Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Candido, Matheus Joaquim dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Zanini, Surama Freitas, Ferreira, Marcus de Freitas, Araujo, Filipe Augusto Coimbra de, Teixeira, Alan Paulo Moreira, Cipriano, Raoni Cezana, Moulim, Maria Augusta Pires da Luz Chieppe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40728
Resumo: Brazil is the third largest producer and the main exporter of chicken meat in the world. In 2019, it produced approximately 13.245 million tons of the product, generating more than six million dollars. According to the Poultry Association of the state of Espírito Santo, broiler production is carried out by 28 independent producers/companies, three integrator businesses, 42 integrated producers and seven slaughterhouses (structures with SIF, SIE/SISBI or SIE certification). Despite the growth of this sector, problems persist regarding the quality of carcasses and the number of condemnations. From the sanitary and industrial point of view, all products of animal origin must undergo prior inspection. The present study was developed using data generated by the Federal Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Federal, SIF) and the State Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Estadual, SIE). The main causes of condemnation of birds as inspected by SIF represented 9.26% of the slaughtered birds. Total condemnations corresponded to 1.35%. Overall, this study recorded a greater number of condemnations of non-pathological origin. In conclusion, there was consistency in the reasons why these products were condemned. Bruises/fractures and contamination were the most frequent causes according to both inspection services (SIF and SIE), indicating a common problem on the slaughter and inspection lines.
id UEL-11_031142d9fbb7893fe952d1a5fe10eae9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40728
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, BrazilPrincipais causas de condenações de carcaça de frango no Espírito Santo, BrasilBroilersCondemnationControlInspection.CondenaçãoFiscalizaçãoFrango de corteInspeção.Brazil is the third largest producer and the main exporter of chicken meat in the world. In 2019, it produced approximately 13.245 million tons of the product, generating more than six million dollars. According to the Poultry Association of the state of Espírito Santo, broiler production is carried out by 28 independent producers/companies, three integrator businesses, 42 integrated producers and seven slaughterhouses (structures with SIF, SIE/SISBI or SIE certification). Despite the growth of this sector, problems persist regarding the quality of carcasses and the number of condemnations. From the sanitary and industrial point of view, all products of animal origin must undergo prior inspection. The present study was developed using data generated by the Federal Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Federal, SIF) and the State Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Estadual, SIE). The main causes of condemnation of birds as inspected by SIF represented 9.26% of the slaughtered birds. Total condemnations corresponded to 1.35%. Overall, this study recorded a greater number of condemnations of non-pathological origin. In conclusion, there was consistency in the reasons why these products were condemned. Bruises/fractures and contamination were the most frequent causes according to both inspection services (SIF and SIE), indicating a common problem on the slaughter and inspection lines.O Brasil é o terceiro maior produtor e o principal exportador de carne de frango do mundo. Em 2019, produziu aproximadamente 13,245 milhões de toneladas, faturando mais de seis milhões de dólares. Segundo a Associação dos Avicultores do Estado do Espírito Santo, a avicultura de corte conta com 28 produtores/empresas independentes, três integradoras, 42 integrados além de 7 abatedouros (estruturas com SIF, SIE/SISBI ou SIE). Embora tenha havido crescimento neste setor, ainda persistem problemas relacionados com a qualidade das carcaças e com o quantitativo de condenações. Sob o ponto de vista sanitário e industrial todos os produtos de origem animal devem receber fiscalização prévia. O presente trabalho foi desenvolvido mediante levantamento de dados gerados pelo Serviço de Inspeção Federal (SIF) e pelo Serviço de Inspeção Estadual (SIE). As principais causas de condenações de aves inspecionadas pelo SIF representaram 9,26% das aves abatidas. Para as condenações totais foi registrado o percentual de 1,35%. Este estudo registrou, no geral, um maior número de condenações de origem não patológica. Conclui-se que houve uma constância nas razões pelas quais esses produtos sofreram condenações. As contusões/fraturas e contaminações foram as de maior ocorrência, em ambos os Serviços de Inspeção (SIF e SIE), indicando um problema comum na linha de abate e inspeção.UEL2021-03-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionScientific methodsapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/4072810.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3p1129Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2021); 1129-1146Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 3 (2021); 1129-11461679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40728/29163Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agráriashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCandido, Matheus Joaquim dos SantosZanini, Surama FreitasFerreira, Marcus de FreitasAraujo, Filipe Augusto Coimbra deTeixeira, Alan Paulo MoreiraCipriano, Raoni CezanaMoulim, Maria Augusta Pires da Luz Chieppe2022-10-04T12:50:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40728Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-10-04T12:50:59Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
Principais causas de condenações de carcaça de frango no Espírito Santo, Brasil
title Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
spellingShingle Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
Candido, Matheus Joaquim dos Santos
Broilers
Condemnation
Control
Inspection.
Condenação
Fiscalização
Frango de corte
Inspeção.
title_short Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
title_full Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
title_fullStr Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
title_sort Main causes of chicken carcass condemnations in Espírito Santo, Brazil
author Candido, Matheus Joaquim dos Santos
author_facet Candido, Matheus Joaquim dos Santos
Zanini, Surama Freitas
Ferreira, Marcus de Freitas
Araujo, Filipe Augusto Coimbra de
Teixeira, Alan Paulo Moreira
Cipriano, Raoni Cezana
Moulim, Maria Augusta Pires da Luz Chieppe
author_role author
author2 Zanini, Surama Freitas
Ferreira, Marcus de Freitas
Araujo, Filipe Augusto Coimbra de
Teixeira, Alan Paulo Moreira
Cipriano, Raoni Cezana
Moulim, Maria Augusta Pires da Luz Chieppe
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Candido, Matheus Joaquim dos Santos
Zanini, Surama Freitas
Ferreira, Marcus de Freitas
Araujo, Filipe Augusto Coimbra de
Teixeira, Alan Paulo Moreira
Cipriano, Raoni Cezana
Moulim, Maria Augusta Pires da Luz Chieppe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Broilers
Condemnation
Control
Inspection.
Condenação
Fiscalização
Frango de corte
Inspeção.
topic Broilers
Condemnation
Control
Inspection.
Condenação
Fiscalização
Frango de corte
Inspeção.
description Brazil is the third largest producer and the main exporter of chicken meat in the world. In 2019, it produced approximately 13.245 million tons of the product, generating more than six million dollars. According to the Poultry Association of the state of Espírito Santo, broiler production is carried out by 28 independent producers/companies, three integrator businesses, 42 integrated producers and seven slaughterhouses (structures with SIF, SIE/SISBI or SIE certification). Despite the growth of this sector, problems persist regarding the quality of carcasses and the number of condemnations. From the sanitary and industrial point of view, all products of animal origin must undergo prior inspection. The present study was developed using data generated by the Federal Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Federal, SIF) and the State Inspection Service (Serviço de Inspeção Estadual, SIE). The main causes of condemnation of birds as inspected by SIF represented 9.26% of the slaughtered birds. Total condemnations corresponded to 1.35%. Overall, this study recorded a greater number of condemnations of non-pathological origin. In conclusion, there was consistency in the reasons why these products were condemned. Bruises/fractures and contamination were the most frequent causes according to both inspection services (SIF and SIE), indicating a common problem on the slaughter and inspection lines.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Scientific methods
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40728
10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3p1129
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40728
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n3p1129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/40728/29163
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Semina: Ciências Agrárias
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 42 No. 3 (2021); 1129-1146
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 42 n. 3 (2021); 1129-1146
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306083416670208

Registros relacionados