
description |
This research is aimed at discussing the role of the Public Prosecution for the proper treatment of structural litigation. The theoretical framework is the access to Justice Movement, understood as the right and fundamental guarantee of access to all legitimate means - jurisdictional and extra-jurisdictional - of protection and of rights implementation. Structural litigation is related to constitutional values which have not been consolidated, and demands, for its solution, the reform of bureaucratic and social structures through the creation or correction of public policies. The study points out some problems faced by adjudication to present effective responses to this kind of complex and multipolar conflicts. Consensual methods of dispute resolution are presented as important instruments to contribute to the production of effective results for structural change. The hypothesis defended is that the Public Prosecution, in view of its role as a guarantee of access to Justice and as a social transformation agent in order to consolidate the founding values of the democratic State of law, has the essential requirements to act as the protagonist in obtaining consensus for the extra-jurisdictional solution of the structural litigation. However the resolutive adjustment must be lead by parameters, extracted from the constitution, that promote the legitimacy and effectiveness of the consensual solution. In the conclusion of this research some measures are proposed in order to enhance the organic and functional management of the Public Prosecution, for the treatment of complex situations, such as structural conflicts. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-05-17T13:00:45Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
DAHER, Lenna Luciana Nunes. Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais. 2019. 155 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2535 |
identifier_str_mv |
DAHER, Lenna Luciana Nunes. Minist??rio P??blico resolutivo e o tratamento adequado dos lit??gios estruturais. 2019. 155 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2019. |
url |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2535 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UCB |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/1/license.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/2/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/3/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2535/4/LennaLucianaNunesDaherDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
75558dcf859532757239878b42f1c2c7 da04e650bea978afbeaca57104a36e23 0017b13be3cde3139b470fecd04d6218 ec5e7057fba06dca822e721cf6f9d84c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1724829779288391680 |