Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378 |
Resumo: | This paper retrieves some of the aspects and debates of the investigation Las profesiones en las actuales relaciones Estado/ sociedad: el caso del Trabajo Social (“Professions in modern state-society relations: the case of Social Work”), conducted at the School of Social Work of the National University of Cordoba between the years of 2004 and 2007. The work focused on the professional practices and degree of autonomy/heteronomy of social workers, particularly as this is applied in relation to two matters that we consider chief in specifically defining the social intervention of the profession: decisionmaking processes and discourses on subjects of interest. The purpose of the research is to analyse the conceptions, justifications and decisions underlying the interventions of social workers within the sub-sector of the state, civil and mercantile society. |
id |
UCPEL-2_a0577ee4674d8fb8261da44783192933 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/378 |
network_acronym_str |
UCPEL-2 |
network_name_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy?Trabajo Social: ¿Utopías de autonomía profesional?Social Workprofessional practicesautonomyTrabajo Socialpráticas profesionalesautonomiaThis paper retrieves some of the aspects and debates of the investigation Las profesiones en las actuales relaciones Estado/ sociedad: el caso del Trabajo Social (“Professions in modern state-society relations: the case of Social Work”), conducted at the School of Social Work of the National University of Cordoba between the years of 2004 and 2007. The work focused on the professional practices and degree of autonomy/heteronomy of social workers, particularly as this is applied in relation to two matters that we consider chief in specifically defining the social intervention of the profession: decisionmaking processes and discourses on subjects of interest. The purpose of the research is to analyse the conceptions, justifications and decisions underlying the interventions of social workers within the sub-sector of the state, civil and mercantile society.El presente trabajo recupera algunos aspectos y debates de La investigación “Las profesiones en las actuales relaciones Estado/ sociedad: el caso del Trabajo Social”, desarrollada en la Escuela de Trabajo Social, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba entre los años 2004 – 2007. Nuestro interes estuvo centrado en la mirada de las prácticas profesionales de los/lãs trabajadores sociales y el grado de autonomía/heteronomía que se ejerce y, particularmente la forma en que se expresa en dos asuntos que consideramos claves al momento de definir lo específico de la intervención social de La profesión: los procesos de toma de decisiones y los discursos acerca de los sujetos con los que nos vinculamos. La investigación se plantea; Analizar concepciones, justificaciones y decisiones a partir de las cuales los trabajadores sociales insertos en el sub-sector del Estado, sociedad civil y mercantil desarrollan sus intervenciones.PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos2012-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-184Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-184Sociedade em Debate; v. 14 n. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-1842317-02041414-9869reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online)instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)instacron:UCPELporhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378/335Rotondi, Gabrielainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-16T16:31:21Zoai:www.rle.ucpel.tche.br:article/378Revistahttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsdPUBhttps://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/index.php/rsd/oaiveramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br2317-02041414-9869opendoar:2024-05-16T16:31:21Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? Trabajo Social: ¿Utopías de autonomía profesional? |
title |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
spellingShingle |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? Rotondi, Gabriela Social Work professional practices autonomy Trabajo Social práticas profesionales autonomia |
title_short |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
title_full |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
title_fullStr |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
title_sort |
Social Work: a utopia of professional autonomy? |
author |
Rotondi, Gabriela |
author_facet |
Rotondi, Gabriela |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rotondi, Gabriela |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social Work professional practices autonomy Trabajo Social práticas profesionales autonomia |
topic |
Social Work professional practices autonomy Trabajo Social práticas profesionales autonomia |
description |
This paper retrieves some of the aspects and debates of the investigation Las profesiones en las actuales relaciones Estado/ sociedad: el caso del Trabajo Social (“Professions in modern state-society relations: the case of Social Work”), conducted at the School of Social Work of the National University of Cordoba between the years of 2004 and 2007. The work focused on the professional practices and degree of autonomy/heteronomy of social workers, particularly as this is applied in relation to two matters that we consider chief in specifically defining the social intervention of the profession: decisionmaking processes and discourses on subjects of interest. The purpose of the research is to analyse the conceptions, justifications and decisions underlying the interventions of social workers within the sub-sector of the state, civil and mercantile society. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378 |
url |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucpel.edu.br/rsd/article/view/378/335 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PPG em Política Social e Direitos Humanos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 14 No. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-184 Sociedade em Debate; Vol. 14 Núm. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-184 Sociedade em Debate; v. 14 n. 2 (2008): Sociedade em Debate; 169-184 2317-0204 1414-9869 reponame:Sociedade em Debate (Online) instname:Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) instacron:UCPEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
instacron_str |
UCPEL |
institution |
UCPEL |
reponame_str |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
collection |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade em Debate (Online) - Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
veramrn@gmail.com||revista@phoenix.ucpel.tche.br |
_version_ |
1799304252476096512 |