Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Andrielle Thainar Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Carvalho, José Oliveira, Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21231
Resumo:  A variety of laboratory tests were developed to obtain more reliable results of sperm evaluation and increase the accuracy of sperm fertility predictions. These tests detected damage of sperm specific compartments or organelles, which cannot be detected in routine sperm analysis. The use of fluorescent probes and detection using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry is an important tool but a more precise and accurate laboratory test is needed. Propidium iodide and 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate are used for evaluations of plasmatic membrane integrity. Fluorescein isothiocyanate, associated with conjugated lecithin Psium sativum or Arachis hypogaea, are used for evaluations of acrosome integrity. Two probes, MitoTracker or Rhodamine123, are generally used to measure the absence or presence of mitochondrial potential. However, a better option is 5,5’; 6,6’ - tetrachloro - 1,1’; 3,3’ -tetraetilbenzimidazolil-carbocyanine (JC-1) dye, which assesses not only the presence of mitochondrial potential and distinguished spermatozoa with poorly and highly functional mitochondria. Two techniques, TUNEL or COMETA, and the Acridine Orange Test (AOT) dye are used to evaluate chromatin integrity. A fluorescence technique based on chlortetracycline (CTC) or Merocyanine 540 is used to estimate whether sperm pass by or through the capacitation process. This review focuses on the fluorescent probes that are most widely used to evaluate plasma membrane integrity, capacitation, acrosome integrity, chromatin integrity and mitochondrial potential.
id UEL-11_309b06c6c6cae6b945932580ea033228
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21231
network_acronym_str UEL-11
network_name_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probesTécnicas para avaliação espermática utilizando sondas fluorescentesFluorescence microscopySpermCryopreservation.Microscopia de fluorescênciaEspermatozóideCriopreservação. A variety of laboratory tests were developed to obtain more reliable results of sperm evaluation and increase the accuracy of sperm fertility predictions. These tests detected damage of sperm specific compartments or organelles, which cannot be detected in routine sperm analysis. The use of fluorescent probes and detection using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry is an important tool but a more precise and accurate laboratory test is needed. Propidium iodide and 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate are used for evaluations of plasmatic membrane integrity. Fluorescein isothiocyanate, associated with conjugated lecithin Psium sativum or Arachis hypogaea, are used for evaluations of acrosome integrity. Two probes, MitoTracker or Rhodamine123, are generally used to measure the absence or presence of mitochondrial potential. However, a better option is 5,5’; 6,6’ - tetrachloro - 1,1’; 3,3’ -tetraetilbenzimidazolil-carbocyanine (JC-1) dye, which assesses not only the presence of mitochondrial potential and distinguished spermatozoa with poorly and highly functional mitochondria. Two techniques, TUNEL or COMETA, and the Acridine Orange Test (AOT) dye are used to evaluate chromatin integrity. A fluorescence technique based on chlortetracycline (CTC) or Merocyanine 540 is used to estimate whether sperm pass by or through the capacitation process. This review focuses on the fluorescent probes that are most widely used to evaluate plasma membrane integrity, capacitation, acrosome integrity, chromatin integrity and mitochondrial potential.Diversos testes laboratoriais têm sido desenvolvidos com o intuito de obter resultados confiáveis nas avaliações espermáticas, aumentando a qualidade e a confiabilidade do sêmen utilizado em técnicas de reprodução assistida. Esses testes têm permitido detectar danos em compartimentos e organelas específicas da célula espermática, que não são detectados nas análises de rotina. Dentre esses testes, o uso de sondas fluorescentes e sua detecção em microscópio de epifluorescência ou citometria de fluxo se tornaram ferramenta importante quando uma avaliação mais acurada é necessária. Para a avaliação da integridade de membrana plasmática, pode ser utilizado o iodeto de propídio, associado ao diacetato de 6-carboxifluoresceína. As avaliações de integridade acrossomal podem ser feitas através do isotiocianato de fluoresceína, associado às lecitinas conjugadas, como a Psium sativum ou Arachis hypogaea. O potencial mitocondrial pode ser avaliado quanto à ausência ou presença através da sonda Mitotracker ou Rodamina 123. Outra opção ainda melhor pode ser observada utilizando o corante iodeto de 5,5’; 6,6’ – tetracloro – 1,1’; 3,3’ – tetraetilbenzimidazolil-carbocianina (JC-1), este corante avalia a presença do potencial mitocondrial e avalia quanto à classificação do grau. Para avaliar a integridade de cromatina, pode ser empregado o uso de duas técnicas conhecidas como TUNEL ou COMETA, ou pode ser utilizado o corante Acridine Orange Test (AOT). Para avaliar se o espermatozoide está passando ou passou pelo processo de capacitação, pode ser utilizada a técnica de fluorescência a base de clortetraciclina, o CTC, quelante do cálcio, ou a Merocianina 540. Esta revisão enfatiza as principais sondas fluorescentes disponíveis para avaliar a integridade de membrana plasmática, capacitação, integridade acrossomal, integridade da cromatina, e potencial mitocondrial.UEL2015-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/2123110.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4365Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6Supl2 (2015); 4365-4376Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6Supl2 (2015); 4365-43761679-03591676-546Xreponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELenghttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21231/17661http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha, Andrielle Thainar MendesCarvalho, José OliveiraDode, Margot Alves Nunes2022-12-02T15:57:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21231Revistahttp://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrariasPUBhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/oaisemina.agrarias@uel.br1679-03591676-546Xopendoar:2022-12-02T15:57:46Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
Técnicas para avaliação espermática utilizando sondas fluorescentes
title Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
spellingShingle Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
Cunha, Andrielle Thainar Mendes
Fluorescence microscopy
Sperm
Cryopreservation.
Microscopia de fluorescência
Espermatozóide
Criopreservação.
title_short Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
title_full Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
title_fullStr Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
title_full_unstemmed Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
title_sort Techniques for sperm evaluation using fluorescent probes
author Cunha, Andrielle Thainar Mendes
author_facet Cunha, Andrielle Thainar Mendes
Carvalho, José Oliveira
Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, José Oliveira
Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Andrielle Thainar Mendes
Carvalho, José Oliveira
Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fluorescence microscopy
Sperm
Cryopreservation.
Microscopia de fluorescência
Espermatozóide
Criopreservação.
topic Fluorescence microscopy
Sperm
Cryopreservation.
Microscopia de fluorescência
Espermatozóide
Criopreservação.
description  A variety of laboratory tests were developed to obtain more reliable results of sperm evaluation and increase the accuracy of sperm fertility predictions. These tests detected damage of sperm specific compartments or organelles, which cannot be detected in routine sperm analysis. The use of fluorescent probes and detection using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry is an important tool but a more precise and accurate laboratory test is needed. Propidium iodide and 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate are used for evaluations of plasmatic membrane integrity. Fluorescein isothiocyanate, associated with conjugated lecithin Psium sativum or Arachis hypogaea, are used for evaluations of acrosome integrity. Two probes, MitoTracker or Rhodamine123, are generally used to measure the absence or presence of mitochondrial potential. However, a better option is 5,5’; 6,6’ - tetrachloro - 1,1’; 3,3’ -tetraetilbenzimidazolil-carbocyanine (JC-1) dye, which assesses not only the presence of mitochondrial potential and distinguished spermatozoa with poorly and highly functional mitochondria. Two techniques, TUNEL or COMETA, and the Acridine Orange Test (AOT) dye are used to evaluate chromatin integrity. A fluorescence technique based on chlortetracycline (CTC) or Merocyanine 540 is used to estimate whether sperm pass by or through the capacitation process. This review focuses on the fluorescent probes that are most widely used to evaluate plasma membrane integrity, capacitation, acrosome integrity, chromatin integrity and mitochondrial potential.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Revisão de Literatura
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21231
10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4365
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21231
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n6Supl2p4365
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21231/17661
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UEL
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias; Vol. 36 No. 6Supl2 (2015); 4365-4376
Semina: Ciências Agrárias; v. 36 n. 6Supl2 (2015); 4365-4376
1679-0359
1676-546X
reponame:Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
collection Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Semina. Ciências Agrárias (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv semina.agrarias@uel.br
_version_ 1799306073820102656