Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bruno, Hamilton
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
Texto Completo: https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2463
Resumo: The process of determining the worth of a company (valuation) aims to calculate the fair value using several methodologies. Considering that, the value of a company is a result of its potential production; valuation methods should measure the capability to generate future benefits from the company's assets, which may be tangible (machinery, stock, etc.) and intangible (brands, the quality of its administration, strategy, etc.). Intangible assets, besides being more difficult to measure, are fundamental to the organization, contributing to the company's value. Several methods have been identified, making more difficult to choose the method to be used. Thus, the present study sought to analyze the main valuation methods and their applications, both those traditionally used and those that used for intangible assets. It was also observed if the governance of the company and involvement in fraud and corruption are considered during the evaluation. The identification of the practices of using which evaluation methods are most appropriate to each type of organization was elaborated from the data collection through the application of a structured questionnaire with professionals of the area and the evaluation of the results by a discussion group composed by specialists. The research findings can contribute to the choice of methods for evaluating companies, depending on their segment, size and concentration of assets: tangible and intangible. The results of this work demonstrate that, despite the existence of several methods of valuation of companies and intangible, the cash flow discounted method is the most used, but can also be complemented by other methods.
id UCB_a7bf970e651a6c6c0f436c82266be0a5
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2463
network_acronym_str UCB
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
spelling Streit, Rosalvo Ermeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8320780829093601http://lattes.cnpq.br/8025903731827388Bruno, Hamilton2018-09-17T14:58:10Z2018-07-09BRUNO, Hamilton. Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis. 2018. 125 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Gest??o do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informa????o) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018.https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2463The process of determining the worth of a company (valuation) aims to calculate the fair value using several methodologies. Considering that, the value of a company is a result of its potential production; valuation methods should measure the capability to generate future benefits from the company's assets, which may be tangible (machinery, stock, etc.) and intangible (brands, the quality of its administration, strategy, etc.). Intangible assets, besides being more difficult to measure, are fundamental to the organization, contributing to the company's value. Several methods have been identified, making more difficult to choose the method to be used. Thus, the present study sought to analyze the main valuation methods and their applications, both those traditionally used and those that used for intangible assets. It was also observed if the governance of the company and involvement in fraud and corruption are considered during the evaluation. The identification of the practices of using which evaluation methods are most appropriate to each type of organization was elaborated from the data collection through the application of a structured questionnaire with professionals of the area and the evaluation of the results by a discussion group composed by specialists. The research findings can contribute to the choice of methods for evaluating companies, depending on their segment, size and concentration of assets: tangible and intangible. The results of this work demonstrate that, despite the existence of several methods of valuation of companies and intangible, the cash flow discounted method is the most used, but can also be complemented by other methods.O processo de avalia????o de uma empresa (valuation) tem como objetivo calcular o valor justo (fair value), sendo que esse c??lculo pode ser realizado mediante a utiliza????o de diversas metodologias. Considerando que o valor de uma empresa ?? representado pelo o que poder?? produzir, os m??todos de avalia????o devem, em princ??pio, mensurar a capacidade de gera????o de benef??cios futuros, originados dos ativos da empresa, que podem estar sob a forma de ativos tang??veis (im??veis, m??quinas, estoques, etc.) e intang??veis (marcas, a qualidade de sua administra????o, sua estrat??gia, etc.). Os ativos intang??veis al??m de apresentarem maior dificuldade de serem mensurados, possuem import??ncia fundamental na medida em que seu adequado gerenciamento gera vantagens competitivas ?? organiza????o, contribuindo para a alavancagem do valor da empresa. Foram identificados diversos m??todos, o que dificulta a escolha do procedimento a ser empregado. Assim, o presente estudo buscou verificar a aplica????o dos principais m??todos de avalia????o, tanto os tradicionalmente utilizados, como os que tratam de avali????o dos ativos intang??veis. Procurou-se observar se a governan??a da empresa e envolvimento em fraudes e corrup????o s??o consideradas quando da avalia????o. A identifica????o das pr??ticas de utiliza????o de quais m??todos de avalia????o s??o mais adequados a cada tipo de organiza????o foi elaborado a partir da coleta de dados mediante a aplica????o de um question??rio estruturado com profissionais da ??rea e da avalia????o dos resultados por um grupo de discuss??o composto por especialistas. Os achados da pesquisa podem contribuir para a escolha de m??todos para avalia????es de empresas, em fun????o do seu segmento, porte e concentra????o de ativos: tang??veis e intang??veis. Os resultados deste trabalho demonstram que, apesar da exist??ncia de diversos m??todos de avalia????o de empresas e de intang??veis, o m??todo do fluxo de caixa descontado ?? o de maior utiliza????o, podendo, por??m, ser complementado por outros m??todos.Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-09-17T14:57:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf: 3908365 bytes, checksum: 9e0df17bd246aecffba4df5794e8a7ac (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-09-17T14:58:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf: 3908365 bytes, checksum: 9e0df17bd246aecffba4df5794e8a7ac (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-17T14:58:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf: 3908365 bytes, checksum: 9e0df17bd246aecffba4df5794e8a7ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-07-09application/pdfhttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/retrieve/5941/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Cat??lica de Bras??liaPrograma Stricto Sensu em Gest??o do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informa????oUCBBrasilEscola de Educa????o, Tecnologia e Comunica????oValuationAtivos tang??veisAtivos intang??veisAvalia????o de empresasValuation methodsIntangible assetsTangible assetsCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::CIENCIA DA INFORMACAOIdentifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCBinstname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)instacron:UCBLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81831https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/1/license.txtd7d5e5ec75089f122abe937645a56120MD51ORIGINALHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdfHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdfapplication/pdf3908365https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/2/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf9e0df17bd246aecffba4df5794e8a7acMD52TEXTHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.txtHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.txttext/plain221108https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/3/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.txtfcb48b7e55ec549e6a782b622866acb3MD53THUMBNAILHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgHamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5517https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/4/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg306039731f54cc38d1eeebaa91a627d0MD54tede/24632018-09-18 01:08:53.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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
title Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
spellingShingle Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
Bruno, Hamilton
Valuation
Ativos tang??veis
Ativos intang??veis
Avalia????o de empresas
Valuation methods
Intangible assets
Tangible assets
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO
title_short Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
title_full Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
title_fullStr Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
title_full_unstemmed Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
title_sort Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis
author Bruno, Hamilton
author_facet Bruno, Hamilton
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Streit, Rosalvo Ermes
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8320780829093601
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8025903731827388
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bruno, Hamilton
contributor_str_mv Streit, Rosalvo Ermes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Valuation
Ativos tang??veis
Ativos intang??veis
Avalia????o de empresas
Valuation methods
Intangible assets
Tangible assets
topic Valuation
Ativos tang??veis
Ativos intang??veis
Avalia????o de empresas
Valuation methods
Intangible assets
Tangible assets
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO
dc.description.abstract.eng.fl_txt_mv The process of determining the worth of a company (valuation) aims to calculate the fair value using several methodologies. Considering that, the value of a company is a result of its potential production; valuation methods should measure the capability to generate future benefits from the company's assets, which may be tangible (machinery, stock, etc.) and intangible (brands, the quality of its administration, strategy, etc.). Intangible assets, besides being more difficult to measure, are fundamental to the organization, contributing to the company's value. Several methods have been identified, making more difficult to choose the method to be used. Thus, the present study sought to analyze the main valuation methods and their applications, both those traditionally used and those that used for intangible assets. It was also observed if the governance of the company and involvement in fraud and corruption are considered during the evaluation. The identification of the practices of using which evaluation methods are most appropriate to each type of organization was elaborated from the data collection through the application of a structured questionnaire with professionals of the area and the evaluation of the results by a discussion group composed by specialists. The research findings can contribute to the choice of methods for evaluating companies, depending on their segment, size and concentration of assets: tangible and intangible. The results of this work demonstrate that, despite the existence of several methods of valuation of companies and intangible, the cash flow discounted method is the most used, but can also be complemented by other methods.
dc.description.abstract.por.fl_txt_mv O processo de avalia????o de uma empresa (valuation) tem como objetivo calcular o valor justo (fair value), sendo que esse c??lculo pode ser realizado mediante a utiliza????o de diversas metodologias. Considerando que o valor de uma empresa ?? representado pelo o que poder?? produzir, os m??todos de avalia????o devem, em princ??pio, mensurar a capacidade de gera????o de benef??cios futuros, originados dos ativos da empresa, que podem estar sob a forma de ativos tang??veis (im??veis, m??quinas, estoques, etc.) e intang??veis (marcas, a qualidade de sua administra????o, sua estrat??gia, etc.). Os ativos intang??veis al??m de apresentarem maior dificuldade de serem mensurados, possuem import??ncia fundamental na medida em que seu adequado gerenciamento gera vantagens competitivas ?? organiza????o, contribuindo para a alavancagem do valor da empresa. Foram identificados diversos m??todos, o que dificulta a escolha do procedimento a ser empregado. Assim, o presente estudo buscou verificar a aplica????o dos principais m??todos de avalia????o, tanto os tradicionalmente utilizados, como os que tratam de avali????o dos ativos intang??veis. Procurou-se observar se a governan??a da empresa e envolvimento em fraudes e corrup????o s??o consideradas quando da avalia????o. A identifica????o das pr??ticas de utiliza????o de quais m??todos de avalia????o s??o mais adequados a cada tipo de organiza????o foi elaborado a partir da coleta de dados mediante a aplica????o de um question??rio estruturado com profissionais da ??rea e da avalia????o dos resultados por um grupo de discuss??o composto por especialistas. Os achados da pesquisa podem contribuir para a escolha de m??todos para avalia????es de empresas, em fun????o do seu segmento, porte e concentra????o de ativos: tang??veis e intang??veis. Os resultados deste trabalho demonstram que, apesar da exist??ncia de diversos m??todos de avalia????o de empresas e de intang??veis, o m??todo do fluxo de caixa descontado ?? o de maior utiliza????o, podendo, por??m, ser complementado por outros m??todos.
description The process of determining the worth of a company (valuation) aims to calculate the fair value using several methodologies. Considering that, the value of a company is a result of its potential production; valuation methods should measure the capability to generate future benefits from the company's assets, which may be tangible (machinery, stock, etc.) and intangible (brands, the quality of its administration, strategy, etc.). Intangible assets, besides being more difficult to measure, are fundamental to the organization, contributing to the company's value. Several methods have been identified, making more difficult to choose the method to be used. Thus, the present study sought to analyze the main valuation methods and their applications, both those traditionally used and those that used for intangible assets. It was also observed if the governance of the company and involvement in fraud and corruption are considered during the evaluation. The identification of the practices of using which evaluation methods are most appropriate to each type of organization was elaborated from the data collection through the application of a structured questionnaire with professionals of the area and the evaluation of the results by a discussion group composed by specialists. The research findings can contribute to the choice of methods for evaluating companies, depending on their segment, size and concentration of assets: tangible and intangible. The results of this work demonstrate that, despite the existence of several methods of valuation of companies and intangible, the cash flow discounted method is the most used, but can also be complemented by other methods.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-09-17T14:58:10Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-07-09
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
format masterThesis
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv BRUNO, Hamilton. Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis. 2018. 125 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Gest??o do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informa????o) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2463
identifier_str_mv BRUNO, Hamilton. Identifica????o das pr??ticas de avalia????o de empresas com ativos tang??veis e intang??veis. 2018. 125 f. Disserta????o (Programa Stricto Sensu em Gest??o do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informa????o) - Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Bras??lia, 2018.
url https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2463
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Stricto Sensu em Gest??o do Conhecimento e da Tecnologia da Informa????o
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UCB
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Educa????o, Tecnologia e Comunica????o
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron:UCB
instname_str Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB)
instacron_str UCB
institution UCB
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/1/license.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/2/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/3/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.txt
https://200.214.135.178:8443/jspui/bitstream/tede/2463/4/HamiltonBrunoDissertacao2018.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d7d5e5ec75089f122abe937645a56120
9e0df17bd246aecffba4df5794e8a7ac
fcb48b7e55ec549e6a782b622866acb3
306039731f54cc38d1eeebaa91a627d0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1724829778285953024