Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5275 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nozzles on spray droplet deposition in the peanut crop cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’. The study was conducted in the field, and the applications of treatments performed in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2). It was used the Brilliant Blue FDC – 1 as tracer in water solution, at 500 ppm. The treatments consisted of seven spray nozzle XR 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), XR 11002 VS (200 L ha-1), TX-VK 6 (150L ha-1), TX-VK 8 (200 L ha-1), AI 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), AI11002 VS (200 L ha-1) e TJ60 11002 VS (150 e 200 L ha-1). It was used a randomized blocks design, with four replications. After application, plants were immediately collected, and washed in 100 mL of distilled water for posterior tracer quantification in spectrophotometer. The data had been adjusted a regression curve for Gompertz model. The results had evidenced that at low volumes of application the nozzle AI 110015 VS and TJ60 11002 VS, were the ones with best distribution uniformity of spray on plants of peanut cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’ in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2) respectively, and the largest deposits and higher percentage of failures in applications have been found in younger plants by comparing the growth stages of application, regardless of the spray nozzle and volume. |
id |
UEL-11_00f7967f68bdd441718253fd2ccdb964 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5275 |
network_acronym_str |
UEL-11 |
network_name_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut cropDesempenho de pontas de pulverização na deposição de gotas de pulverização na cultura do amendoimSpray nozzleApplication technologyUniformity of deposition.Ponta de pulverizaçãoTecnologia de aplicaçãoUniformidade de deposição.The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nozzles on spray droplet deposition in the peanut crop cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’. The study was conducted in the field, and the applications of treatments performed in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2). It was used the Brilliant Blue FDC – 1 as tracer in water solution, at 500 ppm. The treatments consisted of seven spray nozzle XR 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), XR 11002 VS (200 L ha-1), TX-VK 6 (150L ha-1), TX-VK 8 (200 L ha-1), AI 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), AI11002 VS (200 L ha-1) e TJ60 11002 VS (150 e 200 L ha-1). It was used a randomized blocks design, with four replications. After application, plants were immediately collected, and washed in 100 mL of distilled water for posterior tracer quantification in spectrophotometer. The data had been adjusted a regression curve for Gompertz model. The results had evidenced that at low volumes of application the nozzle AI 110015 VS and TJ60 11002 VS, were the ones with best distribution uniformity of spray on plants of peanut cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’ in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2) respectively, and the largest deposits and higher percentage of failures in applications have been found in younger plants by comparing the growth stages of application, regardless of the spray nozzle and volume.O objetivo deste estudo foi o de avaliar o efeito de pontas de pulverização na deposição de gotas na cultura do amendoim da cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’. O estudo foi realizado a campo, sendo as aplicações dos tratamentos realizadas nos estádios vegetativo (V1) e reprodutivo (R2). Foi utilizado como marcador o corante Azul Brilhante FDC -1 na concentração de 500 ppm. Os tratamentos foram constituídos por sete pontas de pulverização: XR 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), XR 11002 VS (200 L ha-1), TX-VK 6 (150L ha-1), TX-VK 8 (200 L ha-1), AI 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), AI11002 VS (200 L ha-1) e TJ60 11002 VS (150 e 200 L ha-1). Utilizou-se o delineamento em blocos ao acaso, com 4 repetições. Após a aplicação, as plantas foram imediatamente coletadas, e lavadas em 100 mL de água destilada para posterior quantificação do marcador em espectrofotômetro. Para as análises qualitativas, cada planta selecionada ao acaso dentro da faixa de aplicação da barra foi considerada uma repetição, o que representou um total de 100 repetições. Os dados obtidos foram ajustados à curva de regressão pelo modelo de Gompertz. Os resultados evidenciaram que independente do volume de aplicação as pontas AI 110015 VS e AI 11002 VS, foram as que proporcionaram maiores depósitos de calda de pulverização em plantas de amendoim em estádio vegetativo (V1) e reprodutivo (R2), respectivamente. Em volume baixo de aplicação as pontas AI 110015 VS e TJ60 11002 VS, foram as que proporcionaram as maiores uniformidade de distribuição da calda em plantas de amendoim Cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’ em estádio vegetativo (V1) e reprodutivo (R2) respectivamente, e os maiores depósitos e maiores porcentagem de falhas nas aplicações, foram encontrados em plantas mais jovens comparando os estádios fenológicos de aplicação, independente da ponta e volume.UEL2011-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpesquisa de campoapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/527510.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1745Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 4Sup1 (2011); 1745-1758Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 4Sup1 (2011); 1745-17581679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5275/9134Costa, Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues daMartins, DagobertoCosta, Neumárcio Vilanova daPereira, Maria Renata RochaSilva, José Iran Cardoso dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-11-19T18:38:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/5275Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2015-11-19T18:38:11Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop Desempenho de pontas de pulverização na deposição de gotas de pulverização na cultura do amendoim |
title |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
spellingShingle |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop Costa, Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Spray nozzle Application technology Uniformity of deposition. Ponta de pulverização Tecnologia de aplicação Uniformidade de deposição. |
title_short |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
title_full |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
title_fullStr |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
title_sort |
Spray nozzles performance in the deposition of spray droplets on peanut crop |
author |
Costa, Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da |
author_facet |
Costa, Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Martins, Dagoberto Costa, Neumárcio Vilanova da Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Silva, José Iran Cardoso da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins, Dagoberto Costa, Neumárcio Vilanova da Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Silva, José Iran Cardoso da |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Andreia Cristina Peres Rodrigues da Martins, Dagoberto Costa, Neumárcio Vilanova da Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Silva, José Iran Cardoso da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spray nozzle Application technology Uniformity of deposition. Ponta de pulverização Tecnologia de aplicação Uniformidade de deposição. |
topic |
Spray nozzle Application technology Uniformity of deposition. Ponta de pulverização Tecnologia de aplicação Uniformidade de deposição. |
description |
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of nozzles on spray droplet deposition in the peanut crop cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’. The study was conducted in the field, and the applications of treatments performed in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2). It was used the Brilliant Blue FDC – 1 as tracer in water solution, at 500 ppm. The treatments consisted of seven spray nozzle XR 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), XR 11002 VS (200 L ha-1), TX-VK 6 (150L ha-1), TX-VK 8 (200 L ha-1), AI 110015 VS (150 L ha-1), AI11002 VS (200 L ha-1) e TJ60 11002 VS (150 e 200 L ha-1). It was used a randomized blocks design, with four replications. After application, plants were immediately collected, and washed in 100 mL of distilled water for posterior tracer quantification in spectrophotometer. The data had been adjusted a regression curve for Gompertz model. The results had evidenced that at low volumes of application the nozzle AI 110015 VS and TJ60 11002 VS, were the ones with best distribution uniformity of spray on plants of peanut cultivar ‘Runner IAC 886’ in the vegetative stage (V1) and reproductive (R2) respectively, and the largest deposits and higher percentage of failures in applications have been found in younger plants by comparing the growth stages of application, regardless of the spray nozzle and volume. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion pesquisa de campo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5275 10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1745 |
url |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5275 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1745 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/5275/9134 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UEL |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 32 No. 4Sup1 (2011); 1745-1758 Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 32 n. 4Sup1 (2011); 1745-1758 1679-0359 1676-546X reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) instacron:UEL |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
instacron_str |
UEL |
institution |
UEL |
reponame_str |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
collection |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
semina.agrarias@uel.br |
_version_ |
1799306061931347968 |