OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salache, Loide Andréa
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO
Texto Completo: http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/53
Resumo: The theoretical foundations that anchor/support this research are those of discourse analysis, introduced by Michel Pecheux, in the 60s of XX century and structured in Brazil by Eni Orlandi and researchers who work with her. In this disciplinary field , the discourse is the center and only became the material of subjects interpellated by ideology and crossed by the unconscious. Methodologically, not searching for content, but for the way how certain effects are constituted. The discursive object and the cutouts made in the corpus are crucial for the methodological guidance. In this research, the research object is the discourse on language manualized in/of politically correct, meant as one more coercive action that seeks to manage the language. Three articles "opinion makers", belonging to discursive formations that overlap while they differ by the different subject-positions, structure the corpus. Those called by the manual authors of "opinion makers" respond by authory of the three materialities cut, and from those, we cut discursive sequences (SD) to be analyzed in order to answer the following research question: How in discourses about, the manual build up evidences that the language is always heterogeneous, despite the coercive practices? The overall goal around this issue is to understand the discursive function of language in manuals, highlighting the effects of senses beyond its management and its uniformity, seeking to identify the discourses that support this practice. This will encompass the following specific objectives: 1) mapping out government actions, which give visibility to the State Repressive Apparatus (SRA) in relation to language practices, 2) identify the discursive procedures, stablisher of evidence around the imposibility of the language functioning in its heterogeneity and its difficulties in manualisation, 3) highlight the conception of language functioning in materiality cut from the subject-positions occupied by those responsible for discourses about, on manualized language, emphasizing the regularities, the disruptions, the contradictions and discourses that support/anchor this operation. The work is divided into three chapters that are articulated in order to answer the proposed question and meet the objectives of this work. In the first chapter, we prioritized natural historical aspects, seeking to map out government practices that treat coercively the language, and try to manage it. We focus on the operation of the manual through notions that mean "how standardizing the language". In the second chapter, we undertook theories about the language functioning, from the theoretical conception of Discourse Analysis. The third chapter covers the analysis around the discursive sequences cut from the materiality that structure the corpus. We emphasize the need to reclaim the central issue and the mapping of enforcement actions around the language, because only then is it possible identify the discourses that sustain and legitimize this discourse today. Based on the research questions and the proposed objectives it can be concluded that, in this manual, specifically, the management of language introduced among other effects of senses, that the standardization of the language falls in the order of the impossible, and if it is persecuted, precludes the exercise of speech. This impossibility is constituted as a way to resist coercion, domination. The discourses that underpin the attempt to "manage" the language come from the civilizations history, places and times in which language functioned as a political instrument of coercion, making it visible and legitimate institutionalized power.
id UCEN_fa2e6fa518e0ee45680d35a34c8f207b
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:tede/53
network_acronym_str UCEN
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO
repository_id_str
spelling Venturini, Maria CleciCPF:00000002020http://lattes.cnpq.br/6904278999384343CPF:01835919928http://lattes.cnpq.br/5948230473103649Salache, Loide Andréa2016-09-20T12:12:10Z2014-07-072014-03-21SALACHE, Loide Andréa. OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA. 2014. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Inglês e Literatura Correspondente) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Guarapuava, 2014.http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/53The theoretical foundations that anchor/support this research are those of discourse analysis, introduced by Michel Pecheux, in the 60s of XX century and structured in Brazil by Eni Orlandi and researchers who work with her. In this disciplinary field , the discourse is the center and only became the material of subjects interpellated by ideology and crossed by the unconscious. Methodologically, not searching for content, but for the way how certain effects are constituted. The discursive object and the cutouts made in the corpus are crucial for the methodological guidance. In this research, the research object is the discourse on language manualized in/of politically correct, meant as one more coercive action that seeks to manage the language. Three articles "opinion makers", belonging to discursive formations that overlap while they differ by the different subject-positions, structure the corpus. Those called by the manual authors of "opinion makers" respond by authory of the three materialities cut, and from those, we cut discursive sequences (SD) to be analyzed in order to answer the following research question: How in discourses about, the manual build up evidences that the language is always heterogeneous, despite the coercive practices? The overall goal around this issue is to understand the discursive function of language in manuals, highlighting the effects of senses beyond its management and its uniformity, seeking to identify the discourses that support this practice. This will encompass the following specific objectives: 1) mapping out government actions, which give visibility to the State Repressive Apparatus (SRA) in relation to language practices, 2) identify the discursive procedures, stablisher of evidence around the imposibility of the language functioning in its heterogeneity and its difficulties in manualisation, 3) highlight the conception of language functioning in materiality cut from the subject-positions occupied by those responsible for discourses about, on manualized language, emphasizing the regularities, the disruptions, the contradictions and discourses that support/anchor this operation. The work is divided into three chapters that are articulated in order to answer the proposed question and meet the objectives of this work. In the first chapter, we prioritized natural historical aspects, seeking to map out government practices that treat coercively the language, and try to manage it. We focus on the operation of the manual through notions that mean "how standardizing the language". In the second chapter, we undertook theories about the language functioning, from the theoretical conception of Discourse Analysis. The third chapter covers the analysis around the discursive sequences cut from the materiality that structure the corpus. We emphasize the need to reclaim the central issue and the mapping of enforcement actions around the language, because only then is it possible identify the discourses that sustain and legitimize this discourse today. Based on the research questions and the proposed objectives it can be concluded that, in this manual, specifically, the management of language introduced among other effects of senses, that the standardization of the language falls in the order of the impossible, and if it is persecuted, precludes the exercise of speech. This impossibility is constituted as a way to resist coercion, domination. The discourses that underpin the attempt to "manage" the language come from the civilizations history, places and times in which language functioned as a political instrument of coercion, making it visible and legitimate institutionalized power.Os fundamentos teóricos que ancoram/sustentam esta investigação são os da Análise de Discurso, tal como foi introduzida por Michel Pêcheux, na década de 60, do século XX e estruturada no Brasil, por Eni Orlandi e pesquisadores que com ela trabalham. Nesse campo disciplinar, o discurso é o centro e só se torna material a partir de sujeitos interpelados pela ideologia e atravessados pelo inconsciente. Metodologicamente, não busca por conteúdos, mas pelo modo como determinados efeitos de sentidos se constituem. O objeto discursivo e os recortes realizados no corpus são determinantes para o direcionamento metodológico. Nessa investigação, o objeto de pesquisa é o discurso sobre a língua manualizada no/do politicamente correto, significada como mais uma ação coercitiva que busca o gerenciamento da língua. Três artigos "formadores de opinião", pertencentes a formações discursivas que se imbricam e ao mesmo tempo se diferenciam, pelas distintas posições-sujeito, estruturam o corpus. Os chamados, pelos autores do manual, de "formadores de opinião", respondem pela autoria das três materialidades recortadas e, a partir dessas materialidades, recortamos sequências discursivas (SD`s) a serem analisadas, com o objetivo de responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa: Como nos discursos sobre o manual constroem-se efeitos de evidências de que a língua é sempre heterogênea, apesar das práticas coercitivas? O objetivo geral em torno dessa questão é compreender o funcionamento discursivo da língua no manual, destacando os efeitos de sentidos que escapam ao seu gerenciamento e a sua uniformização, buscando identificar os discursos que sustentam essa prática. Esse objetivo geral desdobra-se nos objetivos específicos a seguir: 1) mapear ações governamentais que dão visibilidade ao Estado como Aparelho Repressivo (ARE) em relação às práticas linguajeiras; 2) identificar os procedimentos discursivos instauradores de evidências em torno do funcionamento da língua em sua heterogeneidade e as dificuldades de sua manualização; 3) destacar a concepção de língua em funcionamento nas materialidades recortadas a partir das posições-sujeito ocupadas pelos responsáveis pelos discursos sobre a língua manualizada, enfatizando as regularidades, as rupturas, as contradições e os discursos que sustentam/ancoram esse funcionamento. O trabalho estrutura-se em três capítulos que se articulam de modo a responder à questão proposta e atender aos objetivos deste trabalho. No primeiro capítulo, priorizamos aspectos de cunho histórico, buscando mapear práticas governamentais que tratam a língua coercitivamente e tentam gerenciá-la. Enfocamos o funcionamento do manual por meio de noções que o significam "como uniformização da língua". No segundo capítulo, empreendemos teorizações em torno do funcionamento da língua, a partir da concepção teórica da Análise de Discurso. O terceiro capítulo abarca as análises em torno das sequências discursivas recortadas das materialidades que estruturam o corpus. Enfatizamos a necessidade da retomada da questão central e do mapeamento das ações coercitivas em torno da língua, porque só assim é possível identificar os discursos que sustentam a atualidade deste discurso e o legitimam. A partir das questões de pesquisa e dos objetivos propostos pode-se concluir que, nesse manual, especificamente, o gerenciamento da língua instaurou, entre outros efeitos de sentidos, o de que, a uniformização da língua inscreve-se na ordem do impossível e a heterogeneidade constituise como um modo de resistir à coerção, à dominação. Os discursos que sustentam a tentativa de "gerenciamento" da língua advêm da história das civilizações, de lugares e tempos em que a língua funcionou como instrumento político de dominação, tornando visível e legítimo o poder institucionalizado.Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-20T12:12:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdf: 1164254 bytes, checksum: 863a3531b1fdf5eb73af7bca74598310 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03-21Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://localhost:8080/tede/retrieve/609/PR%20LOIDE%20ANDREA%20SALACHE.pdf.jpgporUNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro OestePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Letras (Mestrado)UNICENTROBRUnicentro::Departamento de Letrassujeitolínguaideologiaculturadeterminação históricasubjectlanguageideologyculturehistorical determinationLINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRASOS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUATHE OPINION MAKERS AND THE DISURSE AOUT THE LANGUAGE MNUALIZAÇÃOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-36790127027910392826006006006006928445873504035893-54094192628864980882075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTROinstname:Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)instacron:UNICENTROORIGINALPR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdfapplication/pdf1164254http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/1/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf863a3531b1fdf5eb73af7bca74598310MD51TEXTPR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdf.txtPR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdf.txttext/plain52213http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/2/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf.txt1a1c9fa8c6b64531224b2ae47ba762efMD52THUMBNAILPR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdf.jpgPR LOIDE ANDREA SALACHE.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3269http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/3/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf.jpg8821ed80a02cbd8b03a96fca614903cdMD53tede/532021-03-04 15:35:50.073oai:localhost:tede/53Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede.unicentro.br:8080/jspui/PUBhttp://tede.unicentro.br/tde_oai/oai3.phprepositorio@unicentro.br||fabianoqueiroz@yahoo.com.bropendoar:2021-03-04T18:35:50Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv THE OPINION MAKERS AND THE DISURSE AOUT THE LANGUAGE MNUALIZAÇÃO
title OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
spellingShingle OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
Salache, Loide Andréa
sujeito
língua
ideologia
cultura
determinação histórica
subject
language
ideology
culture
historical determination
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
title_short OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
title_full OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
title_fullStr OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
title_full_unstemmed OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
title_sort OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA
author Salache, Loide Andréa
author_facet Salache, Loide Andréa
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Venturini, Maria Cleci
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:00000002020
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6904278999384343
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:01835919928
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5948230473103649
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salache, Loide Andréa
contributor_str_mv Venturini, Maria Cleci
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sujeito
língua
ideologia
cultura
determinação histórica
topic sujeito
língua
ideologia
cultura
determinação histórica
subject
language
ideology
culture
historical determination
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv subject
language
ideology
culture
historical determination
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
description The theoretical foundations that anchor/support this research are those of discourse analysis, introduced by Michel Pecheux, in the 60s of XX century and structured in Brazil by Eni Orlandi and researchers who work with her. In this disciplinary field , the discourse is the center and only became the material of subjects interpellated by ideology and crossed by the unconscious. Methodologically, not searching for content, but for the way how certain effects are constituted. The discursive object and the cutouts made in the corpus are crucial for the methodological guidance. In this research, the research object is the discourse on language manualized in/of politically correct, meant as one more coercive action that seeks to manage the language. Three articles "opinion makers", belonging to discursive formations that overlap while they differ by the different subject-positions, structure the corpus. Those called by the manual authors of "opinion makers" respond by authory of the three materialities cut, and from those, we cut discursive sequences (SD) to be analyzed in order to answer the following research question: How in discourses about, the manual build up evidences that the language is always heterogeneous, despite the coercive practices? The overall goal around this issue is to understand the discursive function of language in manuals, highlighting the effects of senses beyond its management and its uniformity, seeking to identify the discourses that support this practice. This will encompass the following specific objectives: 1) mapping out government actions, which give visibility to the State Repressive Apparatus (SRA) in relation to language practices, 2) identify the discursive procedures, stablisher of evidence around the imposibility of the language functioning in its heterogeneity and its difficulties in manualisation, 3) highlight the conception of language functioning in materiality cut from the subject-positions occupied by those responsible for discourses about, on manualized language, emphasizing the regularities, the disruptions, the contradictions and discourses that support/anchor this operation. The work is divided into three chapters that are articulated in order to answer the proposed question and meet the objectives of this work. In the first chapter, we prioritized natural historical aspects, seeking to map out government practices that treat coercively the language, and try to manage it. We focus on the operation of the manual through notions that mean "how standardizing the language". In the second chapter, we undertook theories about the language functioning, from the theoretical conception of Discourse Analysis. The third chapter covers the analysis around the discursive sequences cut from the materiality that structure the corpus. We emphasize the need to reclaim the central issue and the mapping of enforcement actions around the language, because only then is it possible identify the discourses that sustain and legitimize this discourse today. Based on the research questions and the proposed objectives it can be concluded that, in this manual, specifically, the management of language introduced among other effects of senses, that the standardization of the language falls in the order of the impossible, and if it is persecuted, precludes the exercise of speech. This impossibility is constituted as a way to resist coercion, domination. The discourses that underpin the attempt to "manage" the language come from the civilizations history, places and times in which language functioned as a political instrument of coercion, making it visible and legitimate institutionalized power.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2014-07-07
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-03-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-09-20T12:12:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SALACHE, Loide Andréa. OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA. 2014. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Inglês e Literatura Correspondente) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Guarapuava, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/53
identifier_str_mv SALACHE, Loide Andréa. OS FORMADORES DE OPINIÃO E O DISCURSO SOBRE A MANUALIZAÇÃO DA LÍNGUA. 2014. 159 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Inglês e Literatura Correspondente) - UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste, Guarapuava, 2014.
url http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/53
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3679012702791039282
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 6928445873504035893
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -5409419262886498088
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (Mestrado)
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNICENTRO
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Unicentro::Departamento de Letras
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro Oeste
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO
instname:Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)
instacron:UNICENTRO
instname_str Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)
instacron_str UNICENTRO
institution UNICENTRO
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/1/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/2/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/tede/53/3/PR+LOIDE+ANDREA+SALACHE.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 863a3531b1fdf5eb73af7bca74598310
1a1c9fa8c6b64531224b2ae47ba762ef
8821ed80a02cbd8b03a96fca614903cd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UNICENTRO - Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (UNICENTRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@unicentro.br||fabianoqueiroz@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1811733805564690432