O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
Texto Completo: | https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2492 |
Resumo: | The Principle of Equality should be used in all situations involving legal relationships. With the advent of Law no. 9249/95, and consequently with the possibility of extinguishing punishment of authors of crimes against the tax order, after the effective payment of the helpless taxes, some controversies arose regarding the coercive effectiveness of Criminal Law. However, it is observed a differentiated treatment of non-taxable offenders, hence the importance of analyzing the instituting of punishment and acquittals in another perspective. Given that the Brazilian prison population is large, mainly due to practices of crimes against the patrimony, it is searched with the present work, to analyze the fact of the equal application of the benefit given to the authors of the crimes against the tax order, also to the authors of other crimes, who may repent of the criminal practice, restoring the injured object or, in its impossibility, repairing, in a certain way, the damage caused. Equal treatment is proposed between offenders, observing the possibility of extinguishing punishment, with an eye towards reducing new criminal practices, as well as reducing the prison population, generating a possibility of saving for the state, since it will not be obliged to costing the maintenance of the prisoners, a benefit for the victim, since they will be compensated for the damage caused by the practice of the crime, and a possibility of a second chance for the perpetrator, who will not be incarcerated. The analysis was based on bibliographical research, having as sources the doctrine, technical productions and jurisprudences. At first, the importance of taxes was analyzed for the maintenance of state activities, conceptualizing and extracting the purpose of the taxes, in order to understand the need to classify crimes against the tax order, and consequent application of a penalty to the offender. In a second moment, it is sought to understand the beneficent institutes of the Later Regret (Later Repentance) and the Acquittal Excuse (Excusive Absence). And then, the possibility of equal treatment and possible benefits, with the application of the abovementioned institutes, against the State, the victim and the aggressor was evaluated. |
id |
UCB_689324b6ddd5c1fd3600bb440cb3cd31 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2492 |
network_acronym_str |
UCB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
spelling |
Falc??o, Maurin Almeidahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0316639131623918http://lattes.cnpq.br/9370498313066841Ramos, Orlando Mauriz2018-11-13T15:56:26Z2018-09-15RAMOS, Orlando Mauriz. O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria. 2018. 85 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2492The Principle of Equality should be used in all situations involving legal relationships. With the advent of Law no. 9249/95, and consequently with the possibility of extinguishing punishment of authors of crimes against the tax order, after the effective payment of the helpless taxes, some controversies arose regarding the coercive effectiveness of Criminal Law. However, it is observed a differentiated treatment of non-taxable offenders, hence the importance of analyzing the instituting of punishment and acquittals in another perspective. Given that the Brazilian prison population is large, mainly due to practices of crimes against the patrimony, it is searched with the present work, to analyze the fact of the equal application of the benefit given to the authors of the crimes against the tax order, also to the authors of other crimes, who may repent of the criminal practice, restoring the injured object or, in its impossibility, repairing, in a certain way, the damage caused. Equal treatment is proposed between offenders, observing the possibility of extinguishing punishment, with an eye towards reducing new criminal practices, as well as reducing the prison population, generating a possibility of saving for the state, since it will not be obliged to costing the maintenance of the prisoners, a benefit for the victim, since they will be compensated for the damage caused by the practice of the crime, and a possibility of a second chance for the perpetrator, who will not be incarcerated. The analysis was based on bibliographical research, having as sources the doctrine, technical productions and jurisprudences. At first, the importance of taxes was analyzed for the maintenance of state activities, conceptualizing and extracting the purpose of the taxes, in order to understand the need to classify crimes against the tax order, and consequent application of a penalty to the offender. In a second moment, it is sought to understand the beneficent institutes of the Later Regret (Later Repentance) and the Acquittal Excuse (Excusive Absence). And then, the possibility of equal treatment and possible benefits, with the application of the abovementioned institutes, against the State, the victim and the aggressor was evaluated.O Princ??pio da Igualdade dever?? ser utilizado em todas as situa????es que envolvam rela????es jur??dicas. Com o advento da Lei n??9.249/95, e, consequentemente, com a possibilidade da extin????o de punibilidade aos autores de crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, ap??s o efetivo pagamento dos tributos sonegados, surgiram algumas controv??rsias no tocante ?? efic??cia coercitiva do Direito Penal. Contudo, observa-se um tratamento diferenciado para com os autores de infra????es que n??o tenham cunho tribut??rio, da?? a import??ncia da an??lise dos institutos da extin????o de punibilidade e das escusas absolut??rias, numa outra ??tica. Dado que a popula????o carcer??ria brasileira encontra-se vultuosa, principalmente devido a pr??ticas de crimes contra o patrim??nio, busca-se com o presente trabalho, analisar o fato da aplica????o equiparada do benef??cio dado aos autores dos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, tamb??m aos autores de outros crimes, que porventura venham a se arrepender da pr??tica delituosa, restituindo o objeto lesado, ou, na sua impossibilidade, reparando, de certa forma, o dano causado. Prop??em-se um tratamento igualit??rio entre os infratores, observando a possibilidade da extin????o da punibilidade, com olhos voltados ?? redu????o de novas pr??ticas delituosas, bem como na diminui????o da popula????o carcer??ria, gerando uma possibilidade de economia para o estado, pois n??o ser?? obrigado a custear a manuten????o dos presos, um benef??cio para a v??tima, vez que ser?? ressarcida do preju??zo causado pela pr??tica do crime, e uma possibilidade de segunda chance para o autor, que n??o ser?? encarcerado. A an??lise se fundamentou em pesquisas bibliogr??ficas, tendo como fontes a doutrina, produ????es t??cnicas e jurisprud??ncias. Num primeiro momento foi analisado a import??ncia dos tributos para a manuten????o das atividades estatais, conceituando e extraindo a finalidade dos tributos, para se entender a necessidade da tipifica????o de crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, e consequente aplica????o de uma pena ao infrator. Num segundo momento busca-se entender os institutos ben??ficos do Arrependimento Posterior e da Escusa Absolut??ria. E em seguida foi avaliado a possibilidade do tratamento igualit??rio e eventuais benef??cios, com a aplica????o dos institutos acima mencionados, frente o Estado, a v??tima e o agressor.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-11-09T17:57:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf: 901886 bytes, checksum: 651204f0a4fd8e26d90341f87258fac2 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-11-13T15:56:26Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf: 901886 bytes, checksum: 651204f0a4fd8e26d90341f87258fac2 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-13T15:56:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf: 901886 bytes, checksum: 651204f0a4fd8e26d90341f87258fac2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-09-15application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/6048/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Stricto Sensu em DireitoUCBBrasilEscola de Humanidade e DireitoPrinc??pio da igualdadeCrimes contra a ordem tribut??riaArrependimento posteriorEscusa absolut??ria.Principle of equalityCrimes against the tributal orderLater regret (Later repentance)Acquittal excuse (Excusive absence)CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOO princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??riainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81831https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/1/license.txtd7d5e5ec75089f122abe937645a56120MD51ORIGINALOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdfOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdfapplication/pdf901886https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/2/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf651204f0a4fd8e26d90341f87258fac2MD52TEXTOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.txtOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.txttext/plain194467https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/3/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.txt04332fe5f9773d712299b68b448e68ecMD53THUMBNAILOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgOrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5807https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/4/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg48b1a131b99113089ee351bb54028cb8MD54tede/24922018-11-14 01:10:04.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/ |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
title |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
spellingShingle |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria Ramos, Orlando Mauriz Princ??pio da igualdade Crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria Arrependimento posterior Escusa absolut??ria. Principle of equality Crimes against the tributal order Later regret (Later repentance) Acquittal excuse (Excusive absence) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
title_full |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
title_fullStr |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
title_full_unstemmed |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
title_sort |
O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria |
author |
Ramos, Orlando Mauriz |
author_facet |
Ramos, Orlando Mauriz |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Falc??o, Maurin Almeida |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0316639131623918 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9370498313066841 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Orlando Mauriz |
contributor_str_mv |
Falc??o, Maurin Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Princ??pio da igualdade Crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria Arrependimento posterior Escusa absolut??ria. |
topic |
Princ??pio da igualdade Crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria Arrependimento posterior Escusa absolut??ria. Principle of equality Crimes against the tributal order Later regret (Later repentance) Acquittal excuse (Excusive absence) CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Principle of equality Crimes against the tributal order Later regret (Later repentance) Acquittal excuse (Excusive absence) |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv |
The Principle of Equality should be used in all situations involving legal relationships. With the advent of Law no. 9249/95, and consequently with the possibility of extinguishing punishment of authors of crimes against the tax order, after the effective payment of the helpless taxes, some controversies arose regarding the coercive effectiveness of Criminal Law. However, it is observed a differentiated treatment of non-taxable offenders, hence the importance of analyzing the instituting of punishment and acquittals in another perspective. Given that the Brazilian prison population is large, mainly due to practices of crimes against the patrimony, it is searched with the present work, to analyze the fact of the equal application of the benefit given to the authors of the crimes against the tax order, also to the authors of other crimes, who may repent of the criminal practice, restoring the injured object or, in its impossibility, repairing, in a certain way, the damage caused. Equal treatment is proposed between offenders, observing the possibility of extinguishing punishment, with an eye towards reducing new criminal practices, as well as reducing the prison population, generating a possibility of saving for the state, since it will not be obliged to costing the maintenance of the prisoners, a benefit for the victim, since they will be compensated for the damage caused by the practice of the crime, and a possibility of a second chance for the perpetrator, who will not be incarcerated. The analysis was based on bibliographical research, having as sources the doctrine, technical productions and jurisprudences. At first, the importance of taxes was analyzed for the maintenance of state activities, conceptualizing and extracting the purpose of the taxes, in order to understand the need to classify crimes against the tax order, and consequent application of a penalty to the offender. In a second moment, it is sought to understand the beneficent institutes of the Later Regret (Later Repentance) and the Acquittal Excuse (Excusive Absence). And then, the possibility of equal treatment and possible benefits, with the application of the abovementioned institutes, against the State, the victim and the aggressor was evaluated. |
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv |
O Princ??pio da Igualdade dever?? ser utilizado em todas as situa????es que envolvam rela????es jur??dicas. Com o advento da Lei n??9.249/95, e, consequentemente, com a possibilidade da extin????o de punibilidade aos autores de crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, ap??s o efetivo pagamento dos tributos sonegados, surgiram algumas controv??rsias no tocante ?? efic??cia coercitiva do Direito Penal. Contudo, observa-se um tratamento diferenciado para com os autores de infra????es que n??o tenham cunho tribut??rio, da?? a import??ncia da an??lise dos institutos da extin????o de punibilidade e das escusas absolut??rias, numa outra ??tica. Dado que a popula????o carcer??ria brasileira encontra-se vultuosa, principalmente devido a pr??ticas de crimes contra o patrim??nio, busca-se com o presente trabalho, analisar o fato da aplica????o equiparada do benef??cio dado aos autores dos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, tamb??m aos autores de outros crimes, que porventura venham a se arrepender da pr??tica delituosa, restituindo o objeto lesado, ou, na sua impossibilidade, reparando, de certa forma, o dano causado. Prop??em-se um tratamento igualit??rio entre os infratores, observando a possibilidade da extin????o da punibilidade, com olhos voltados ?? redu????o de novas pr??ticas delituosas, bem como na diminui????o da popula????o carcer??ria, gerando uma possibilidade de economia para o estado, pois n??o ser?? obrigado a custear a manuten????o dos presos, um benef??cio para a v??tima, vez que ser?? ressarcida do preju??zo causado pela pr??tica do crime, e uma possibilidade de segunda chance para o autor, que n??o ser?? encarcerado. A an??lise se fundamentou em pesquisas bibliogr??ficas, tendo como fontes a doutrina, produ????es t??cnicas e jurisprud??ncias. Num primeiro momento foi analisado a import??ncia dos tributos para a manuten????o das atividades estatais, conceituando e extraindo a finalidade dos tributos, para se entender a necessidade da tipifica????o de crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria, e consequente aplica????o de uma pena ao infrator. Num segundo momento busca-se entender os institutos ben??ficos do Arrependimento Posterior e da Escusa Absolut??ria. E em seguida foi avaliado a possibilidade do tratamento igualit??rio e eventuais benef??cios, com a aplica????o dos institutos acima mencionados, frente o Estado, a v??tima e o agressor. |
description |
The Principle of Equality should be used in all situations involving legal relationships. With the advent of Law no. 9249/95, and consequently with the possibility of extinguishing punishment of authors of crimes against the tax order, after the effective payment of the helpless taxes, some controversies arose regarding the coercive effectiveness of Criminal Law. However, it is observed a differentiated treatment of non-taxable offenders, hence the importance of analyzing the instituting of punishment and acquittals in another perspective. Given that the Brazilian prison population is large, mainly due to practices of crimes against the patrimony, it is searched with the present work, to analyze the fact of the equal application of the benefit given to the authors of the crimes against the tax order, also to the authors of other crimes, who may repent of the criminal practice, restoring the injured object or, in its impossibility, repairing, in a certain way, the damage caused. Equal treatment is proposed between offenders, observing the possibility of extinguishing punishment, with an eye towards reducing new criminal practices, as well as reducing the prison population, generating a possibility of saving for the state, since it will not be obliged to costing the maintenance of the prisoners, a benefit for the victim, since they will be compensated for the damage caused by the practice of the crime, and a possibility of a second chance for the perpetrator, who will not be incarcerated. The analysis was based on bibliographical research, having as sources the doctrine, technical productions and jurisprudences. At first, the importance of taxes was analyzed for the maintenance of state activities, conceptualizing and extracting the purpose of the taxes, in order to understand the need to classify crimes against the tax order, and consequent application of a penalty to the offender. In a second moment, it is sought to understand the beneficent institutes of the Later Regret (Later Repentance) and the Acquittal Excuse (Excusive Absence). And then, the possibility of equal treatment and possible benefits, with the application of the abovementioned institutes, against the State, the victim and the aggressor was evaluated. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-13T15:56:26Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-15 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
format |
masterThesis |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
RAMOS, Orlando Mauriz. O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria. 2018. 85 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2492 |
identifier_str_mv |
RAMOS, Orlando Mauriz. O princ??pio da igualdade e a extin????o de punibilidade nos crimes contra a ordem tribut??ria: o arrependimento posterior como escusa absolut??ria. 2018. 85 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018. |
url |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2492 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa Stricto Sensu em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UCB |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) instacron:UCB |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB) |
instacron_str |
UCB |
institution |
UCB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/1/license.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/2/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/3/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.txt https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2492/4/OrlandoMaurizRamosDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d7d5e5ec75089f122abe937645a56120 651204f0a4fd8e26d90341f87258fac2 04332fe5f9773d712299b68b448e68ec 48b1a131b99113089ee351bb54028cb8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1724829778509299712 |