O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura de
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sociedade em Debate (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683
Resumo: The social security system, which became the dominant model ofsocial policies in Brazil, has been, since 1990, undergoing a process of counter-reforms that express the fragmentation of the rights previously won by the working class. One of the results of this processes is the broadening of the market for pension funds or private pensions. Present-day context shows us the stimulus, aimed at workers, to adhere to private pension plans in order to maintain their income that has been withdrawn by public pension. Under this context, the paper seeks to analyze the forms of employee participation in security policies via social control, aiming to question what kind of control has been exercised both on public and private pension spaces.
id UCPEL-2_656638c00c638123891a4660b776f2d8
oai_identifier_str oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/683
network_acronym_str UCPEL-2
network_name_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systemsO controle social na Previdência: um paradoxo entre o sistema público e o privadosocial securitysocial controlparticipationPrevidência socialcontrole socialparticipaçãoThe social security system, which became the dominant model ofsocial policies in Brazil, has been, since 1990, undergoing a process of counter-reforms that express the fragmentation of the rights previously won by the working class. One of the results of this processes is the broadening of the market for pension funds or private pensions. Present-day context shows us the stimulus, aimed at workers, to adhere to private pension plans in order to maintain their income that has been withdrawn by public pension. Under this context, the paper seeks to analyze the forms of employee participation in security policies via social control, aiming to question what kind of control has been exercised both on public and private pension spaces.A previdência social, que se configurou como o modelo predominante de política social no Brasil, vem a partir de 1990, sofrendo um processo de contrarreformas que sintetizam o esfacelamento de direitos conquistados pela classe trabalhadora. Em decorrência desse processo amplia-se o mercado para a previdência privada/complementar. O contexto atual revela o incentivo a adesão dos trabalhadores para os planos privados de previdência como forma de manter sua condição de renda retirada pela previdência pública. Mediante esse contexto o artigo visa analisar as formas de participação dos trabalhadores na política previdenciária via controle social, buscando problematizar que controle vem sendo exercido na Previdência pública e nos espaços de previdência privada.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2012-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-36Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-36Sociedade em Debate; v. 17 n. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-362317-02041414-9869reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683/607Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-16T16:31:35Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/683Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2024-05-16T16:31:35Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
O controle social na Previdência: um paradoxo entre o sistema público e o privado
title O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
spellingShingle O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura de
social security
social control
participation
Previdência social
controle social
participação
title_short O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
title_full O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
title_fullStr O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
title_full_unstemmed O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
title_sort O social control on social security: a paradox between the public and private systems
author Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura de
author_facet Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assis, Rivânia Lúcia Moura de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv social security
social control
participation
Previdência social
controle social
participação
topic social security
social control
participation
Previdência social
controle social
participação
description The social security system, which became the dominant model ofsocial policies in Brazil, has been, since 1990, undergoing a process of counter-reforms that express the fragmentation of the rights previously won by the working class. One of the results of this processes is the broadening of the market for pension funds or private pensions. Present-day context shows us the stimulus, aimed at workers, to adhere to private pension plans in order to maintain their income that has been withdrawn by public pension. Under this context, the paper seeks to analyze the forms of employee participation in security policies via social control, aiming to question what kind of control has been exercised both on public and private pension spaces.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683
url https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/683/607
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-36
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-36
Sociedade em Debate; v. 17 n. 1 (2011): Sociedade em Debate; 11-36
2317-0204
1414-9869
reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)
instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron:UCPEL
instname_str Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
instacron_str UCPEL
institution UCPEL
reponame_str Sociedade em Debate (Online)
collection Sociedade em Debate (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br
_version_ 1799304253274062849

Registros relacionados